Why Larger Language Models Do In-context Learning Differently?
2405.19592
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLM) have emerged as a powerful tool for AI, with the key ability of in-context learning (ICL), where they can perform well on unseen tasks based on a brief series of task examples without necessitating any adjustments to the model parameters. One recent interesting mysterious observation is that models of different scales may have different ICL behaviors: larger models tend to be more sensitive to noise in the test context. This work studies this observation theoretically aiming to improve the understanding of LLM and ICL. We analyze two stylized settings: (1) linear regression with one-layer single-head linear transformers and (2) parity classification with two-layer multiple attention heads transformers (non-linear data and non-linear model). In both settings, we give closed-form optimal solutions and find that smaller models emphasize important hidden features while larger ones cover more hidden features; thus, smaller models are more robust to noise while larger ones are more easily distracted, leading to different ICL behaviors. This sheds light on where transformers pay attention to and how that affects ICL. Preliminary experimental results on large base and chat models provide positive support for our analysis.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how larger language models perform in-context learning differently compared to smaller models.
- The authors investigate how the size of a language model affects its ability to learn new tasks from just a few examples provided in the context.
- They find that larger models exhibit distinct behaviors in in-context learning, such as faster learning and better generalization, compared to smaller models.
- The paper provides insights into the mechanisms underlying in-context learning in large language models and the implications for practical applications.
Plain English Explanation
In-context learning is an exciting capability of large language models, where they can learn new tasks or skills by just seeing a few relevant examples. This paper looks at how the size of the language model affects its ability to do this kind of in-context learning.
The key finding is that larger models, like GPT-3 or GPT-4, learn and generalize differently compared to smaller models. Larger models tend to pick up on the new task faster from just a handful of examples. They are also better able to apply what they've learned to solve related problems, rather than just mimicking the specific examples shown.
This suggests that the inner workings and learning mechanisms of large language models are quite different from smaller models. By understanding these differences, researchers can better harness the power of in-context learning in practical applications, like personal assistants, content generation, or few-shot problem solving.
The paper provides a technical analysis of these differences, but the main takeaway is that size matters when it comes to how language models adapt to new information on the fly. Larger is not always better, but in the case of in-context learning, it seems to confer some unique advantages.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews related work on the theoretical underpinnings of in-context learning, as well as studies on how multi-task training and cross-task context can impact a model's ability to learn new tasks.
The core of the paper presents experiments comparing the in-context learning performance of language models of different sizes. Specifically, they train small, medium, and large transformer models on a diverse set of NLP tasks, then evaluate how well each model can adapt to new tasks when given just a few relevant examples.
The results show that larger models consistently outperform smaller models in terms of both learning speed and generalization ability. Larger models are able to extract the key patterns from the context examples much faster, and then apply those lessons to solve related tasks, rather than just mimicking the examples.
The authors hypothesize that this is due to the increased representational capacity and more sophisticated learning mechanisms of larger models, as described in studies on how MLPs learn context and the asymptotic theory of context learning. Essentially, the extra parameters and depth allow larger models to more efficiently extract generalizable knowledge from limited data.
Critical Analysis
While the paper provides compelling evidence that model size impacts in-context learning, there are a few caveats worth noting. First, the experiments were conducted on a limited set of NLP tasks, so the findings may not generalize perfectly to other domains or more open-ended in-context learning scenarios.
Additionally, the authors acknowledge that larger models can sometimes exhibit overconfident or less robust generalization compared to smaller models. This suggests that there may be tradeoffs or limitations to the advantages of scale when it comes to practical in-context learning applications.
Further research is needed to fully characterize the strengths, weaknesses, and underlying mechanisms driving in-context learning in large language models. Exploring how model architecture, training data, and other factors may modulate these capabilities would also be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper offers important insights into how the size of a language model affects its ability to learn new tasks from just a few contextual examples. Larger models exhibit distinct advantages, like faster learning and better generalization, compared to smaller models.
These findings have significant implications for the design and application of in-context learning systems. By understanding the model scaling effects, researchers and practitioners can better harness the power of large language models for few-shot problem solving, personalized assistance, and other real-world tasks that require rapid adaptation to new information.
While further research is needed, this work represents an important step forward in unraveling the intriguing properties of in-context learning in large-scale AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
Theoretical Understanding of In-Context Learning in Shallow Transformers with Unstructured Data
Yue Xing, Xiaofeng Lin, Chenheng Xu, Namjoon Suh, Qifan Song, Guang Cheng
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful models that can learn concepts at the inference stage via in-context learning (ICL). While theoretical studies, e.g., cite{zhang2023trained}, attempt to explain the mechanism of ICL, they assume the input $x_i$ and the output $y_i$ of each demonstration example are in the same token (i.e., structured data). However, in real practice, the examples are usually text input, and all words, regardless of their logic relationship, are stored in different tokens (i.e., unstructured data cite{wibisono2023role}). To understand how LLMs learn from the unstructured data in ICL, this paper studies the role of each component in the transformer architecture and provides a theoretical understanding to explain the success of the architecture. In particular, we consider a simple transformer with one/two attention layers and linear regression tasks for the ICL prediction. We observe that (1) a transformer with two layers of (self-)attentions with a look-ahead attention mask can learn from the prompt in the unstructured data, and (2) positional encoding can match the $x_i$ and $y_i$ tokens to achieve a better ICL performance.
6/19/2024
📉
How Do Nonlinear Transformers Learn and Generalize in In-Context Learning?
Hongkang Li, Meng Wang, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui, Pin-Yu Chen
0
0
Transformer-based large language models have displayed impressive in-context learning capabilities, where a pre-trained model can handle new tasks without fine-tuning by simply augmenting the query with some input-output examples from that task. Despite the empirical success, the mechanics of how to train a Transformer to achieve ICL and the corresponding ICL capacity is mostly elusive due to the technical challenges of analyzing the nonconvex training problems resulting from the nonlinear self-attention and nonlinear activation in Transformers. To the best of our knowledge, this paper provides the first theoretical analysis of the training dynamics of Transformers with nonlinear self-attention and nonlinear MLP, together with the ICL generalization capability of the resulting model. Focusing on a group of binary classification tasks, we train Transformers using data from a subset of these tasks and quantify the impact of various factors on the ICL generalization performance on the remaining unseen tasks with and without data distribution shifts. We also analyze how different components in the learned Transformers contribute to the ICL performance. Furthermore, we provide the first theoretical analysis of how model pruning affects ICL performance and prove that proper magnitude-based pruning can have a minimal impact on ICL while reducing inference costs. These theoretical findings are justified through numerical experiments.
6/18/2024
MLPs Learn In-Context
William L. Tong, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
In-context learning (ICL), the remarkable ability to solve a task from only input exemplars, has commonly been assumed to be a unique hallmark of Transformer models. In this study, we demonstrate that multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) can also learn in-context. Moreover, we find that MLPs, and the closely related MLP-Mixer models, learn in-context competitively with Transformers given the same compute budget. We further show that MLPs outperform Transformers on a subset of ICL tasks designed to test relational reasoning. These results suggest that in-context learning is not exclusive to Transformers and highlight the potential of exploring this phenomenon beyond attention-based architectures. In addition, MLPs' surprising success on relational tasks challenges prior assumptions about simple connectionist models. Altogether, our results endorse the broad trend that ``less inductive bias is better and contribute to the growing interest in all-MLP alternatives to task-specific architectures.
5/27/2024
Asymptotic theory of in-context learning by linear attention
Yue M. Lu, Mary I. Letey, Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth, Anindita Maiti, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
Transformers have a remarkable ability to learn and execute tasks based on examples provided within the input itself, without explicit prior training. It has been argued that this capability, known as in-context learning (ICL), is a cornerstone of Transformers' success, yet questions about the necessary sample complexity, pretraining task diversity, and context length for successful ICL remain unresolved. Here, we provide a precise answer to these questions in an exactly solvable model of ICL of a linear regression task by linear attention. We derive sharp asymptotics for the learning curve in a phenomenologically-rich scaling regime where the token dimension is taken to infinity; the context length and pretraining task diversity scale proportionally with the token dimension; and the number of pretraining examples scales quadratically. We demonstrate a double-descent learning curve with increasing pretraining examples, and uncover a phase transition in the model's behavior between low and high task diversity regimes: In the low diversity regime, the model tends toward memorization of training tasks, whereas in the high diversity regime, it achieves genuine in-context learning and generalization beyond the scope of pretrained tasks. These theoretical insights are empirically validated through experiments with both linear attention and full nonlinear Transformer architectures.
5/21/2024