Time, Travel, and Energy in the Uniform Dispersion Problem

Read original: arXiv:2404.19564 - Published 5/1/2024 by Michael Amir, Alfred M. Bruckstein
Total Score

0

Time, Travel, and Energy in the Uniform Dispersion Problem

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the relationship between time, travel, and energy in the context of the uniform dispersion problem.
  • It investigates how the time and energy required for agents to disperse uniformly across a given area are affected by factors such as the initial distribution of agents and the maximum speed of the agents.
  • The paper presents analytical results and simulation experiments to understand the trade-offs between time, travel, and energy in this problem.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a problem where a group of agents (e.g., robots or vehicles) need to spread out evenly across an area. The researchers wanted to understand how the time it takes for the agents to spread out, the distance they have to travel, and the energy they need to use are all connected.

For example, if the agents start very close together, they might be able to spread out quickly, but they would have to travel farther. Or if the agents move faster, they can spread out faster, but it might use more energy. The paper analyzes these trade-offs mathematically and through computer simulations to see how different factors affect the time, travel, and energy required.

Some key insights from the paper include:

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the uniform dispersion problem, where a set of agents must spread out evenly across a given area. The authors consider how the time required for the agents to disperse, the total distance traveled by the agents, and the energy consumed by the agents are related.

Mathematically, the authors model the problem as a differential equation that describes the evolution of the agent distribution over time. They derive analytical expressions for the time, travel, and energy metrics as functions of the initial agent distribution and the maximum agent speed.

Through simulation experiments, the authors explore how these metrics are affected by factors such as the initial agent distribution and the maximum agent speed. They find that there can be a trade-off between minimizing time, minimizing travel, and minimizing energy, and that the optimal strategy depends on the specific problem constraints and priorities.

The insights from this work can inform the design of distributed systems where uniform dispersion is important, such as in autonomous vehicle coordination or task allocation problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of the uniform dispersion problem, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. The model assumes a simplified, idealized setting with homogeneous agents and a static environment. In real-world applications, there may be more complex factors, such as agent heterogeneity, dynamic obstacles, and communication constraints, that could affect the time, travel, and energy metrics.

  2. The simulations only consider a small number of agents in a 2D environment. It would be interesting to see how the results scale to larger systems and higher-dimensional spaces, which are more representative of real-world applications.

  3. The paper does not explore the impact of different agent coordination strategies or decision-making algorithms on the performance metrics. Investigating more sophisticated distributed control approaches could lead to further insights.

  4. While the paper discusses potential applications in areas like autonomous vehicles and task allocation, it does not provide a concrete example of how the insights from this work could be used to inform the design of such systems. More explicit connections to real-world use cases would strengthen the practical relevance of the research.

Overall, the paper presents a solid theoretical and experimental analysis of the uniform dispersion problem, but further research is needed to address the aforementioned limitations and expand the applicability of the findings to more complex, real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

This paper investigates the relationships between time, travel, and energy in the context of the uniform dispersion problem, where a group of agents must spread out evenly across a given area. The authors derive analytical expressions for these metrics and explore their trade-offs through simulation experiments.

The key insights from this work include the significant impact of the initial agent distribution on the time and energy required for dispersion, as well as the existence of a sweet spot that balances the competing objectives of minimizing time, travel, and energy. These findings can inform the design of distributed systems where uniform dispersion is important, such as autonomous vehicle coordination and task allocation in multi-agent environments.

While the paper presents a solid theoretical and empirical analysis, further research is needed to address the limitations of the simplified model and explore the applicability of the results to more complex, real-world scenarios. Nonetheless, this work contributes valuable insights to the understanding of the fundamental trade-offs involved in the uniform dispersion problem.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Time, Travel, and Energy in the Uniform Dispersion Problem
Total Score

0

Time, Travel, and Energy in the Uniform Dispersion Problem

Michael Amir, Alfred M. Bruckstein

We investigate the algorithmic problem of uniformly dispersing a swarm of robots in an unknown, gridlike environment. In this setting, our goal is to comprehensively study the relationships between performance metrics and robot capabilities. We introduce a formal model comparing dispersion algorithms based on makespan, traveled distance, energy consumption, sensing, communication, and memory. Using this framework, we classify several uniform dispersion algorithms according to their capability requirements and performance. We prove that while makespan and travel can be minimized in all environments, energy cannot, as long as the swarm's sensing range is bounded. In contrast, we show that energy can be minimized even by simple, ``ant-like robots in synchronous settings and asymptotically minimized in asynchronous settings, provided the environment is topologically simply connected. Our findings offer insights into fundamental limitations that arise when designing swarm robotics systems for exploring unknown environments, highlighting the impact of environment's topology on the feasibility of energy-efficient dispersion.

Read more

5/1/2024

Near-linear Time Dispersion of Mobile Agents
Total Score

0

Near-linear Time Dispersion of Mobile Agents

Yuichi Sudo, Masahiro Shibata, Junya Nakamura, Yonghwan Kim, Toshimitsu Masuzawa

Consider that there are $kle n$ agents in a simple, connected, and undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with $n$ nodes and $m$ edges. The goal of the dispersion problem is to move these $k$ agents to mutually distinct nodes. Agents can communicate only when they are at the same node, and no other communication means, such as whiteboards, are available. We assume that the agents operate synchronously. We consider two scenarios: when all agents are initially located at a single node (rooted setting) and when they are initially distributed over one or more nodes (general setting). Kshemkalyani and Sharma presented a dispersion algorithm for the general setting, which uses $O(m_k)$ time and $log(k + Delta)$ bits of memory per agent [OPODIS 2021], where $m_k$ is the maximum number of edges in any induced subgraph of $G$ with $k$ nodes, and $Delta$ is the maximum degree of $G$. This algorithm is currently the fastest in the literature, as no $o(m_k)$-time algorithm has been discovered, even for the rooted setting. In this paper, we present significantly faster algorithms for both the rooted and the general settings. First, we present an algorithm for the rooted setting that solves the dispersion problem in $O(klog min(k,Delta))=O(klog k)$ time using $O(log (k+Delta))$ bits of memory per agent. Next, we propose an algorithm for the general setting that achieves dispersion in $O(k log k cdot log min(k,Delta))=O(k log^2 k)$ time using $O(log (k+Delta))$ bits. Finally, for the rooted setting, we give a time-optimal (i.e.,~$O(k)$-time) algorithm with $O(Delta+log k)$ bits of space per agent. All algorithms presented in this paper work only in the synchronous setting, while several algorithms in the literature, including the one given by Kshemkalyani and Sharma at OPODIS 2021, work in the asynchronous setting.

Read more

8/21/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Optimizing Robot Dispersion on Grids: with and without Fault Tolerance

Rik Banerjee, Manish Kumar, Anisur Rahaman Molla

The introduction and study of dispersing mobile robots across the nodes of an anonymous graph have recently gained traction and have been explored within various graph classes and settings. While optimal dispersion solution was established for {em oriented} grids [Kshemkalyani et al., WALCOM 2020], a significant unresolved question pertains to whether achieving optimal dispersion is feasible on an {em unoriented} grid. This paper investigates the dispersion problem on unoriented grids, considering both non-faulty and faulty robots. The challenge posed by unoriented grids lies in the absence of a clear sense of direction for a single robot moving between nodes, as opposed to the straightforward navigation of oriented grids. We present three deterministic algorithms tailored to our robot model. The first and second algorithms deal with the dispersion of faulty and non-faulty robots, ensuring both time and memory optimization in oriented and unoriented grids, respectively. Faulty robots that are prone to crashing at any time, causing permanent failure. In both settings, we achieve dispersion in $O(sqrt{n})$ rounds while requiring $O(log n)$ bits of memory per robot. The third algorithm tackles faulty robots prone to crash faults in an unoriented grid. In this scenario, our algorithm operates within $O(sqrt{n} log n)$ time and uses $O(sqrt{n} log n)$ bits of memory per robot. The robots need to know the value of $n$ for termination.

Read more

5/6/2024

Optimal Dispersion of Silent Robots in a Ring
Total Score

0

Optimal Dispersion of Silent Robots in a Ring

Bibhuti Das, Barun Gorain, Kaushik Mondal, Krishnendu Mukhopadhyaya, Supantha Pandit

Given a set of co-located mobile robots in an unknown anonymous graph, the robots must relocate themselves in distinct graph nodes to solve the dispersion problem. In this paper, we consider the dispersion problem for silent robots cite{gorain2024collaborative}, i.e., no direct, explicit communication between any two robots placed in the nodes of an oriented $n$ node ring network. The robots operate in synchronous rounds. The dispersion problem for silent mobile robots has been studied in arbitrary graphs where the robots start from a single source. In this paper, we focus on the dispersion problem for silent mobile robots where robots can start from multiple sources. The robots have unique labels from a range $[0,;L]$ for some positive integer $L$. Any two co-located robots do not have the information about the label of the other robot. The robots have weak multiplicity detection capability, which means they can determine if it is alone on a node. The robots are assumed to be able to identify an increase or decrease in the number of robots present on a node in a particular round. However, the robots can not get the exact number of increase or decrease in the number of robots. We have proposed a deterministic distributed algorithm that solves the dispersion of $k$ robots in an oriented ring in $O(log L+k)$ synchronous rounds with $O(log L)$ bits of memory for each robot. A lower bound $Omega(log L+k)$ on time for the dispersion of $k$ robots on a ring network is presented to establish the optimality of the proposed algorithm.

Read more

8/13/2024