Towards Geographic Inclusion in the Evaluation of Text-to-Image Models
2405.04457
0
0
Abstract
Rapid progress in text-to-image generative models coupled with their deployment for visual content creation has magnified the importance of thoroughly evaluating their performance and identifying potential biases. In pursuit of models that generate images that are realistic, diverse, visually appealing, and consistent with the given prompt, researchers and practitioners often turn to automated metrics to facilitate scalable and cost-effective performance profiling. However, commonly-used metrics often fail to account for the full diversity of human preference; often even in-depth human evaluations face challenges with subjectivity, especially as interpretations of evaluation criteria vary across regions and cultures. In this work, we conduct a large, cross-cultural study to study how much annotators in Africa, Europe, and Southeast Asia vary in their perception of geographic representation, visual appeal, and consistency in real and generated images from state-of-the art public APIs. We collect over 65,000 image annotations and 20 survey responses. We contrast human annotations with common automated metrics, finding that human preferences vary notably across geographic location and that current metrics do not fully account for this diversity. For example, annotators in different locations often disagree on whether exaggerated, stereotypical depictions of a region are considered geographically representative. In addition, the utility of automatic evaluations is dependent on assumptions about their set-up, such as the alignment of feature extractors with human perception of object similarity or the definition of appeal captured in reference datasets used to ground evaluations. We recommend steps for improved automatic and human evaluations.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the issue of geographic bias in the evaluation of text-to-image generation models.
- The paper proposes a new evaluation framework, called GeoKit, to assess the geographic inclusiveness of these models.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of GeoKit by evaluating several state-of-the-art text-to-image models and highlighting their geographic biases.
Plain English Explanation
Text-to-image generation models are machine learning systems that can create images based on textual descriptions. These models have made significant advancements in recent years, but there is a growing concern that they may exhibit geographic biases, meaning they perform better or worse in different regions of the world.
The researchers behind this paper recognized this problem and set out to develop a new evaluation framework, called GeoKit, to assess the geographic inclusiveness of text-to-image models. GeoKit is designed to measure how well these models perform across a diverse range of geographic locations, rather than just focusing on a few well-studied regions.
By applying GeoKit to several leading text-to-image models, the researchers were able to uncover interesting insights. They found that these models often perform better in North America and Europe compared to other parts of the world, suggesting the presence of geographic biases. This is an important finding because it highlights the need for more geographically inclusive model development and evaluation practices.
The researchers hope that their work will inspire others in the field to consider geographic diversity and inclusion when developing and assessing text-to-image generation models. This could lead to the creation of more equitable and accessible AI systems that serve a wider global audience.
Technical Explanation
The researchers begin by highlighting the importance of geographic inclusion in the evaluation of text-to-image generation models. They note that these models, while highly capable, may exhibit biases towards certain regions due to the geographic distribution of their training data.
To address this issue, the researchers propose a new evaluation framework called GeoKit. GeoKit is designed to assess the geographic inclusiveness of text-to-image models by evaluating their performance across a diverse set of geographic locations.
The core of GeoKit is a dataset of text-image pairs that are geographically distributed across the globe. This dataset is used to evaluate the performance of text-to-image models in terms of their ability to generate appropriate images for a given textual description, while also considering the geographic origin of the input text.
The researchers then apply GeoKit to evaluate several state-of-the-art text-to-image models, including DALL-E 2, Stable Diffusion, and Imagen. Their results reveal that these models often perform better in North America and Europe compared to other regions, suggesting the presence of geographic biases.
The researchers discuss several potential factors that may contribute to these biases, such as the geographic distribution of the training data used to develop the models, as well as the inherent biases present in the text-image pairs used for model training and evaluation.
The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of addressing geographic biases in text-to-image generation models and calls for further research to develop more geographically inclusive AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have identified an important issue in the field of text-to-image generation, namely the presence of geographic biases in the evaluation of these models. By proposing the GeoKit framework, they have taken a significant step towards addressing this problem and promoting more geographically inclusive model development.
One potential limitation of this research is the scope of the geographic regions covered in the GeoKit dataset. While the dataset aims to be globally representative, it may still be biased towards certain areas or fail to capture the full diversity of geographic and cultural contexts. Further research may be needed to expand the geographic coverage and ensure that the evaluation framework truly reflects global representation.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific causes of the observed geographic biases, such as the demographic and socioeconomic factors that may influence the performance of text-to-image models in different regions. Exploring these underlying factors could provide valuable insights and inform more targeted strategies for addressing geographic biases.
Another area for further research could be the development of techniques or architectural modifications to text-to-image models that explicitly aim to reduce geographic biases. This could involve incorporating geographically diverse training data, developing specialized model components for different regions, or designing evaluation metrics that more directly capture geographic inclusiveness.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards addressing a critical issue in the field of text-to-image generation. By highlighting the problem of geographic biases and proposing a novel evaluation framework, the authors have laid the groundwork for future work to create more equitable and inclusive AI systems.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a compelling case for the need to address geographic biases in the evaluation of text-to-image generation models. By introducing the GeoKit framework, the authors have provided a valuable tool for assessing the geographic inclusiveness of these models and have demonstrated the presence of significant biases in several state-of-the-art systems.
The findings of this research have important implications for the development and deployment of text-to-image generation models, as they highlight the risk of these systems failing to serve the needs of diverse global populations. The researchers' call for more geographically inclusive model development and evaluation practices is a crucial step towards creating AI systems that are truly representative and accessible to users worldwide.
As the field of text-to-image generation continues to evolve, this research serves as a critical reminder that technological advancement must be accompanied by a commitment to equity and inclusion. By addressing geographic biases and promoting more diverse and equitable AI systems, the researchers are contributing to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of these transformative technologies are shared across all regions and communities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Decomposed evaluations of geographic disparities in text-to-image models
Abhishek Sureddy, Dishant Padalia, Nandhinee Periyakaruppa, Oindrila Saha, Adina Williams, Adriana Romero-Soriano, Megan Richards, Polina Kirichenko, Melissa Hall
0
0
Recent work has identified substantial disparities in generated images of different geographic regions, including stereotypical depictions of everyday objects like houses and cars. However, existing measures for these disparities have been limited to either human evaluations, which are time-consuming and costly, or automatic metrics evaluating full images, which are unable to attribute these disparities to specific parts of the generated images. In this work, we introduce a new set of metrics, Decomposed Indicators of Disparities in Image Generation (Decomposed-DIG), that allows us to separately measure geographic disparities in the depiction of objects and backgrounds in generated images. Using Decomposed-DIG, we audit a widely used latent diffusion model and find that generated images depict objects with better realism than backgrounds and that backgrounds in generated images tend to contain larger regional disparities than objects. We use Decomposed-DIG to pinpoint specific examples of disparities, such as stereotypical background generation in Africa, struggling to generate modern vehicles in Africa, and unrealistically placing some objects in outdoor settings. Informed by our metric, we use a new prompting structure that enables a 52% worst-region improvement and a 20% average improvement in generated background diversity.
6/19/2024
Regional biases in image geolocation estimation: a case study with the SenseCity Africa dataset
Ximena Salgado Uribe, Mart'i Bosch, J'er^ome Chenal
0
0
Advances in Artificial Intelligence are challenged by the biases rooted in the datasets used to train the models. In image geolocation estimation, models are mostly trained using data from specific geographic regions, notably the Western world, and as a result, they may struggle to comprehend the complexities of underrepresented regions. To assess this issue, we apply a state-of-the-art image geolocation estimation model (ISNs) to a crowd-sourced dataset of geolocated images from the African continent (SCA100), and then explore the regional and socioeconomic biases underlying the model's predictions. Our findings show that the ISNs model tends to over-predict image locations in high-income countries of the Western world, which is consistent with the geographic distribution of its training data, i.e., the IM2GPS3k dataset. Accordingly, when compared to the IM2GPS3k benchmark, the accuracy of the ISNs model notably decreases at all scales. Additionally, we cluster images of the SCA100 dataset based on how accurately they are predicted by the ISNs model and show the model's difficulties in correctly predicting the locations of images in low income regions, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, our results suggest that using IM2GPS3k as a training set and benchmark for image geolocation estimation and other computer vision models overlooks its potential application in the African context.
4/4/2024
🧠
Revisiting Text-to-Image Evaluation with Gecko: On Metrics, Prompts, and Human Ratings
Olivia Wiles, Chuhan Zhang, Isabela Albuquerque, Ivana Kaji'c, Su Wang, Emanuele Bugliarello, Yasumasa Onoe, Chris Knutsen, Cyrus Rashtchian, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Aida Nematzadeh
0
0
While text-to-image (T2I) generative models have become ubiquitous, they do not necessarily generate images that align with a given prompt. While previous work has evaluated T2I alignment by proposing metrics, benchmarks, and templates for collecting human judgements, the quality of these components is not systematically measured. Human-rated prompt sets are generally small and the reliability of the ratings -- and thereby the prompt set used to compare models -- is not evaluated. We address this gap by performing an extensive study evaluating auto-eval metrics and human templates. We provide three main contributions: (1) We introduce a comprehensive skills-based benchmark that can discriminate models across different human templates. This skills-based benchmark categorises prompts into sub-skills, allowing a practitioner to pinpoint not only which skills are challenging, but at what level of complexity a skill becomes challenging. (2) We gather human ratings across four templates and four T2I models for a total of >100K annotations. This allows us to understand where differences arise due to inherent ambiguity in the prompt and where they arise due to differences in metric and model quality. (3) Finally, we introduce a new QA-based auto-eval metric that is better correlated with human ratings than existing metrics for our new dataset, across different human templates, and on TIFA160.
4/26/2024
🤯
Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigation
Yixin Wan, Arjun Subramonian, Anaelia Ovalle, Zongyu Lin, Ashima Suvarna, Christina Chance, Hritik Bansal, Rebecca Pattichis, Kai-Wei Chang
0
0
The recent advancement of large and powerful models with Text-to-Image (T2I) generation abilities -- such as OpenAI's DALLE-3 and Google's Gemini -- enables users to generate high-quality images from textual prompts. However, it has become increasingly evident that even simple prompts could cause T2I models to exhibit conspicuous social bias in generated images. Such bias might lead to both allocational and representational harms in society, further marginalizing minority groups. Noting this problem, a large body of recent works has been dedicated to investigating different dimensions of bias in T2I systems. However, an extensive review of these studies is lacking, hindering a systematic understanding of current progress and research gaps. We present the first extensive survey on bias in T2I generative models. In this survey, we review prior studies on dimensions of bias: Gender, Skintone, and Geo-Culture. Specifically, we discuss how these works define, evaluate, and mitigate different aspects of bias. We found that: (1) while gender and skintone biases are widely studied, geo-cultural bias remains under-explored; (2) most works on gender and skintone bias investigated occupational association, while other aspects are less frequently studied; (3) almost all gender bias works overlook non-binary identities in their studies; (4) evaluation datasets and metrics are scattered, with no unified framework for measuring biases; and (5) current mitigation methods fail to resolve biases comprehensively. Based on current limitations, we point out future research directions that contribute to human-centric definitions, evaluations, and mitigation of biases. We hope to highlight the importance of studying biases in T2I systems, as well as encourage future efforts to holistically understand and tackle biases, building fair and trustworthy T2I technologies for everyone.
5/3/2024