Towards Massive Multilingual Holistic Bias
0
🖼️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper addresses the need to understand, evaluate, and mitigate demographic biases in automatic language generation models as they become increasingly multilingual.
- The researchers present the MASSIVE MULTILINGUAL HOLISTICBIAS (MMHB) dataset and benchmark, which consists of approximately 6 million sentences representing 13 demographic axes across 8 initial languages.
- The paper proposes an automatic construction methodology to scale up the MMHB dataset in terms of both language coverage and size, leveraging limited human annotation.
- The researchers use this dataset to analyze gender bias and added toxicity in machine translation tasks.
Plain English Explanation
As language models become more advanced and multilingual, it's important to understand and address any demographic biases they may have. The MASSIVE MULTILINGUAL HOLISTICBIAS (MMHB) dataset aims to help with this by providing a large, diverse dataset of sentences representing different demographic characteristics.
The researchers developed a clever way to automatically generate more sentences for the dataset, reducing the need for manual translation. They used placeholders in the sentence structure and systematically translated the different parts (like nouns and descriptors) separately.
The researchers then used this dataset to look at how well language models handle gender bias and toxicity in machine translation. They found that the models tend to perform better on sentences with masculine language, and that the translations can sometimes become more toxic.
Overall, this research is an important step in understanding and addressing demographic biases in language models as they become more widely used.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the initial MASSIVE MULTILINGUAL HOLISTICBIAS (MMHB) dataset, which consists of approximately 6 million sentences across 8 languages representing 13 demographic axes. To scale up the dataset, the researchers developed an automatic construction methodology that leverages limited human annotation.
This approach uses placeholders in the sentence structure and systematically translates the different components (nouns, descriptors, etc.) independently. Combined with human translation, this technique generates multiple sentence variations while significantly reducing the manual workload.
The researchers used the MMHB dataset to analyze gender bias and added toxicity in machine translation tasks. They found that the models lack gender robustness, performing significantly better on sentences with masculine language compared to feminine. The models also tended to overgeneralize to masculine forms, scoring higher on masculine references.
Additionally, the MMHB dataset was able to trigger added toxicity of up to 2.3% in the machine translation outputs.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive methodology for constructing a large-scale, multilingual dataset to measure demographic biases in language models. The automated approach for expanding the dataset is particularly innovative, as it reduces the burden of manual translation while maintaining linguistic diversity.
However, the paper does not delve into the potential limitations of the dataset or the analysis. For example, it would be valuable to understand the quality and consistency of the automatically generated sentences, as well as the representativeness of the 13 demographic axes included.
Additionally, the paper could have provided more detailed insights into the specific nature of the gender biases and toxicity observed in the machine translation outputs. Understanding the underlying mechanisms and patterns behind these biases could lead to more targeted mitigation strategies.
Further research could also explore the performance of the MMHB dataset on a wider range of language models and tasks, as well as investigate the potential intersectionality of different demographic factors.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant contribution to the field of automatic language generation by introducing the MASSIVE MULTILINGUAL HOLISTICBIAS (MMHB) dataset and an innovative methodology for its expansion. The analysis of gender bias and toxicity in machine translation highlights the importance of addressing demographic biases in multilingual language models.
As these models continue to advance and become more widely deployed, the MMHB dataset and the research insights provided in this paper will be invaluable for the development of fair and inclusive natural language processing systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🖼️
0
Towards Massive Multilingual Holistic Bias
Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Prangthip Hansanti, Carleigh Wood, Bokai Yu, Christophe Ropers, Marta R. Costa-juss`a
In the current landscape of automatic language generation, there is a need to understand, evaluate, and mitigate demographic biases as existing models are becoming increasingly multilingual. To address this, we present the initial eight languages from the MASSIVE MULTILINGUAL HOLISTICBIAS (MMHB) dataset and benchmark consisting of approximately 6 million sentences representing 13 demographic axes. We propose an automatic construction methodology to further scale up MMHB sentences in terms of both language coverage and size, leveraging limited human annotation. Our approach utilizes placeholders in multilingual sentence construction and employs a systematic method to independently translate sentence patterns, nouns, and descriptors. Combined with human translation, this technique carefully designs placeholders to dynamically generate multiple sentence variations and significantly reduces the human translation workload. The translation process has been meticulously conducted to avoid an English-centric perspective and include all necessary morphological variations for languages that require them, improving from the original English HOLISTICBIAS. Finally, we utilize MMHB to report results on gender bias and added toxicity in machine translation tasks. On the gender analysis, MMHB unveils: (1) a lack of gender robustness showing almost +4 chrf points in average for masculine semantic sentences compared to feminine ones and (2) a preference to overgeneralize to masculine forms by reporting more than +12 chrf points in average when evaluating with masculine compared to feminine references. MMHB triggers added toxicity up to 2.3%.
Read more7/2/2024
0
Leveraging Large Language Models to Measure Gender Bias in Gendered Languages
Erik Derner, Sara Sansalvador de la Fuente, Yoan Guti'errez, Paloma Moreda, Nuria Oliver
Gender bias in text corpora used in various natural language processing (NLP) contexts, such as for training large language models (LLMs), can lead to the perpetuation and amplification of societal inequalities. This is particularly pronounced in gendered languages like Spanish or French, where grammatical structures inherently encode gender, making the bias analysis more challenging. Existing methods designed for English are inadequate for this task due to the intrinsic linguistic differences between English and gendered languages. This paper introduces a novel methodology that leverages the contextual understanding capabilities of LLMs to quantitatively analyze gender representation in Spanish corpora. By utilizing LLMs to identify and classify gendered nouns and pronouns in relation to their reference to human entities, our approach provides a nuanced analysis of gender biases. We empirically validate our method on four widely-used benchmark datasets, uncovering significant gender disparities with a male-to-female ratio ranging from 4:1 to 6:1. These findings demonstrate the value of our methodology for bias quantification in gendered languages and suggest its application in NLP, contributing to the development of more equitable language technologies.
Read more6/21/2024
💬
0
Do Multilingual Large Language Models Mitigate Stereotype Bias?
Shangrui Nie, Michael Fromm, Charles Welch, Rebekka Gorge, Akbar Karimi, Joan Plepi, Nazia Afsan Mowmita, Nicolas Flores-Herr, Mehdi Ali, Lucie Flek
While preliminary findings indicate that multilingual LLMs exhibit reduced bias compared to monolingual ones, a comprehensive understanding of the effect of multilingual training on bias mitigation, is lacking. This study addresses this gap by systematically training six LLMs of identical size (2.6B parameters) and architecture: five monolingual models (English, German, French, Italian, and Spanish) and one multilingual model trained on an equal distribution of data across these languages, all using publicly available data. To ensure robust evaluation, standard bias benchmarks were automatically translated into the five target languages and verified for both translation quality and bias preservation by human annotators. Our results consistently demonstrate that multilingual training effectively mitigates bias. Moreover, we observe that multilingual models achieve not only lower bias but also superior prediction accuracy when compared to monolingual models with the same amount of training data, model architecture, and size.
Read more7/10/2024
🧠
0
An Empirical Study on the Robustness of Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation
Supryadi, Leiyu Pan, Deyi Xiong
Massively multilingual neural machine translation (MMNMT) has been proven to enhance the translation quality of low-resource languages. In this paper, we empirically investigate the translation robustness of Indonesian-Chinese translation in the face of various naturally occurring noise. To assess this, we create a robustness evaluation benchmark dataset for Indonesian-Chinese translation. This dataset is automatically translated into Chinese using four NLLB-200 models of different sizes. We conduct both automatic and human evaluations. Our in-depth analysis reveal the correlations between translation error types and the types of noise present, how these correlations change across different model sizes, and the relationships between automatic evaluation indicators and human evaluation indicators. The dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/tjunlp-lab/ID-ZH-MTRobustEval.
Read more5/14/2024