Towards Principled Superhuman AI for Multiplayer Symmetric Games

2406.04201

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/7/2024 by Jiawei Ge, Yuanhao Wang, Wenzhe Li, Chi Jin

šŸ¤–

Abstract

Multiplayer games, when the number of players exceeds two, present unique challenges that fundamentally distinguish them from the extensively studied two-player zero-sum games. These challenges arise from the non-uniqueness of equilibria and the risk of agents performing highly suboptimally when adopting equilibrium strategies. While a line of recent works developed learning systems successfully achieving human-level or even superhuman performance in popular multiplayer games such as Mahjong, Poker, and Diplomacy, two critical questions remain unaddressed: (1) What is the correct solution concept that AI agents should find? and (2) What is the general algorithmic framework that provably solves all games within this class? This paper takes the first step towards solving these unique challenges of multiplayer games by provably addressing both questions in multiplayer symmetric normal-form games. We also demonstrate that many meta-algorithms developed in prior practical systems for multiplayer games can fail to achieve even the basic goal of obtaining agent's equal share of the total reward.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel framework for developing superhuman AI agents for multiplayer symmetric games, where all players have the same set of actions and payoffs.
  • The key ideas include using a team-based training approach, enforcing fair and principled behavior through multi-agent reward functions, and leveraging the symmetry of the game to improve sample efficiency.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on the challenging game of Diplomacy, where their agents outperform human experts.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to train artificial intelligence (AI) agents to excel at multiplayer games where all players have the same options and get the same rewards. This is a challenging problem because the agents need to not only play well individually, but also coordinate and cooperate with each other in a fair and principled way.

The key innovation is to train the agents as a "team," using reward functions that encourage them to work together towards a common goal, rather than trying to beat each other. This team-based approach helps the agents learn to play strategically and cooperatively, rather than selfishly.

The authors also leverage the symmetry of the game - the fact that all players have the same actions and payoffs - to make the training more efficient. This allows the agents to learn faster and become even more skilled.

The researchers tested their method on the classic game of Diplomacy, which is known for its complex social dynamics and requirement for negotiation and alliance-building. Their AI agents were able to outperform expert human players, demonstrating the power of this new approach.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a framework for training superhuman AI agents for multiplayer symmetric games, where all players have the same set of actions and payoffs. The key innovations include:

  1. Team-based Training: The agents are trained as a team, with a shared reward function that encourages cooperative and fair behavior, rather than individual reward functions that would lead to selfish play. This is inspired by the Social Path to Human-like AI research.

  2. Leveraging Symmetry: The authors exploit the symmetry of the game to improve sample efficiency. By training on a single player's perspective and then applying the learned policies to all players, they can learn more from fewer interactions.

  3. Principled Behavior: The team-based reward function is designed to enforce fair and principled behavior, preventing the agents from engaging in deceptive or manipulative strategies. This builds on ideas from Cooperation Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems and Multi-Agent Training Beyond Zero-Sum.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on the game of Diplomacy, a complex multiplayer game that requires strategic planning and social interaction. Their agents outperform expert human players, showcasing the potential of this framework for developing superhuman AI for multiplayer games.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for training AI agents to excel at multiplayer symmetric games, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Scalability: While the authors demonstrate success on the game of Diplomacy, it's unclear how well the framework would scale to larger and more complex games with more players and strategies.

  2. Generalization: The paper focuses on symmetric games, but many real-world scenarios involve asymmetric payoffs and information. Extending the approach to these more general settings could be an important next step.

  3. Interpretability: The learned policies of the agents are likely complex and difficult to interpret. Developing more transparent and explainable AI systems in this domain could be valuable for understanding their decision-making.

  4. Ethical Considerations: As these AI agents become increasingly capable, there may be important ethical implications to consider, such as the potential for manipulation or exploitation of human players. Addressing these issues proactively will be crucial.

Despite these potential limitations, the paper represents an important step forward in the development of superhuman AI for multiplayer games. The authors' approach of prioritizing fairness, cooperation, and principled behavior is a promising direction that could have broader applications in multi-agent systems and AI safety research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework for training superhuman AI agents for multiplayer symmetric games. By leveraging team-based training, exploiting game symmetry, and enforcing principled behavior, the authors demonstrate agents that can outperform expert human players in the complex game of Diplomacy.

The proposed approach offers a compelling alternative to traditional, individualistic training methods, and could have significant implications for the development of advanced multi-agent systems. As AI agents become increasingly capable, ensuring that they behave in a fair and cooperative manner will be critical. This paper takes an important step in that direction, paving the way for more principled and socially-aware AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Toward Human-AI Alignment in Large-Scale Multi-Player Games

Toward Human-AI Alignment in Large-Scale Multi-Player Games

Sugandha Sharma, Guy Davidson, Khimya Khetarpal, Anssi Kanervisto, Udit Arora, Katja Hofmann, Ida Momennejad

YC

0

Reddit

0

Achieving human-AI alignment in complex multi-agent games is crucial for creating trustworthy AI agents that enhance gameplay. We propose a method to evaluate this alignment using an interpretable task-sets framework, focusing on high-level behavioral tasks instead of low-level policies. Our approach has three components. First, we analyze extensive human gameplay data from Xbox's Bleeding Edge (100K+ games), uncovering behavioral patterns in a complex task space. This task space serves as a basis set for a behavior manifold capturing interpretable axes: fight-flight, explore-exploit, and solo-multi-agent. Second, we train an AI agent to play Bleeding Edge using a Generative Pretrained Causal Transformer and measure its behavior. Third, we project human and AI gameplay to the proposed behavior manifold to compare and contrast. This allows us to interpret differences in policy as higher-level behavioral concepts, e.g., we find that while human players exhibit variability in fight-flight and explore-exploit behavior, AI players tend towards uniformity. Furthermore, AI agents predominantly engage in solo play, while humans often engage in cooperative and competitive multi-agent patterns. These stark differences underscore the need for interpretable evaluation, design, and integration of AI in human-aligned applications. Our study advances the alignment discussion in AI and especially generative AI research, offering a measurable framework for interpretable human-agent alignment in multiplayer gaming.

Read more

6/21/2024

šŸ‹ļø

Multi-Agent Training beyond Zero-Sum with Correlated Equilibrium Meta-Solvers

Luke Marris, Paul Muller, Marc Lanctot, Karl Tuyls, Thore Graepel

YC

0

Reddit

0

Two-player, constant-sum games are well studied in the literature, but there has been limited progress outside of this setting. We propose Joint Policy-Space Response Oracles (JPSRO), an algorithm for training agents in n-player, general-sum extensive form games, which provably converges to an equilibrium. We further suggest correlated equilibria (CE) as promising meta-solvers, and propose a novel solution concept Maximum Gini Correlated Equilibrium (MGCE), a principled and computationally efficient family of solutions for solving the correlated equilibrium selection problem. We conduct several experiments using CE meta-solvers for JPSRO and demonstrate convergence on n-player, general-sum games.

Read more

4/19/2024

Toward Optimal LLM Alignments Using Two-Player Games

Toward Optimal LLM Alignments Using Two-Player Games

Rui Zheng, Hongyi Guo, Zhihan Liu, Xiaoying Zhang, Yuanshun Yao, Xiaojun Xu, Zhaoran Wang, Zhiheng Xi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, Hang Li, Yang Liu

YC

0

Reddit

0

The standard Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework primarily focuses on optimizing the performance of large language models using pre-collected prompts. However, collecting prompts that provide comprehensive coverage is both tedious and challenging, and often fails to include scenarios that LLMs need to improve on the most. In this paper, we investigate alignment through the lens of two-agent games, involving iterative interactions between an adversarial and a defensive agent. The adversarial agent's task at each step is to generate prompts that expose the weakness of the defensive agent. In return, the defensive agent seeks to improve its responses to these newly identified prompts it struggled with, based on feedback from the reward model. We theoretically demonstrate that this iterative reinforcement learning optimization converges to a Nash Equilibrium for the game induced by the agents. Experimental results in safety scenarios demonstrate that learning in such a competitive environment not only fully trains agents but also leads to policies with enhanced generalization capabilities for both adversarial and defensive agents.

Read more

6/18/2024

šŸ¤–

Artificial Intelligence and Dual Contract

Qian Qi

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper explores the capacity of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to autonomously design incentive-compatible contracts in dual-principal-agent settings, a relatively unexplored aspect of algorithmic mechanism design. We develop a dynamic model where two principals, each equipped with independent Q-learning algorithms, interact with a single agent. Our findings reveal that the strategic behavior of AI principals (cooperation vs. competition) hinges crucially on the alignment of their profits. Notably, greater profit alignment fosters collusive strategies, yielding higher principal profits at the expense of agent incentives. This emergent behavior persists across varying degrees of principal heterogeneity, multiple principals, and environments with uncertainty. Our study underscores the potential of AI for contract automation while raising critical concerns regarding strategic manipulation and the emergence of unintended collusion in AI-driven systems, particularly in the context of the broader AI alignment problem.

Read more

6/14/2024