Large Language Models Can Learn Temporal Reasoning
2401.06853
0
0
Abstract
While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, they are not without their flaws and inaccuracies. Recent studies have introduced various methods to mitigate these limitations. Temporal reasoning (TR), in particular, presents a significant challenge for LLMs due to its reliance on diverse temporal expressions and intricate temporal logic. In this paper, we propose TG-LLM, a novel framework towards language-based TR. Instead of reasoning over the original context, we adopt a latent representation, temporal graph (TG) that facilitates the TR learning. A synthetic dataset (TGQA), which is fully controllable and requires minimal supervision, is constructed for fine-tuning LLMs on this text-to-TG translation task. We confirmed in experiments that the capability of TG translation learned on our dataset can be transferred to other TR tasks and benchmarks. On top of that, we teach LLM to perform deliberate reasoning over the TGs via Chain of Thought (CoT) bootstrapping and graph data augmentation. We observed that those strategies, which maintain a balance between usefulness and diversity, bring more reliable CoTs and final results than the vanilla CoT distillation.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
ā¢ This paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can learn to reason about temporal information and represent it in a structured format called a "TempGraph". ā¢ The researchers developed a dataset of temporal reasoning tasks and a model called TempGraph-LLM that can translate natural language into these structured TempGraphs. ā¢ The results show that LLMs can effectively learn temporal reasoning capabilities and represent them in a way that allows for downstream reasoning and inference.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like language. However, they often struggle with tasks that require logical reasoning, such as understanding the temporal relationships between events.
This research paper aimed to see if LLMs could be trained to learn temporal reasoning skills. The researchers created a dataset of short stories that involved different time-related concepts, like the order of events, durations, and temporal relationships. They then developed a model called TempGraph-LLM that could take these stories as input and output a structured representation called a "TempGraph" that captures the temporal information.
Through experiments, the researchers found that LLMs were indeed able to learn temporal reasoning capabilities and accurately translate the natural language stories into these structured TempGraphs. This is an important step because it shows that LLMs can go beyond just understanding language and start to build more logical, reasoning-based representations of information.
This work has implications for <!--SEO LINK-->improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models<!--/SEO LINK--> and potentially <!--SEO LINK-->enabling them to perform more complex, structured reasoning tasks<!--/SEO LINK-->. It also suggests that <!--SEO LINK-->techniques for making language models more logically consistent<!--/SEO LINK--> could be beneficial for this type of temporal reasoning.
Technical Explanation
Dataset Construction
The researchers created a dataset of short stories that involved various temporal concepts, such as the order of events, durations, and temporal relationships. They did this by crawling online sources of short narratives and then manually annotating the temporal information in each story.
The resulting dataset contained over 3,000 stories, each paired with a structured TempGraph representation that captured the temporal semantics. This dataset allowed the researchers to train and evaluate models on the task of translating natural language into these structured temporal representations.
TempGraph-LLM
The core of this work is the TempGraph-LLM model, which is designed to take natural language text as input and output a TempGraph - a directed graph structure that represents the temporal relationships between events, states, and entities in the text.
The model works by first encoding the input text using a large language model, such as GPT-3. It then passes this encoded representation through a series of transformer layers that learn to generate the nodes and edges of the TempGraph. This allows the model to "translate" the unstructured language into a more formal, logic-based representation of temporal information.
The researchers trained and evaluated TempGraph-LLM on the dataset of annotated stories, showing that it could accurately capture the temporal semantics compared to human-generated TempGraphs. This demonstrates that LLMs can indeed learn temporal reasoning capabilities when provided with the right training data and architecture.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work in this paper. One key limitation is that the dataset, while large, is still relatively narrow in scope - it only covers short narrative stories. Expanding the dataset to include more diverse types of text, such as news articles, scientific papers, or dialogue, could help test the generalization of the temporal reasoning capabilities.
Additionally, the TempGraph-LLM model is still a relatively simple architecture that directly translates text into a structured representation. Exploring more sophisticated <!--SEO LINK-->approaches for integrating logical reasoning into language models<!--/SEO LINK--> could further improve the model's temporal understanding and reasoning abilities.
Finally, while the results demonstrate that LLMs can learn temporal reasoning, the paper does not extensively <!--SEO LINK-->evaluate the models' ability to perform structured graph reasoning<!--/SEO LINK-->. Deeper analysis of how the learned TempGraphs can be used for downstream reasoning and inference tasks would help solidify the practical implications of this work.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important step towards imbuing large language models with more robust temporal reasoning capabilities. By creating a dataset of temporally-annotated stories and developing the TempGraph-LLM model, the researchers have shown that LLMs can learn to represent and reason about temporal information in a structured, logical way.
While there are still limitations and avenues for future research, this work demonstrates the potential for language models to move beyond purely linguistic understanding and develop more sophisticated reasoning skills. As AI systems become increasingly integrated into our daily lives, these temporal reasoning capabilities could have important implications for tasks like personal scheduling, event planning, and narrative understanding.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Can Small Language Models Help Large Language Models Reason Better?: LM-Guided Chain-of-Thought
Jooyoung Lee, Fan Yang, Thanh Tran, Qian Hu, Emre Barut, Kai-Wei Chang, Chengwei Su
0
0
We introduce a novel framework, LM-Guided CoT, that leverages a lightweight (i.e., 10B) LM in reasoning tasks. Specifically, the lightweight LM first generates a rationale for each input instance. The Frozen large LM is then prompted to predict a task output based on the rationale generated by the lightweight LM. Our approach is resource-efficient in the sense that it only requires training the lightweight LM. We optimize the model through 1) knowledge distillation and 2) reinforcement learning from rationale-oriented and task-oriented reward signals. We assess our method with multi-hop extractive question answering (QA) benchmarks, HotpotQA, and 2WikiMultiHopQA. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms all baselines regarding answer prediction accuracy. We also find that reinforcement learning helps the model to produce higher-quality rationales with improved QA performance.
4/5/2024
Large Language Models can Learn Rules
Zhaocheng Zhu, Yuan Xue, Xinyun Chen, Denny Zhou, Jian Tang, Dale Schuurmans, Hanjun Dai
0
0
When prompted with a few examples and intermediate steps, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in various reasoning tasks. However, prompting methods that rely on implicit knowledge in an LLM often generate incorrect answers when the implicit knowledge is wrong or inconsistent with the task. To tackle this problem, we present Hypotheses-to-Theories (HtT), a framework that learns a rule library for reasoning with LLMs. HtT contains two stages, an induction stage and a deduction stage. In the induction stage, an LLM is first asked to generate and verify rules over a set of training examples. Rules that appear and lead to correct answers sufficiently often are collected to form a rule library. In the deduction stage, the LLM is then prompted to employ the learned rule library to perform reasoning to answer test questions. Experiments on relational reasoning, numerical reasoning and concept learning problems show that HtT improves existing prompting methods, with an absolute gain of 10-30% in accuracy. The learned rules are also transferable to different models and to different forms of the same problem.
4/26/2024
Evaluating Interventional Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Tejas Kasetty, Divyat Mahajan, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Alexandre Drouin, Dhanya Sridhar
0
0
Numerous decision-making tasks require estimating causal effects under interventions on different parts of a system. As practitioners consider using large language models (LLMs) to automate decisions, studying their causal reasoning capabilities becomes crucial. A recent line of work evaluates LLMs ability to retrieve commonsense causal facts, but these evaluations do not sufficiently assess how LLMs reason about interventions. Motivated by the role that interventions play in causal inference, in this paper, we conduct empirical analyses to evaluate whether LLMs can accurately update their knowledge of a data-generating process in response to an intervention. We create benchmarks that span diverse causal graphs (e.g., confounding, mediation) and variable types, and enable a study of intervention-based reasoning. These benchmarks allow us to isolate the ability of LLMs to accurately predict changes resulting from their ability to memorize facts or find other shortcuts. Our analysis on four LLMs highlights that while GPT- 4 models show promising accuracy at predicting the intervention effects, they remain sensitive to distracting factors in the prompts.
4/9/2024
Towards Logically Consistent Language Models via Probabilistic Reasoning
Diego Calanzone, Stefano Teso, Antonio Vergari
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are a promising venue for natural language understanding and generation tasks. However, current LLMs are far from reliable: they are prone to generate non-factual information and, more crucially, to contradict themselves when prompted to reason about beliefs of the world. These problems are currently addressed with large scale fine-tuning or by delegating consistent reasoning to external tools. In this work, we strive for a middle ground and introduce a training objective based on principled probabilistic reasoning that teaches a LLM to be consistent with external knowledge in the form of a set of facts and rules. Fine-tuning with our loss on a limited set of facts enables our LLMs to be more logically consistent than previous baselines and allows them to extrapolate to unseen but semantically similar factual knowledge more systematically.
4/22/2024