Towards Explainable Test Case Prioritisation with Learning-to-Rank Models

Overview

• Test case prioritization (TCP) is a crucial task in regression testing to ensure software quality as it evolves.
• Machine learning, particularly learning-to-rank (LTR) algorithms, provide an effective way to order and prioritize test cases.
• However, the use of LTR algorithms poses a challenge in terms of explainability, both at the global model level and for specific results.
• This paper explores scenarios that require different types of explanations and how the unique characteristics of TCP (e.g., multiple builds over time, test case and test suite variations) can influence those explanations.
• The paper includes a preliminary experiment analyzing the similarity of explanations, showing they can vary depending on both test case-specific predictions and relative rankings.

Plain English Explanation

As software is updated and improved over time, it's important to thoroughly test it to maintain quality. Test case prioritization (TCP) is a key part of this process, where the most important test cases are run first.

Machine learning, particularly learning-to-rank (LTR) algorithms, have become a common way to prioritize test cases effectively. These algorithms can order and prioritize the test cases based on their importance.

However, a challenge with using LTR algorithms is that they can be difficult to understand, both in terms of how the overall model works and why specific test cases are prioritized. This explainability issue is important because stakeholders often want to understand the reasoning behind the prioritization.

This paper explores different scenarios where explanations might be needed, and how the unique aspects of TCP (like changes over multiple software builds) could impact the type of explanation required. It also includes an early experiment looking at how the explanations can vary based on the specific test case predictions and their relative rankings.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines the challenge of providing explanations for the use of learning-to-rank (LTR) algorithms in the context of test case prioritization (TCP). TCP is a critical task in regression testing to ensure software quality as it evolves over multiple builds.

LTR algorithms offer an effective way to order and prioritize test cases, but their use poses a challenge in terms of explainability. The paper explores different scenarios that may require varying types of explanations, both at the global model level and for specific test case prioritization results.

The authors consider how the unique characteristics of TCP, such as the presence of multiple software builds over time and changes to test cases and test suites, could influence the type of explanations needed. They include a preliminary experiment that analyzes the similarity of explanations, demonstrating that the explanations can differ depending on both the specific test case predictions and their relative rankings.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important points about the need for explainable machine learning models, particularly in the context of test case prioritization. As the authors note, stakeholders often want to understand the reasoning behind the prioritization of test cases, which can be difficult to provide with black-box LTR algorithms.

The exploration of different scenarios that may require varying types of explanations is a valuable contribution. By considering the unique aspects of TCP, such as changes over multiple software builds, the authors highlight the importance of tailoring explanations to the specific use case.

The preliminary experiment on the similarity of explanations is an interesting first step, but more research would be needed to fully understand the factors that influence the variability of explanations. Additional studies could explore the impact of different LTR algorithms, feature sets, and evaluation metrics on the explainability of TCP results.

One potential limitation of the research is the lack of input from end-users or stakeholders on their specific needs and preferences for explanations. Incorporating user feedback could help refine the understanding of what types of explanations are most useful and meaningful in the context of TCP.

Overall, the paper highlights an important challenge in the application of machine learning to software engineering tasks and provides a thoughtful starting point for further research in this area.

Conclusion

This paper examines the challenge of providing explanations for the use of learning-to-rank (LTR) algorithms in the context of test case prioritization (TCP), a critical task in regression testing. The authors explore different scenarios that may require varying types of explanations, both at the global model level and for specific test case prioritization results.

By considering the unique characteristics of TCP, such as changes over multiple software builds and variations in test cases and test suites, the paper underscores the importance of tailoring explanations to the specific use case. The preliminary experiment on the similarity of explanations demonstrates that the explanations can differ depending on both the test case-specific predictions and their relative rankings.

The research highlights the need for more explainable machine learning models, particularly in software engineering applications where stakeholders often require transparency in decision-making processes. Further studies could explore the impact of different algorithms, feature sets, and user preferences on the explainability of TCP results, ultimately contributing to the development of more accountable and trustworthy machine learning systems.