Tilting the Odds at the Lottery: the Interplay of Overparameterisation and Curricula in Neural Networks

Read original: arXiv:2406.01589 - Published 6/4/2024 by Stefano Sarao Mannelli, Yaraslau Ivashinka, Andrew Saxe, Luca Saglietti
Total Score

0

Tilting the Odds at the Lottery: the Interplay of Overparameterisation and Curricula in Neural Networks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the interplay between overparameterization and curriculum learning in neural networks.
  • The authors investigate how these two factors can interact to influence the performance and generalization of neural networks.
  • They present novel theoretical and empirical insights into the dynamics of neural network training under different conditions.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks are a powerful type of machine learning model that can learn complex patterns in data. However, they can be challenging to train, as their performance can be sensitive to factors like the network architecture and the training process.

This paper looks at two important factors in neural network training: overparameterization and curriculum learning. Overparameterization refers to using a neural network with many more parameters than needed to solve a task. Curriculum learning involves gradually increasing the difficulty of the training data over time.

The authors find that overparameterization and curriculum learning can interact in interesting ways. In some cases, overparameterization can actually help a neural network learn better, especially when combined with a good curriculum. This is because the extra parameters provide the model with more flexibility to adapt to the gradually increasing difficulty of the training data.

The paper provides both theoretical analysis and empirical experiments to support these insights. The findings have important implications for how we design and train neural networks to achieve optimal performance and generalization.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by reviewing related work on overparameterization and curriculum learning in neural networks. It then presents a theoretical analysis of how these two factors can interact.

The key idea is that overparameterization can provide neural networks with the capacity to effectively learn from a curriculum of increasingly difficult training data. As the task difficulty increases, the extra parameters allow the model to adapt and continue improving its performance.

To test this hypothesis, the authors design a series of experiments using synthetic and real-world datasets. They compare the performance of overparameterized neural networks trained with and without curriculum learning.

The results show that overparameterized models can significantly outperform their underparameterized counterparts when trained with a well-designed curriculum. This effect is particularly pronounced on more challenging tasks.

The authors also investigate the dynamics of the training process and find that overparameterization can lead to faster convergence and better generalization under certain conditions.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful and well-designed study on an important topic in machine learning. The theoretical analysis provides a solid foundation for understanding the interplay between overparameterization and curriculum learning.

However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research. For example, they note that the optimal curriculum design can be task-dependent, and more work is needed to understand how to automatically generate effective curricula.

Additionally, the experiments are mostly focused on synthetic or relatively simple real-world datasets. It would be interesting to see how these insights apply to more complex, real-world problems that are commonly encountered in practical machine learning applications.

Finally, the paper does not address some of the potential downsides or risks of overparameterization, such as the increased computational and memory requirements, or the potential for overfitting. A more balanced discussion of these tradeoffs would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of this research.

Conclusion

This paper offers valuable insights into the complex dynamics of neural network training, demonstrating how overparameterization and curriculum learning can work together to improve performance and generalization.

The findings have important implications for the design and optimization of neural network architectures and training regimes. They suggest that carefully considering these factors can lead to significant improvements in the effectiveness and robustness of machine learning models.

As the field of deep learning continues to advance, research like this that probes the underlying mechanisms of neural network behavior will be crucial for developing more reliable and powerful AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Tilting the Odds at the Lottery: the Interplay of Overparameterisation and Curricula in Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Tilting the Odds at the Lottery: the Interplay of Overparameterisation and Curricula in Neural Networks

Stefano Sarao Mannelli, Yaraslau Ivashinka, Andrew Saxe, Luca Saglietti

A wide range of empirical and theoretical works have shown that overparameterisation can amplify the performance of neural networks. According to the lottery ticket hypothesis, overparameterised networks have an increased chance of containing a sub-network that is well-initialised to solve the task at hand. A more parsimonious approach, inspired by animal learning, consists in guiding the learner towards solving the task by curating the order of the examples, i.e. providing a curriculum. However, this learning strategy seems to be hardly beneficial in deep learning applications. In this work, we undertake an analytical study that connects curriculum learning and overparameterisation. In particular, we investigate their interplay in the online learning setting for a 2-layer network in the XOR-like Gaussian Mixture problem. Our results show that a high degree of overparameterisation -- while simplifying the problem -- can limit the benefit from curricula, providing a theoretical account of the ineffectiveness of curricula in deep learning.

Read more

6/4/2024

Over-parameterization and Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks: An Overview and Empirical Analysis
Total Score

0

Over-parameterization and Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks: An Overview and Empirical Analysis

Zhang Chen, Luca Demetrio, Srishti Gupta, Xiaoyi Feng, Zhaoqiang Xia, Antonio Emanuele Cin`a, Maura Pintor, Luca Oneto, Ambra Demontis, Battista Biggio, Fabio Roli

Thanks to their extensive capacity, over-parameterized neural networks exhibit superior predictive capabilities and generalization. However, having a large parameter space is considered one of the main suspects of the neural networks' vulnerability to adversarial example -- input samples crafted ad-hoc to induce a desired misclassification. Relevant literature has claimed contradictory remarks in support of and against the robustness of over-parameterized networks. These contradictory findings might be due to the failure of the attack employed to evaluate the networks' robustness. Previous research has demonstrated that depending on the considered model, the algorithm employed to generate adversarial examples may not function properly, leading to overestimating the model's robustness. In this work, we empirically study the robustness of over-parameterized networks against adversarial examples. However, unlike the previous works, we also evaluate the considered attack's reliability to support the results' veracity. Our results show that over-parameterized networks are robust against adversarial attacks as opposed to their under-parameterized counterparts.

Read more

6/17/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

Benign, Tempered, or Catastrophic: A Taxonomy of Overfitting

Neil Mallinar, James B. Simon, Amirhesam Abedsoltan, Parthe Pandit, Mikhail Belkin, Preetum Nakkiran

The practical success of overparameterized neural networks has motivated the recent scientific study of interpolating methods, which perfectly fit their training data. Certain interpolating methods, including neural networks, can fit noisy training data without catastrophically bad test performance, in defiance of standard intuitions from statistical learning theory. Aiming to explain this, a body of recent work has studied benign overfitting, a phenomenon where some interpolating methods approach Bayes optimality, even in the presence of noise. In this work we argue that while benign overfitting has been instructive and fruitful to study, many real interpolating methods like neural networks do not fit benignly: modest noise in the training set causes nonzero (but non-infinite) excess risk at test time, implying these models are neither benign nor catastrophic but rather fall in an intermediate regime. We call this intermediate regime tempered overfitting, and we initiate its systematic study. We first explore this phenomenon in the context of kernel (ridge) regression (KR) by obtaining conditions on the ridge parameter and kernel eigenspectrum under which KR exhibits each of the three behaviors. We find that kernels with powerlaw spectra, including Laplace kernels and ReLU neural tangent kernels, exhibit tempered overfitting. We then empirically study deep neural networks through the lens of our taxonomy, and find that those trained to interpolation are tempered, while those stopped early are benign. We hope our work leads to a more refined understanding of overfitting in modern learning.

Read more

7/17/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

The lazy (NTK) and rich ($mu$P) regimes: a gentle tutorial

Dhruva Karkada

A central theme of the modern machine learning paradigm is that larger neural networks achieve better performance on a variety of metrics. Theoretical analyses of these overparameterized models have recently centered around studying very wide neural networks. In this tutorial, we provide a nonrigorous but illustrative derivation of the following fact: in order to train wide networks effectively, there is only one degree of freedom in choosing hyperparameters such as the learning rate and the size of the initial weights. This degree of freedom controls the richness of training behavior: at minimum, the wide network trains lazily like a kernel machine, and at maximum, it exhibits feature learning in the so-called $mu$P regime. In this paper, we explain this richness scale, synthesize recent research results into a coherent whole, offer new perspectives and intuitions, and provide empirical evidence supporting our claims. In doing so, we hope to encourage further study of the richness scale, as it may be key to developing a scientific theory of feature learning in practical deep neural networks.

Read more

5/1/2024