Threat Behavior Textual Search by Attention Graph Isomorphism

Read original: arXiv:2404.10944 - Published 4/19/2024 by Chanwoo Bae, Guanhong Tao, Zhuo Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang
Total Score

0

Threat Behavior Textual Search by Attention Graph Isomorphism

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new method for searching textual threat behavior data using attention graph isomorphism.
  • The approach represents threat behaviors as attention graphs and performs graph-based search to find similar behaviors.
  • The authors claim this method can improve the accuracy and speed of threat detection compared to traditional keyword-based search.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new technique for searching through text-based data about potential cyber threats or malicious behaviors. Instead of simply looking for specific keywords, their method represents the patterns and relationships in the text as a type of graph structure called an "attention graph."

This allows them to perform a more sophisticated search, looking for similarities in the overall structure and flow of the information, rather than just matching surface-level words. The key idea is that this "attention graph isomorphism" approach can better capture the underlying meaning and context of the threat behaviors, which can be missed by simpler keyword searches.

The researchers claim this graph-based search method is more accurate and efficient at identifying relevant threat data, compared to traditional text-based techniques. This could be very valuable for cybersecurity professionals trying to quickly surface important threat intelligence from large volumes of textual data.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel attention graph isomorphism approach for threat behavior textual search. The core idea is to represent threat behaviors as attention graphs - graph structures that capture the semantic and syntactic relationships in the text using attention mechanisms.

By casting the search problem as a graph isomorphism task, the method can identify similar threat behaviors even if the surface-level textual content differs. This is a key advantage over traditional keyword-based search, which may miss contextual nuances.

The authors evaluate their approach on a large corpus of threat behavior data, demonstrating improved accuracy and speed compared to baselines. They also provide techniques to make the attention graph interpretation more human-interpretable for cybersecurity analysts.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach for textual threat behavior search. The key strength is the use of attention graphs, which can capture more semantic and syntactic nuance than simple keyword matching. This aligns well with the challenges of interpreting threat intelligence from unstructured text data.

However, the authors acknowledge some limitations. The attention graph construction and isomorphism algorithms may not scale well to extremely large datasets. There could also be challenges in creating high-quality training data for the underlying language models.

Additionally, while the interpretability techniques are helpful, the overall system complexity may make it difficult for human analysts to fully audit and trust the search results. Further research is needed to address these scalability and transparency concerns.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing a new paradigm for threat behavior search. With further refinement and validation, this approach could become an important tool in the cybersecurity analyst's toolkit.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel attention graph isomorphism method for improving textual search of threat behavior data. By representing threat behaviors as attention graphs and performing graph-based similarity search, the approach can identify relevant intelligence more accurately and efficiently than traditional keyword-based techniques.

The authors demonstrate the potential of this approach through experiments on a large threat corpus. While some scalability and interpretability challenges remain, this work represents an important step forward in leveraging graph-based representations for enhanced cybersecurity threat detection and analysis. As the volume and complexity of threat data continues to grow, innovations like this will be crucial for security teams to keep pace.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Threat Behavior Textual Search by Attention Graph Isomorphism
Total Score

0

Threat Behavior Textual Search by Attention Graph Isomorphism

Chanwoo Bae, Guanhong Tao, Zhuo Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang

Cyber attacks cause over $1 trillion loss every year. An important task for cyber security analysts is attack forensics. It entails understanding malware behaviors and attack origins. However, existing automated or manual malware analysis can only disclose a subset of behaviors due to inherent difficulties (e.g., malware cloaking and obfuscation). As such, analysts often resort to text search techniques to identify existing malware reports based on the symptoms they observe, exploiting the fact that malware samples share a lot of similarity, especially those from the same origin. In this paper, we propose a novel malware behavior search technique that is based on graph isomorphism at the attention layers of Transformer models. We also compose a large dataset collected from various agencies to facilitate such research. Our technique outperforms state-of-the-art methods, such as those based on sentence embeddings and keywords by 6-14%. In the case study of 10 real-world malwares, our technique can correctly attribute 8 of them to their ground truth origins while using Google only works for 3 cases.

Read more

4/19/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Semantic Stealth: Adversarial Text Attacks on NLP Using Several Methods

Roopkatha Dey, Aivy Debnath, Sayak Kumar Dutta, Kaustav Ghosh, Arijit Mitra, Arghya Roy Chowdhury, Jaydip Sen

In various real-world applications such as machine translation, sentiment analysis, and question answering, a pivotal role is played by NLP models, facilitating efficient communication and decision-making processes in domains ranging from healthcare to finance. However, a significant challenge is posed to the robustness of these natural language processing models by text adversarial attacks. These attacks involve the deliberate manipulation of input text to mislead the predictions of the model while maintaining human interpretability. Despite the remarkable performance achieved by state-of-the-art models like BERT in various natural language processing tasks, they are found to remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations in the input text. In addressing the vulnerability of text classifiers to adversarial attacks, three distinct attack mechanisms are explored in this paper using the victim model BERT: BERT-on-BERT attack, PWWS attack, and Fraud Bargain's Attack (FBA). Leveraging the IMDB, AG News, and SST2 datasets, a thorough comparative analysis is conducted to assess the effectiveness of these attacks on the BERT classifier model. It is revealed by the analysis that PWWS emerges as the most potent adversary, consistently outperforming other methods across multiple evaluation scenarios, thereby emphasizing its efficacy in generating adversarial examples for text classification. Through comprehensive experimentation, the performance of these attacks is assessed and the findings indicate that the PWWS attack outperforms others, demonstrating lower runtime, higher accuracy, and favorable semantic similarity scores. The key insight of this paper lies in the assessment of the relative performances of three prevalent state-of-the-art attack mechanisms.

Read more

4/9/2024

Intruding with Words: Towards Understanding Graph Injection Attacks at the Text Level
Total Score

0

Intruding with Words: Towards Understanding Graph Injection Attacks at the Text Level

Runlin Lei, Yuwei Hu, Yuchen Ren, Zhewei Wei

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) excel across various applications but remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, particularly Graph Injection Attacks (GIAs), which inject malicious nodes into the original graph and pose realistic threats. Text-attributed graphs (TAGs), where nodes are associated with textual features, are crucial due to their prevalence in real-world applications and are commonly used to evaluate these vulnerabilities. However, existing research only focuses on embedding-level GIAs, which inject node embeddings rather than actual textual content, limiting their applicability and simplifying detection. In this paper, we pioneer the exploration of GIAs at the text level, presenting three novel attack designs that inject textual content into the graph. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we demonstrate that text interpretability, a factor previously overlooked at the embedding level, plays a crucial role in attack strength. Among the designs we investigate, the Word-frequency-based Text-level GIA (WTGIA) is particularly notable for its balance between performance and interpretability. Despite the success of WTGIA, we discover that defenders can easily enhance their defenses with customized text embedding methods or large language model (LLM)--based predictors. These insights underscore the necessity for further research into the potential and practical significance of text-level GIAs.

Read more

5/28/2024

Using Retriever Augmented Large Language Models for Attack Graph Generation
Total Score

0

Using Retriever Augmented Large Language Models for Attack Graph Generation

Renascence Tarafder Prapty, Ashish Kundu, Arun Iyengar

As the complexity of modern systems increases, so does the importance of assessing their security posture through effective vulnerability management and threat modeling techniques. One powerful tool in the arsenal of cybersecurity professionals is the attack graph, a representation of all potential attack paths within a system that an adversary might exploit to achieve a certain objective. Traditional methods of generating attack graphs involve expert knowledge, manual curation, and computational algorithms that might not cover the entire threat landscape due to the ever-evolving nature of vulnerabilities and exploits. This paper explores the approach of leveraging large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, to automate the generation of attack graphs by intelligently chaining Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) based on their preconditions and effects. It also shows how to utilize LLMs to create attack graphs from threat reports.

Read more

8/13/2024