Towards robust radiomics and radiogenomics predictive models for brain tumor characterization

Read original: arXiv:2406.03583 - Published 6/12/2024 by Maria Nadeem, Asma Shaheen, Muhammad F. A. Chaudhary, Hassan Mohy-ud-Din
Total Score

0

🔗

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examined the stability of radiomics features (measurements extracted from medical images) to variations in automated brain tumor segmentation methods, and the impact on predicting IDH gene mutation and overall survival for brain cancer patients.
  • Focused on resource-constrained clinical settings in developing countries, using efficient deep learning models that can run with limited computational power.
  • Found that texture features, especially from the whole tumor region, were the most stable, while shape features and features from the enhancing tumor region were less stable.
  • Showed that accounting for feature stability improved the performance and reliability of predictive models for the two clinical tasks.

Plain English Explanation

This research looked at how reliable certain measurements extracted from brain tumor medical images (called radiomics features) are, when the process of automatically outlining the different tumor regions has some variability. The researchers wanted to understand if this variability in the automated tumor segmentation would impact the ability to use the radiomics features to predict important clinical outcomes, like whether the tumor has a certain gene mutation (IDH) or how long the patient will survive (overall survival).

To make the study relevant for clinics with limited computer resources, like in developing countries, the researchers used efficient deep learning models that don't require a lot of computational power to do the tumor segmentation. They found that texture-based radiomics features, especially those from the entire tumor region, tended to be the most stable to variations in the automated segmentation. Features related to the shape of the tumor and those from the region of active tumor growth were less stable.

Accounting for this feature stability improved the performance and reliability of the predictive models for IDH mutation status and overall survival. This suggests that it's important to carefully consider the stability of radiomics features, especially when using automated segmentation methods, in order to build robust and trustworthy predictive models for brain cancer.

Technical Explanation

The researchers focused on two main questions in the context of brain tumor characterization:

  1. How stable are radiomics features to variations in the automated, multi-regional segmentation of the tumor using deep learning methods?
  2. How does this stability (or lack thereof) impact the performance of predictive models for downstream clinical tasks, specifically IDH gene mutation prediction and overall survival classification?

To address these questions, the team employed several state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that can be trained with limited computational resources, as is often the case in underserved or resource-constrained clinical settings in developing countries. They used these efficient CNN models to perform the automated, multi-regional segmentation of the brain tumors.

The researchers then analyzed the stability of the extracted radiomics features, finding that:

  • Texture features were the most stable (79.1%), especially those from the whole tumor (WT) region (96.1%)
  • Features from the T1Gd (35.9%) and T1 (28%) MRI sequences tended to be more stable
  • Shape features and features from the enhancing (EN) tumor subregion had the lowest stability

Accounting for this feature stability through filtering significantly improved the performance and reliability of the predictive models for IDH mutation status and overall survival classification. This suggests that learning robust radiomics and radiogenomics models with stable discriminatory features is crucial, given the inevitable variability introduced by automated segmentation methods, even efficient ones.

The study also demonstrates the potential value of using suboptimal, but computationally efficient, deep segmentation networks as auxiliary tools to identify stable radiomics features, rather than relying on them directly for clinical outcome prediction.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study. First, they only examined a subset of state-of-the-art CNN models for tumor segmentation, and it's possible that more advanced or specialized models could provide even more stable segmentations. Additionally, the study was constrained to a single dataset, so the generalizability of the findings to other brain tumor datasets is unclear.

Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the potential reasons why certain radiomics features, like texture, tend to be more stable to segmentation variations. Exploring the underlying biological or image characteristics that contribute to this stability could provide deeper insights.

While the focus on resource-constrained clinical settings is commendable, the paper does not address other practical challenges that may arise in deploying such radiomics-based predictive models in these environments, such as the availability of appropriate imaging hardware and expertise, data privacy and security concerns, and integration with existing clinical workflows.

Additional research is needed to further validate the importance of radiomics feature stability and explore more sophisticated techniques for explaining and interpreting the predictions of these models, especially in resource-constrained settings.

Conclusion

This study highlights the critical importance of considering the stability of radiomics features when developing predictive models for brain cancer, particularly in the context of automated tumor segmentation. The researchers demonstrated that accounting for feature stability can significantly improve the performance and reliability of models for clinically relevant tasks, such as predicting IDH gene mutation status and overall survival.

By focusing on efficient deep learning models that can operate within the limited computational resources often found in underserved or developing regions, the study provides insights that could help improve brain cancer diagnosis and prognosis in these settings. The findings also suggest that suboptimal but efficient segmentation networks can be leveraged as auxiliary tools to identify stable radiomics features, rather than relying on them directly for clinical predictions.

Overall, this research underscores the need for careful consideration of the stability and robustness of radiomics features when building trustworthy and clinically applicable predictive models for brain tumors and other medical applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔗

Total Score

0

Towards robust radiomics and radiogenomics predictive models for brain tumor characterization

Maria Nadeem, Asma Shaheen, Muhammad F. A. Chaudhary, Hassan Mohy-ud-Din

In the context of brain tumor characterization, we focused on two key questions: (a) stability of radiomics features to variability in multiregional segmentation masks obtained with fully-automatic deep segmentation methods and (b) subsequent impact on predictive performance on downstream tasks: IDH prediction and Overall Survival (OS) classification. We further constrained our study to limited computational resources setting which are found in underprivileged, remote, and (or) resource-starved clinical sites in developing countries. We employed seven SOTA CNNs which can be trained with limited computational resources and have demonstrated superior segmentation performance on BraTS challenge. Subsequent selection of discriminatory features was done with RFE-SVM and MRMR. Our study revealed that highly stable radiomics features were: (1) predominantly texture features (79.1%), (2) mainly extracted from WT region (96.1%), and (3) largely representing T1Gd (35.9%) and T1 (28%) sequences. Shape features and radiomics features extracted from the ENC subregion had the lowest average stability. Stability filtering minimized non-physiological variability in predictive models as indicated by an order-of-magnitude decrease in the relative standard deviation of AUCs. The non-physiological variability is attributed to variability in multiregional segmentation maps obtained with fully-automatic CNNs. Stability filtering significantly improved predictive performance on the two downstream tasks substantiating the inevitability of learning novel radiomics and radiogenomics models with stable discriminatory features. The study (implicitly) demonstrates the importance of suboptimal deep segmentation networks which can be exploited as auxiliary networks for subsequent identification of radiomics features stable to variability in automatically generated multiregional segmentation maps.

Read more

6/12/2024

Unraveling Radiomics Complexity: Strategies for Optimal Simplicity in Predictive Modeling
Total Score

0

Unraveling Radiomics Complexity: Strategies for Optimal Simplicity in Predictive Modeling

Mahdi Ait Lhaj Loutfi, Teodora Boblea Podasca, Alex Zwanenburg, Taman Upadhaya, Jorge Barrios, David R. Raleigh, William C. Chen, Dante P. I. Capaldi, Hong Zheng, Olivier Gevaert, Jing Wu, Alvin C. Silva, Paul J. Zhang, Harrison X. Bai, Jan Seuntjens, Steffen Lock, Patrick O. Richard, Olivier Morin, Caroline Reinhold, Martin Lepage, Martin Valli`eres

Background: The high dimensionality of radiomic feature sets, the variability in radiomic feature types and potentially high computational requirements all underscore the need for an effective method to identify the smallest set of predictive features for a given clinical problem. Purpose: Develop a methodology and tools to identify and explain the smallest set of predictive radiomic features. Materials and Methods: 89,714 radiomic features were extracted from five cancer datasets: low-grade glioma, meningioma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and two renal cell carcinoma cohorts (n=2104). Features were categorized by computational complexity into morphological, intensity, texture, linear filters, and nonlinear filters. Models were trained and evaluated on each complexity level using the area under the curve (AUC). The most informative features were identified, and their importance was explained. The optimal complexity level and associated most informative features were identified using systematic statistical significance analyses and a false discovery avoidance procedure, respectively. Their predictive importance was explained using a novel tree-based method. Results: MEDimage, a new open-source tool, was developed to facilitate radiomic studies. Morphological features were optimal for MRI-based meningioma (AUC: 0.65) and low-grade glioma (AUC: 0.68). Intensity features were optimal for CECT-based renal cell carcinoma (AUC: 0.82) and CT-based NSCLC (AUC: 0.76). Texture features were optimal for MRI-based renal cell carcinoma (AUC: 0.72). Tuning the Hounsfield unit range improved results for CECT-based renal cell carcinoma (AUC: 0.86). Conclusion: Our proposed methodology and software can estimate the optimal radiomics complexity level for specific medical outcomes, potentially simplifying the use of radiomics in predictive modeling across various contexts.

Read more

7/9/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Analysis of clinical, dosimetric and radiomic features for predicting local failure after stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases in malignant melanoma

Nanna E. Hartong, Ilias Sachpazidis, Oliver Blanck, Lucas Etzel, Jan C. Peeken, Stephanie E. Combs, Horst Urbach, Maxim Zaitsev, Dimos Baltas, Ilinca Popp, Anca-Ligia Grosu, Tobias Fechter

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of clinical, dosimetric and pretherapeutic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features for lesion-specific outcome prediction of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma (MBM). Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective analysis, we reviewed 517 MBM from 130 patients treated with SRT (single fraction or hypofractionated). For each gross tumor volume (GTV) 1576 radiomic features (RF) were calculated (788 each for the GTV and for a 3 mm margin around the GTV). Clinical parameters, radiation dose and RF from pretherapeutic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI from different institutions were evaluated with a feature processing and elimination pipeline in a nested cross-validation scheme. Results: Seventy-two (72) of 517 lesions (13.9%) showed a local failure (LF) after SRT. The processing pipeline showed clinical, dosimetric and radiomic features providing information for LF prediction. The most prominent ones were the correlation of the gray level co-occurrence matrix of the margin (hazard ratio (HR): 0.37, confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.58) and systemic therapy before SRT (HR: 0.55, CI: 0.42-0.70). The majority of RF associated with LF was calculated in the margin around the GTV. Conclusions: Pretherapeutic MRI based RF connected with lesion-specific outcome after SRT could be identified, despite multicentric data and minor differences in imaging protocols. Image data analysis of the surrounding metastatic environment may provide therapy-relevant information with the potential to further individualize radiotherapy strategies.

Read more

6/3/2024

BrainMetDetect: Predicting Primary Tumor from Brain Metastasis MRI Data Using Radiomic Features and Machine Learning Algorithms
Total Score

0

BrainMetDetect: Predicting Primary Tumor from Brain Metastasis MRI Data Using Radiomic Features and Machine Learning Algorithms

Hamidreza Sadeghsalehi

Objective: Brain metastases (BMs) are common in cancer patients and determining the primary tumor site is crucial for effective treatment. This study aims to predict the primary tumor site from BM MRI data using radiomic features and advanced machine learning algorithms. Methods: We utilized a comprehensive dataset from Ocana-Tienda et al. (2023) comprising MRI and clinical data from 75 patients with BMs. Radiomic features were extracted from post-contrast T1-weighted MRI sequences. Feature selection was performed using the GINI index, and data normalization was applied to ensure consistent scaling. We developed and evaluated Random Forest and XGBoost classifiers, both with and without hyperparameter optimization using the FOX (Fox optimizer) algorithm. Model interpretability was enhanced using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values. Results: The baseline Random Forest model achieved an accuracy of 0.85, which improved to 0.93 with FOX optimization. The XGBoost model showed an initial accuracy of 0.96, increasing to 0.99 after optimization. SHAP analysis revealed the most influential radiomic features contributing to the models' predictions. The FOX-optimized XGBoost model exhibited the best performance with a precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.99. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of using radiomic features and machine learning to predict primary tumor sites from BM MRI data. The FOX optimization algorithm significantly enhanced model performance, and SHAP provided valuable insights into feature importance. These findings highlight the potential of integrating radiomics and machine learning into clinical practice for improved diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment planning.

Read more

7/9/2024