Conformal online model aggregation
2403.15527
0
0
Abstract
Conformal prediction equips machine learning models with a reasonable notion of uncertainty quantification without making strong distributional assumptions. It wraps around any black-box prediction model and converts point predictions into set predictions that have a predefined marginal coverage guarantee. However, conformal prediction only works if we fix the underlying machine learning model in advance. A relatively unaddressed issue in conformal prediction is that of model selection and/or aggregation: for a given problem, which of the plethora of prediction methods (random forests, neural nets, regularized linear models, etc.) should we conformalize? This paper proposes a new approach towards conformal model aggregation in online settings that is based on combining the prediction sets from several algorithms by voting, where weights on the models are adapted over time based on past performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new method called "Conformal Online Model Aggregation" for combining multiple machine learning models in an online setting.
- The proposed approach allows for the efficient integration of new models as they become available, while maintaining robust and calibrated predictions.
- The method is shown to outperform existing techniques for online model aggregation in terms of predictive performance and computational efficiency.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to combine multiple machine learning models to make predictions, particularly in situations where new models are constantly being added. The key idea is to use a technique called "conformal prediction" to ensure that the combined predictions are well-calibrated and reliable, even as new models are incorporated.
Imagine you have a group of experts, each with their own unique perspective, and you need to combine their opinions to make a final decision. The paper on self-consistent conformal prediction shows how you can do this in a way that maintains the strengths of each expert while also accounting for their biases.
Similarly, in the online setting, new machine learning models are constantly being developed and released. The paper on conformal prediction with learned features demonstrates how you can efficiently incorporate these new models into your decision-making process, without having to start from scratch each time.
The authors' approach, "Conformal Online Model Aggregation," leverages the principles of conformal prediction to ensure that the combined predictions remain well-calibrated and reliable, even as the set of available models changes over time. This is particularly important in applications where accurate and trustworthy predictions are critical, such as medical diagnosis or financial forecasting.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new method called "Conformal Online Model Aggregation" for combining multiple machine learning models in an online setting. The key idea is to use a technique called "conformal prediction" to ensure that the combined predictions are well-calibrated and reliable, even as new models are incorporated.
The authors first formalize the problem of online model aggregation, where a set of base models are available, and new models can be added over time. They then propose a conformal prediction-based approach to address this problem, which involves two main components:
-
Model Aggregation: The authors develop a method to efficiently aggregate the predictions of the available models, using a weighted average approach. The weights are determined based on the historical performance of each model, as well as the conformal predictions they produce.
-
Conformal Prediction: The authors leverage the principles of conformal prediction to ensure that the combined predictions remain well-calibrated and reliable, even as the set of available models changes over time. This is achieved by computing prediction intervals for each new input, which provide a measure of the uncertainty in the predictions.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through extensive experiments on a range of datasets, comparing it to several existing online model aggregation methods. The results show that the proposed "Conformal Online Model Aggregation" method outperforms the baselines in terms of predictive performance and computational efficiency.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to the problem of online model aggregation, with a strong theoretical foundation and robust experimental validation. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be considered:
-
Sensitivity to model quality: The performance of the proposed method may be sensitive to the quality of the base models being aggregated. If the available models are poorly performing or biased, the conformal prediction-based aggregation may not be able to overcome these issues.
-
Computational complexity: While the authors claim the method is computationally efficient, the need to compute conformal prediction intervals for each new input may still be a limiting factor, especially for large-scale applications.
-
Interpretability: The weighted averaging approach used for model aggregation may not be the most interpretable or explainable mechanism, particularly in cases where the underlying models have vastly different architectures or training processes.
-
Real-world deployment: The paper focuses on controlled experimental settings, and it would be valuable to see how the proposed method performs in real-world, dynamic environments where model updates and data drift are more common.
Overall, the "Conformal Online Model Aggregation" approach presented in this paper is a promising contribution to the field of online learning and model combination. By leveraging the principles of conformal prediction, the authors have developed a robust and efficient method that could have significant practical applications in various domains.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new method called "Conformal Online Model Aggregation" for combining multiple machine learning models in an online setting. The key innovation is the use of conformal prediction to ensure that the combined predictions remain well-calibrated and reliable, even as new models are incorporated over time.
The proposed approach has several advantages over existing online model aggregation techniques, including improved predictive performance and computational efficiency. By maintaining robust and trustworthy predictions, the method could have important applications in fields where accurate and reliable decision-making is critical, such as healthcare, finance, and safety-critical systems.
While the paper presents a strong theoretical foundation and robust experimental results, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be explored. Overall, the "Conformal Online Model Aggregation" method represents an exciting development in the field of online learning and model combination, with the potential to significantly impact real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction
Lars van der Laan, Ahmed M. Alaa
0
0
In decision-making guided by machine learning, decision-makers may take identical actions in contexts with identical predicted outcomes. Conformal prediction helps decision-makers quantify uncertainty in point predictions of outcomes, allowing for better risk management for actions. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce textit{Self-Consistent Conformal Prediction} for regression, which combines two post-hoc approaches -- Venn-Abers calibration and conformal prediction -- to provide calibrated point predictions and compatible prediction intervals that are valid conditional on model predictions. Our procedure can be applied post-hoc to any black-box model to provide predictions and inferences with finite-sample prediction-conditional guarantees. Numerical experiments show our approach strikes a balance between interval efficiency and conditional validity.
4/23/2024
Conformal Validity Guarantees Exist for Any Data Distribution
Drew Prinster, Samuel Stanton, Anqi Liu, Suchi Saria
0
0
As artificial intelligence (AI) / machine learning (ML) gain widespread adoption, practitioners are increasingly seeking means to quantify and control the risk these systems incur. This challenge is especially salient when such systems have autonomy to collect their own data, such as in black-box optimization and active learning, where their actions induce sequential feedback-loop shifts in the data distribution. Conformal prediction is a promising approach to uncertainty and risk quantification, but prior variants' validity guarantees have assumed some form of ``quasi-exchangeability'' on the data distribution, thereby excluding many types of sequential shifts. In this paper we prove that conformal prediction can theoretically be extended to textit{any} joint data distribution, not just exchangeable or quasi-exchangeable ones. Although the most general case is exceedingly impractical to compute, for concrete practical applications we outline a procedure for deriving specific conformal algorithms for any data distribution, and we use this procedure to derive tractable algorithms for a series of AI/ML-agent-induced covariate shifts. We evaluate the proposed algorithms empirically on synthetic black-box optimization and active learning tasks.
6/6/2024
Conformal Language Modeling
Victor Quach, Adam Fisch, Tal Schuster, Adam Yala, Jae Ho Sohn, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Regina Barzilay
0
0
We propose a novel approach to conformal prediction for generative language models (LMs). Standard conformal prediction produces prediction sets -- in place of single predictions -- that have rigorous, statistical performance guarantees. LM responses are typically sampled from the model's predicted distribution over the large, combinatorial output space of natural language. Translating this process to conformal prediction, we calibrate a stopping rule for sampling different outputs from the LM that get added to a growing set of candidates until we are confident that the output set is sufficient. Since some samples may be low-quality, we also simultaneously calibrate and apply a rejection rule for removing candidates from the output set to reduce noise. Similar to conformal prediction, we prove that the sampled set returned by our procedure contains at least one acceptable answer with high probability, while still being empirically precise (i.e., small) on average. Furthermore, within this set of candidate responses, we show that we can also accurately identify subsets of individual components -- such as phrases or sentences -- that are each independently correct (e.g., that are not hallucinations), again with statistical guarantees. We demonstrate the promise of our approach on multiple tasks in open-domain question answering, text summarization, and radiology report generation using different LM variants.
6/4/2024
Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods
John J. Cherian, Isaac Gibbs, Emmanuel J. Cand`es
0
0
We develop new conformal inference methods for obtaining validity guarantees on the output of large language models (LLMs). Prior work in conformal language modeling identifies a subset of the text that satisfies a high-probability guarantee of correctness. These methods work by filtering claims from the LLM's original response if a scoring function evaluated on the claim fails to exceed a threshold calibrated via split conformal prediction. Existing methods in this area suffer from two deficiencies. First, the guarantee stated is not conditionally valid. The trustworthiness of the filtering step may vary based on the topic of the response. Second, because the scoring function is imperfect, the filtering step can remove many valuable and accurate claims. We address both of these challenges via two new conformal methods. First, we generalize the conditional conformal procedure of Gibbs et al. (2023) in order to adaptively issue weaker guarantees when they are required to preserve the utility of the output. Second, we show how to systematically improve the quality of the scoring function via a novel algorithm for differentiating through the conditional conformal procedure. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
6/17/2024