Tool-Planner: Dynamic Solution Tree Planning for Large Language Model with Tool Clustering

Read original: arXiv:2406.03807 - Published 6/7/2024 by Yanming Liu, Xinyue Peng, Yuwei Zhang, Jiannan Cao, Xuhong Zhang, Sheng Cheng, Xun Wang, Jianwei Yin, Tianyu Du
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, enabling them to solve complex problems.
  • This has led to the development of tool learning, where LLMs are provided with examples of tool usage and their corresponding functions, allowing them to formulate plans and execute each tool.
  • Tool learning enables LLMs to address tasks they cannot complete independently, thereby enhancing their potential across different tasks.
  • However, two key challenges exist: redundant error correction leading to unstable planning and long execution times, and designing a correct plan among multiple tools.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like language. These models have become incredibly skilled at solving complex problems, often by breaking them down into smaller steps or "tools" that they can execute.

The process of teaching LLMs to use these tools is called "tool learning." Imagine you're trying to plan a trip - you might need to use different tools like booking flights, reserving a hotel, and creating an itinerary. By providing the LLM with examples of how to use these tools and what they do, the model can learn to formulate a plan and carry it out.

This approach allows LLMs to take on tasks that they couldn't do on their own, expanding their capabilities. However, there are a couple of challenges. First, the LLM might keep trying to fix errors in its plan, leading to inefficient and unstable planning. Second, figuring out the right sequence of tools to use for a task can be tricky.

To address these issues, the researchers propose a new system called Tool-Planner. The key idea is to group related tools into "toolkits" based on their functions. This allows the LLM to plan across the different toolkits, making it easier to adjust the plan if one tool doesn't work as expected.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed Tool-Planner, a task-processing framework that groups tools based on their API functions and allows LLMs to plan across these toolkits.

When a tool error occurs, the language model can reselect and adjust tools based on the toolkit, rather than trying to fix the error directly. This helps address the issue of redundant error correction and unstable planning.

The researchers conducted experiments to evaluate the performance of their approach across different datasets and compared it to LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude 3. Their results show that Tool-Planner demonstrates a high pass and win rate, optimizing the planning scheme for tool learning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the challenges of tool learning in LLMs. By organizing tools into toolkits, the Tool-Planner system helps to improve the stability and efficiency of the planning process.

However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the limitations of the approach. For example, it's unclear how the system would perform on more complex tasks that require a larger and more diverse set of tools. Additionally, the paper doesn't address the potential for bias or error propagation within the toolkit-based planning process.

Further research is needed to explore the scalability and robustness of the Tool-Planner approach, as well as its applicability to a broader range of tool learning scenarios. It would also be interesting to see how this system compares to other approaches, such as planning-aware techniques or travel planning applications.

Conclusion

The Tool-Planner framework represents a significant step forward in addressing the challenges of tool learning in large language models. By organizing tools into toolkits and allowing LLMs to plan across them, the system helps to improve the stability and efficiency of the planning process.

While the paper demonstrates promising results, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and potential of this approach. As LLMs continue to advance, tool learning will likely play an increasingly important role in unlocking the full potential of these powerful AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Tool-Planner: Dynamic Solution Tree Planning for Large Language Model with Tool Clustering

Yanming Liu, Xinyue Peng, Yuwei Zhang, Jiannan Cao, Xuhong Zhang, Sheng Cheng, Xun Wang, Jianwei Yin, Tianyu Du

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional reasoning capabilities, enabling them to solve various complex problems. Recently, this ability has been applied to the paradigm of tool learning. Tool learning involves providing examples of tool usage and their corresponding functions, allowing LLMs to formulate plans and demonstrate the process of invoking and executing each tool. LLMs can address tasks that they cannot complete independently, thereby enhancing their potential across different tasks. However, this approach faces two key challenges. First, redundant error correction leads to unstable planning and long execution time. Additionally, designing a correct plan among multiple tools is also a challenge in tool learning. To address these issues, we propose Tool-Planner, a task-processing framework based on toolkits. Tool-Planner groups tools based on the API functions with the same function into a toolkit and allows LLMs to implement planning across the various toolkits. When a tool error occurs, the language model can reselect and adjust tools based on the toolkit. Experiments show that our approach demonstrates a high pass and win rate across different datasets and optimizes the planning scheme for tool learning in models such as GPT-4 and Claude 3, showcasing the potential of our method.

Read more

6/7/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Tree-Planner: Efficient Close-loop Task Planning with Large Language Models

Mengkang Hu, Yao Mu, Xinmiao Yu, Mingyu Ding, Shiguang Wu, Wenqi Shao, Qiguang Chen, Bin Wang, Yu Qiao, Ping Luo

This paper studies close-loop task planning, which refers to the process of generating a sequence of skills (a plan) to accomplish a specific goal while adapting the plan based on real-time observations. Recently, prompting Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate actions iteratively has become a prevalent paradigm due to its superior performance and user-friendliness. However, this paradigm is plagued by two inefficiencies: high token consumption and redundant error correction, both of which hinder its scalability for large-scale testing and applications. To address these issues, we propose Tree-Planner, which reframes task planning with LLMs into three distinct phases: plan sampling, action tree construction, and grounded deciding. Tree-Planner starts by using an LLM to sample a set of potential plans before execution, followed by the aggregation of them to form an action tree. Finally, the LLM performs a top-down decision-making process on the tree, taking into account real-time environmental information. Experiments show that Tree-Planner achieves state-of-the-art performance while maintaining high efficiency. By decomposing LLM queries into a single plan-sampling call and multiple grounded-deciding calls, a considerable part of the prompt are less likely to be repeatedly consumed. As a result, token consumption is reduced by 92.2% compared to the previously best-performing model. Additionally, by enabling backtracking on the action tree as needed, the correction process becomes more flexible, leading to a 40.5% decrease in error corrections.

Read more

7/25/2024

Advancing Tool-Augmented Large Language Models: Integrating Insights from Errors in Inference Trees
Total Score

0

Advancing Tool-Augmented Large Language Models: Integrating Insights from Errors in Inference Trees

Sijia Chen, Yibo Wang, Yi-Feng Wu, Qing-Guo Chen, Zhao Xu, Weihua Luo, Kaifu Zhang, Lijun Zhang

Tool-augmented large language models (LLMs) leverage tools, often in the form of APIs, to enhance their reasoning capabilities on complex tasks, thus taking on the role of intelligent agents interacting with the real world. The recently introduced ToolLLaMA model by Qin et al. [2024] utilizes the depth-first search-based decision tree (DFSDT) method for reasoning with $16000+$ real-world APIs, which effectively improves the planning and inferencing performance of tool-augmented LLMs compared to traditional chain reasoning approaches. However, their approach only employs successful paths from decision trees (also called inference trees) for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) during training, which does not fully exploit the advantages of the tree of thought. In this study, we propose an inference trajectory optimization framework based on the preference data extracted from decision trees to address this limitation. We first introduce a novel method for constructing preference data from the tree of thought, capitalizing on the failed explorations previously overlooked in the trees. Specifically, we generate an effective step-wise preference dataset, named ToolPreference, for tool use based on the ToolBench dataset. In the subsequent training phase, we first fine-tune the LLM with tool-usage expert trajectories and then use these step-wise preference pairs for direct preference optimization (DPO) to update the policy of the LLM, resulting in our ToolPrefer-LLaMA (TP-LLaMA) model. Our experiments demonstrate that by obtaining insights from errors in inference trees, TP-LLaMA significantly outperforms the baselines across almost all test scenarios by a large margin and exhibits better generalization capabilities with unseen APIs. At the same time, TP-LLaMA has also demonstrated superior reasoning efficiency compared to the baselines, making it more suitable for complex tool-usage reasoning tasks.

Read more

6/12/2024

Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models

Bernd Bohnet, Azade Nova, Aaron T Parisi, Kevin Swersky, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai, Dale Schuurmans, Noah Fiedel, Hanie Sedghi

We seek to elevate the planning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)investigating four main directions. First, we construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning domains and natural language scenarios. This suite includes algorithms to generate instances with varying levels of difficulty, allowing for rigorous and systematic evaluation of LLM performance. Second, we investigate the use of in-context learning (ICL) to enhance LLM planning, exploring the direct relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance. Third, we demonstrate the positive impact of fine-tuning LLMs on optimal planning paths, as well as the effectiveness of incorporating model-driven search procedures. Finally, we investigate the performance of the proposed methods in out-of-distribution scenarios, assessing the ability to generalize to novel and unseen planning challenges.

Read more

6/21/2024