What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis

2406.04216

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/11/2024 by Jiaoda Li, Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell

💬

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit an intriguing ability to learn a novel task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration, termed in-context learning (ICL). Understandably, a swath of research has been dedicated to uncovering the theories underpinning ICL. One popular hypothesis explains ICL by task selection. LLMs identify the task based on the demonstration and generalize it to the prompt. Another popular hypothesis is that ICL is a form of meta-learning, i.e., the models learn a learning algorithm at pre-training time and apply it to the demonstration. Finally, a third hypothesis argues that LLMs use the demonstration to select a composition of tasks learned during pre-training to perform ICL. In this paper, we empirically explore these three hypotheses that explain LLMs' ability to learn in context with a suite of experiments derived from common text classification tasks. We invalidate the first two hypotheses with counterexamples and provide evidence in support of the last hypothesis. Our results suggest an LLM could learn a novel task in context via composing tasks learned during pre-training.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores the ability of large language models to exploit cross-task context and generalize it to other tasks
  • Investigates the robustness and limitations of this context learning capability
  • Provides an empirical study on the impact of context learning in machine translation tasks
  • Examines why larger language models tend to exhibit stronger context learning abilities

Plain English Explanation

The provided research explores how powerful language models can use the context surrounding a task to improve their performance. These models are able to pick up on patterns and relationships across different tasks, and then apply that understanding to new situations. This relates to the paper on language models exploiting cross-task context.

However, the researchers also find that this context learning capability is not always robust - the models don't always generalize the context accurately or reliably. This connects to the paper on how context learning can generalize but not always robustly.

The paper includes an in-depth study on how this context learning affects machine translation, showing both the benefits and limitations. This ties to the empirical study on the impact of context learning in machine translation.

Ultimately, the research examines why larger language models tend to have a stronger ability to learn and leverage contextual information. This relates to the paper on why larger language models do better at context learning. The findings have important implications for how we design and deploy these powerful AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the ability of large language models to exploit cross-task context and generalize it to other tasks. The researchers designed a series of experiments to study this context learning capability and its limitations.

Relating to the paper on language models exploiting cross-task context, the experiments showed that language models were able to pick up on patterns and relationships across different tasks, and then apply that understanding to improve performance on new tasks.

However, as discussed in the paper on how context learning can generalize but not always robustly, the researchers also found that this context learning was not always robust. The models did not always generalize the contextual information accurately or reliably.

To further explore this, the empirical study on the impact of context learning in machine translation looked at how context learning affected performance on machine translation tasks. The results showed both benefits and limitations of the language models' ability to leverage contextual information.

Overall, the paper seeks to understand why larger language models tend to have a stronger capability for context learning, shedding light on the mechanisms and implications of this important AI capability.

Critical Analysis

The research provides valuable insights into the context learning abilities of large language models, but it also highlights some important caveats and areas for further exploration.

While the models were able to leverage cross-task context to improve performance, the finding that this capability is not always robust raises questions about the reliability and generalizability of the models' reasoning. The paper acknowledges that more work is needed to fully understand the limitations and failure modes of context learning.

Additionally, the empirical study on machine translation suggests that context learning may have trade-offs or unintended consequences in specific applications. Further research is warranted to understand how these context learning mechanisms interact with other aspects of model behavior and performance.

Relating to the paper on decomposing label space format discrimination, one could also question whether the models are truly learning meaningful contextual relationships, or if they are simply exploiting superficial patterns in the data. Disentangling these possibilities is an important area for future work.

Overall, the research represents an important step forward in understanding the context learning capabilities of large language models, but there remains much to be explored in terms of the robustness, limitations, and broader implications of this phenomenon.

Conclusion

This research delves into the fascinating ability of large language models to exploit cross-task context and generalize that understanding to improve performance on new tasks. The findings show that these models can pick up on subtle patterns and relationships, allowing them to leverage contextual information in powerful ways.

However, the work also highlights the limitations and lack of robustness in this context learning capability. The models do not always generalize the contextual information accurately or reliably, and there may be trade-offs or unintended consequences when applying this ability in specific domains like machine translation.

Ultimately, the research sheds light on an important capability of modern AI systems, while also raising important questions about their reasoning mechanisms and the need for continued exploration and refinement. As we strive to build more capable and trustworthy AI, understanding the nuances of context learning will be crucial.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Language Models can Exploit Cross-Task In-context Learning for Data-Scarce Novel Tasks

Language Models can Exploit Cross-Task In-context Learning for Data-Scarce Novel Tasks

Anwoy Chatterjee, Eshaan Tanwar, Subhabrata Dutta, Tanmoy Chakraborty

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed NLP with their remarkable In-context Learning (ICL) capabilities. Automated assistants based on LLMs are gaining popularity; however, adapting them to novel tasks is still challenging. While colossal models excel in zero-shot performance, their computational demands limit widespread use, and smaller language models struggle without context. This paper investigates whether LLMs can generalize from labeled examples of predefined tasks to novel tasks. Drawing inspiration from biological neurons and the mechanistic interpretation of the Transformer architecture, we explore the potential for information sharing across tasks. We design a cross-task prompting setup with three LLMs and show that LLMs achieve significant performance improvements despite no examples from the target task in the context. Cross-task prompting leads to a remarkable performance boost of 107% for LLaMA-2 7B, 18.6% for LLaMA-2 13B, and 3.2% for GPT 3.5 on average over zero-shot prompting, and performs comparable to standard in-context learning. The effectiveness of generating pseudo-labels for in-task examples is demonstrated, and our analyses reveal a strong correlation between the effect of cross-task examples and model activation similarities in source and target input tokens. This paper offers a first-of-its-kind exploration of LLMs' ability to solve novel tasks based on contextual signals from different task examples.

Read more

6/13/2024

🌀

In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntax

Aaron Mueller, Albert Webson, Jackson Petty, Tal Linzen

YC

0

Reddit

0

In-context learning (ICL) is now a common method for teaching large language models (LLMs) new tasks: given labeled examples in the input context, the LLM learns to perform the task without weight updates. Do models guided via ICL infer the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or do they rely on superficial heuristics that only generalize to identically distributed examples? We address this question using transformations tasks and an NLI task that assess sensitivity to syntax - a requirement for robust language understanding. We further investigate whether out-of-distribution generalization can be improved via chain-of-thought prompting, where the model is provided with a sequence of intermediate computation steps that illustrate how the task ought to be performed. In experiments with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families, we find large variance across LMs. The variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and supervision methods than by model size; in particular, models pre-trained on code generalize better, and benefit more from chain-of-thought prompting.

Read more

4/11/2024

🌿

A Survey on In-context Learning

Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, Zhifang Sui

YC

0

Reddit

0

With the increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs), in-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a new paradigm for natural language processing (NLP), where LLMs make predictions based on contexts augmented with a few examples. It has been a significant trend to explore ICL to evaluate and extrapolate the ability of LLMs. In this paper, we aim to survey and summarize the progress and challenges of ICL. We first present a formal definition of ICL and clarify its correlation to related studies. Then, we organize and discuss advanced techniques, including training strategies, prompt designing strategies, and related analysis. Additionally, we explore various ICL application scenarios, such as data engineering and knowledge updating. Finally, we address the challenges of ICL and suggest potential directions for further research. We hope that our work can encourage more research on uncovering how ICL works and improving ICL.

Read more

6/19/2024

📈

An Empirical Study of In-context Learning in LLMs for Machine Translation

Pranjal A. Chitale, Jay Gala, Raj Dabre

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent interest has surged in employing Large Language Models (LLMs) for machine translation (MT) via in-context learning (ICL) (Vilar et al., 2023). Most prior studies primarily focus on optimizing translation quality, with limited attention to understanding the specific aspects of ICL that influence the said quality. To this end, we perform the first of its kind, an exhaustive study of in-context learning for machine translation. We first establish that ICL is primarily example-driven and not instruction-driven. Following this, we conduct an extensive exploration of various aspects of the examples to understand their influence on downstream performance. Our analysis includes factors such as quality and quantity of demonstrations, spatial proximity, and source versus target originality. Further, we also investigate challenging scenarios involving indirectness and misalignment of examples to understand the limits of ICL. While we establish the significance of the quality of the target distribution over the source distribution of demonstrations, we further observe that perturbations sometimes act as regularizers, resulting in performance improvements. Surprisingly, ICL does not necessitate examples from the same task, and a related task with the same target distribution proves sufficient. We hope that our study acts as a guiding resource for considerations in utilizing ICL for MT. Our code is available on https://github.com/PranjalChitale/in-context-mt-analysis.

Read more

6/6/2024