Towards the Socio-Algorithmic Construction of Fairness: The Case of Automatic Price-Surging in Ride-Hailing

Overview

• Algorithms are making decisions that impact people's lives, but can perpetuate biases and discrimination.
• There is a lack of understanding of how algorithms impact social construction processes, and vice versa.
• The paper analyzes the public discourse around algorithms' decisions following a price surge after a significant event.

Plain English Explanation

Algorithms are computer programs that make decisions, and these decisions can have a big impact on people's lives. However, research has shown that algorithms can sometimes reflect and even amplify biases and discrimination that exist in society.

The paper looks at how these algorithmic decisions are interpreted and discussed by the public. After a significant event in New York City (the Brooklyn Subway Shooting), there was a lot of controversy around the pricing decisions made by ride-hailing companies' algorithms. People debated what was "fair" and whether the algorithms' choices were justified.

The researchers found that even when algorithms are not directly mentioned, they strongly influence how people think about fairness and other ethical issues. The algorithms set the terms of the debate, shape people's expectations, and become a way for people to promote their moral views.

At the same time, the researchers argue that these notions of fairness are no longer just social - they are now a combination of social and algorithmic processes. The paper proposes a new theory of "socio-algorithmic construction" to explain how our ideas about fairness and ethics are formed through this interaction between humans and algorithms.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the public discourse that emerged after a significant price surge in ride-hailing services following the Brooklyn Subway Shooting on April 12, 2022. The researchers examined online discussions to understand how algorithms, even when not explicitly mentioned, impact the construction of fairness assessments and notions.

The analysis reveals that algorithms initiate the exchange, form people's expectations, evoke solidarity with specific groups, and serve as a vehicle for moral crusading. However, the algorithms are also subject to adjustments based on social forces. The researchers claim this process of constructing fairness is no longer just social, but has become a "socio-algorithmic" process.

The paper proposes a theory of "socio-algorithmic construction" as a mechanism for establishing notions of fairness and other ethical constructs. This theory suggests that algorithms, while not always visible, play a crucial role in shaping social perceptions and moral frameworks.

The researchers analyzed online discussions using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, including topic modeling and sentiment analysis. They found that the discourse evolved around various notions of fairness and the justifiability of the algorithms' decisions.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between algorithms and social construction processes. It highlights the need for a deeper understanding of how algorithmic decision-making impacts societal notions of fairness and ethics.

One potential limitation of the research is the focus on a specific event (the Brooklyn Subway Shooting) and its impact on ride-hailing pricing. While this provides a relevant case study, the findings may not be fully generalizable to other algorithmic domains or contexts.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the technical details of the algorithms used by the ride-hailing companies. A more in-depth analysis of the algorithmic design, inputs, and decision-making processes could offer additional insights into the socio-algorithmic construction process.

Further research could also explore the role of transparency and accountability in algorithmic decision-making, as well as the potential for algorithmic fairness and long-term fairness mechanisms to mitigate the impact of biases and discrimination.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the critical need to understand the complex relationship between algorithms and social construction processes. It proposes a new theory of "socio-algorithmic construction" to explain how our notions of fairness and ethics are shaped by the interplay between algorithms and human discourse.

The findings underscore the importance of considering the societal implications of algorithmic decision-making and the need for a more holistic approach to evaluating algorithmic fairness. As algorithms become more pervasive in our lives, this research provides a valuable framework for addressing the ethical challenges and ensuring algorithmic decisions align with societal values.