Towards Optimizing and Evaluating a Retrieval Augmented QA Chatbot using LLMs with Human in the Loop
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores ways to optimize and evaluate a retrieval-augmented question-answering (QA) chatbot that uses large language models (LLMs) and incorporates human feedback.
- The researchers investigate techniques to improve the chatbot's performance and explore methods for automatically evaluating the chatbot's conversational abilities.
- The paper presents the development of a corpus of human-chatbot dialogues that can be used to benchmark chatbot performance.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper are working on creating a more advanced chatbot that can engage in question-and-answer conversations. The key ideas are:
-
Retrieval-Augmented QA Chatbot: The chatbot uses large language models (LLMs) to understand and respond to user questions, but it also retrieves relevant information from a database to supplement its responses. This helps the chatbot provide more accurate and informative answers.
-
Human-in-the-Loop: The researchers involve humans in the process of improving the chatbot. Humans provide feedback on the chatbot's responses, and this feedback is used to fine-tune and optimize the chatbot's performance over time.
-
Corpus Development: The researchers have created a dataset of conversations between humans and the chatbot. This dataset can be used to evaluate the chatbot's conversational abilities and benchmark its performance against other chatbots.
The goal is to create a more capable and helpful chatbot that can engage in natural, informative dialogues with users. By incorporating human feedback and evaluation, the researchers aim to continuously improve the chatbot's performance and make it a more effective tool for information retrieval and question-answering.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for developing and evaluating a retrieval-augmented QA chatbot that uses LLMs. The key components are:
-
Retrieval-Augmented QA: The chatbot combines a language model with an information retrieval system. The language model is used to understand user queries and generate responses, while the retrieval system provides relevant background information to enhance the responses.
-
Human-in-the-Loop: The researchers incorporate human feedback into the chatbot's training and optimization process. Humans evaluate the chatbot's responses, and this feedback is used to fine-tune the language model and retrieval components.
-
Corpus Development: The researchers create a dataset of human-chatbot dialogues, which can be used to evaluate the chatbot's conversational abilities. This dataset includes a variety of query types, user feedback, and the chatbot's responses.
The paper describes experiments to optimize the chatbot's performance and explore different methods for automatically evaluating its conversational abilities. The researchers also discuss the potential benefits and limitations of their approach, as well as areas for future research.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to developing and evaluating a more capable and responsive QA chatbot. The integration of human feedback and the creation of a benchmark dataset are valuable contributions to the field of conversational AI.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and challenges:
- Scalability: It's unclear how well the human-in-the-loop approach would scale to large-scale chatbot deployments, where obtaining continuous human feedback could be logistically challenging.
- Bias and Fairness: The paper does not discuss how the chatbot's responses might be affected by biases in the training data or the human feedback, and how these issues could be addressed.
- Ethical Considerations: The paper does not explore the ethical implications of deploying a chatbot that may be perceived as engaging in human-like interactions, and the potential for user confusion or misunderstanding.
Further research is needed to address these and other potential concerns, as well as to explore the long-term viability and impact of this approach to chatbot development and evaluation.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for optimizing and evaluating a retrieval-augmented QA chatbot using LLMs and human-in-the-loop techniques. The key contributions are the development of a corpus of human-chatbot dialogues for benchmarking chatbot performance and the integration of human feedback to continuously improve the chatbot's conversational abilities.
While the paper demonstrates the potential of this approach, it also highlights the need for further research to address scalability, bias, and ethical considerations. By continuing to explore these areas, the researchers can help advance the field of conversational AI and create more capable and trustworthy chatbots that can better serve the needs of users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards Optimizing and Evaluating a Retrieval Augmented QA Chatbot using LLMs with Human in the Loop
Anum Afzal, Alexander Kowsik, Rajna Fani, Florian Matthes
Large Language Models have found application in various mundane and repetitive tasks including Human Resource (HR) support. We worked with the domain experts of SAP SE to develop an HR support chatbot as an efficient and effective tool for addressing employee inquiries. We inserted a human-in-the-loop in various parts of the development cycles such as dataset collection, prompt optimization, and evaluation of generated output. By enhancing the LLM-driven chatbot's response quality and exploring alternative retrieval methods, we have created an efficient, scalable, and flexible tool for HR professionals to address employee inquiries effectively. Our experiments and evaluation conclude that GPT-4 outperforms other models and can overcome inconsistencies in data through internal reasoning capabilities. Additionally, through expert analysis, we infer that reference-free evaluation metrics such as G-Eval and Prometheus demonstrate reliability closely aligned with that of human evaluation.
Read more7/9/2024
💬
0
From Text to Insight: Leveraging Large Language Models for Performance Evaluation in Management
Ning Li, Huaikang Zhou, Mingze Xu
This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, to enhance objectivity in organizational task performance evaluations. Through comparative analyses across two studies, including various task performance outputs, we demonstrate that LLMs can serve as a reliable and even superior alternative to human raters in evaluating knowledge-based performance outputs, which are a key contribution of knowledge workers. Our results suggest that GPT ratings are comparable to human ratings but exhibit higher consistency and reliability. Additionally, combined multiple GPT ratings on the same performance output show strong correlations with aggregated human performance ratings, akin to the consensus principle observed in performance evaluation literature. However, we also find that LLMs are prone to contextual biases, such as the halo effect, mirroring human evaluative biases. Our research suggests that while LLMs are capable of extracting meaningful constructs from text-based data, their scope is currently limited to specific forms of performance evaluation. By highlighting both the potential and limitations of LLMs, our study contributes to the discourse on AI role in management studies and sets a foundation for future research to refine AI theoretical and practical applications in management.
Read more8/13/2024
💬
0
Towards Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Medical Q&A Evaluation
Jack Krolik, Herprit Mahal, Feroz Ahmad, Gaurav Trivedi, Bahador Saket
This paper explores the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the evaluation of responses in medical Question and Answer (Q&A) systems, a crucial form of Natural Language Processing. Traditionally, human evaluation has been indispensable for assessing the quality of these responses. However, manual evaluation by medical professionals is time-consuming and costly. Our study examines whether LLMs can reliably replicate human evaluations by using questions derived from patient data, thereby saving valuable time for medical experts. While the findings suggest promising results, further research is needed to address more specific or complex questions that were beyond the scope of this initial investigation.
Read more9/4/2024
0
HumanRankEval: Automatic Evaluation of LMs as Conversational Assistants
Milan Gritta, Gerasimos Lampouras, Ignacio Iacobacci
Language models (LMs) as conversational assistants recently became popular tools that help people accomplish a variety of tasks. These typically result from adapting LMs pretrained on general domain text sequences through further instruction-tuning and possibly preference optimisation methods. The evaluation of such LMs would ideally be performed using human judgement, however, this is not scalable. On the other hand, automatic evaluation featuring auxiliary LMs as judges and/or knowledge-based tasks is scalable but struggles with assessing conversational ability and adherence to instructions. To help accelerate the development of LMs as conversational assistants, we propose a novel automatic evaluation task: HumanRankEval (HRE). It consists of a large-scale, diverse and high-quality set of questions, each with several answers authored and scored by humans. To perform evaluation, HRE ranks these answers based on their log-likelihood under the LM's distribution, and subsequently calculates their correlation with the corresponding human rankings. We support HRE's efficacy by investigating how efficiently it separates pretrained and instruction-tuned LMs of various sizes. We show that HRE correlates well with human judgements and is particularly responsive to model changes following instruction-tuning.
Read more5/16/2024