Towards a theory of how the structure of language is acquired by deep neural networks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a theory on how deep neural networks acquire the structure of language.
- The authors explore the mechanisms by which neural networks can learn the hierarchical organization of language without being explicitly trained on syntactic structure.
- The paper aims to provide insights into the general principles underlying the acquisition of language structure by artificial intelligence systems.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper are trying to understand how deep neural networks, a type of AI system, are able to learn the structure of language. Natural human languages like English have a complex hierarchical organization, with words combining into phrases, phrases into clauses, and clauses into sentences. This research explores how neural networks can figure out this structure without being explicitly taught the rules of grammar.
The key idea is that neural networks can discover the structure of language by identifying patterns and statistical regularities in the language data they are exposed to during training. Over time, the network learns to recognize the building blocks of language and how they fit together, even without being given a formal set of grammatical rules. This process is similar to how children acquire language - they learn by exposure and experience, not by being taught explicit rules.
By understanding this process of language acquisition in neural networks, the researchers hope to gain insights into the general principles that govern how artificial intelligence systems can learn complex hierarchical structures. This could have important implications for developing more capable and versatile language-based AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a theoretical framework for understanding how deep neural networks can learn the hierarchical structure of language from data alone, without being explicitly trained on syntactic structure.
The key idea is that neural networks can discover the structure of language by identifying statistical regularities and patterns in the language data they are exposed to during training. Over time, the network learns to recognize the building blocks of language, such as words, phrases, and clauses, and how they fit together into a hierarchical structure.
The authors draw analogies to the way children acquire language, where they learn through exposure and experience rather than being taught explicit grammatical rules. Similarly, the neural network can learn the structure of language by detecting statistical regularities and developing internal representations that capture the underlying hierarchical organization.
The paper also explores how the fractal-like properties of language may play a role in enabling neural networks to discover its hierarchical structure. The authors suggest that the self-similar patterns observed in natural language data may provide useful inductive biases that facilitate the network's ability to learn the structure.
Overall, the theoretical framework presented in the paper aims to provide insights into the general principles underlying the acquisition of language structure by artificial intelligence systems. This could have important implications for developing more capable and versatile language-based AI models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling theoretical framework for understanding how deep neural networks can learn the hierarchical structure of language without being explicitly trained on syntax. The authors' analogy to child language acquisition is particularly helpful in making the core ideas more accessible.
However, the paper does not provide empirical evidence to directly support the proposed theory. While the authors draw connections to related research, such as the work on fractal patterns in language, more concrete validation of the key mechanisms would strengthen the paper's claims.
Additionally, the paper does not fully address the limitations and potential issues with the proposed theory. For example, it does not discuss how the theory might apply to more complex or ambiguous linguistic structures, or how it might scale to larger and more diverse language datasets.
Further research and experimentation would be needed to fully validate the theoretical framework and explore its practical implications for the development of advanced language-based AI systems. The authors' work provides a valuable foundation for deeper mathematical and empirical investigations into the cognitive and computational principles underlying language acquisition in artificial intelligence.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising theoretical framework for understanding how deep neural networks can learn the hierarchical structure of language without being explicitly trained on syntax. By drawing analogies to child language acquisition and the fractal-like properties of language, the authors offer insights into the general principles that may govern the discovery of linguistic structure by artificial intelligence systems.
While the paper does not provide direct empirical evidence, its conceptual contribution lays the groundwork for further research and experimentation in this area. Developing a deeper understanding of how neural networks can acquire language structure could have significant implications for the advancement of more capable and versatile language-based AI models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards a theory of how the structure of language is acquired by deep neural networks
Francesco Cagnetta, Matthieu Wyart
How much data is required to learn the structure of a language via next-token prediction? We study this question for synthetic datasets generated via a Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar (PCFG) -- a tree-like generative model that captures many of the hierarchical structures found in natural languages. We determine token-token correlations analytically in our model and show that they can be used to build a representation of the grammar's hidden variables, the longer the range the deeper the variable. In addition, a finite training set limits the resolution of correlations to an effective range, whose size grows with that of the training set. As a result, a Language Model trained with increasingly many examples can build a deeper representation of the grammar's structure, thus reaching good performance despite the high dimensionality of the problem. We conjecture that the relationship between training set size and effective range of correlations holds beyond our synthetic datasets. In particular, our conjecture predicts how the scaling law for the test loss behaviour with training set size depends on the length of the context window, which we confirm empirically in Shakespeare's plays and Wikipedia articles.
Read more9/4/2024
💬
0
Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structures
Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li
Transformer-based language models are effective but complex, and understanding their inner workings is a significant challenge. Previous research has primarily explored how these models handle simple tasks like name copying or selection, and we extend this by investigating how these models grasp complex, recursive language structures defined by context-free grammars (CFGs). We introduce a family of synthetic CFGs that produce hierarchical rules, capable of generating lengthy sentences (e.g., hundreds of tokens) that are locally ambiguous and require dynamic programming to parse. Despite this complexity, we demonstrate that generative models like GPT can accurately learn this CFG language and generate sentences based on it. We explore the model's internals, revealing that its hidden states precisely capture the structure of CFGs, and its attention patterns resemble the information passing in a dynamic programming algorithm. This paper also presents several corollaries, including showing why positional embedding is inferior to relative attention or rotary embedding; demonstrating that encoder-based models (e.g., BERT, deBERTa) cannot learn very deeply nested CFGs as effectively as generative models (e.g., GPT); and highlighting the necessity of adding structural and syntactic errors to the pretraining data to make the model more robust to corrupted language prefixes.
Read more6/4/2024
🔎
65
Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors are Universal Learners
Eran Malach
Large language models display remarkable capabilities in logical and mathematical reasoning, allowing them to solve complex tasks. Interestingly, these abilities emerge in networks trained on the simple task of next-token prediction. In this work, we present a theoretical framework for studying auto-regressive next-token predictors. We demonstrate that even simple models such as linear next-token predictors, trained on Chain-of-Thought (CoT) data, can approximate any function efficiently computed by a Turing machine. We introduce a new complexity measure -- length complexity -- which measures the number of intermediate tokens in a CoT sequence required to approximate some target function, and analyze the interplay between length complexity and other notions of complexity. Finally, we show experimentally that simple next-token predictors, such as linear networks and shallow Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs), display non-trivial performance on text generation and arithmetic tasks. Our results demonstrate that the power of today's LLMs can be attributed, to a great extent, to the auto-regressive next-token training scheme, and not necessarily to a particular choice of architecture.
Read more7/31/2024
💬
0
Characterizing Learning Curves During Language Model Pre-Training: Learning, Forgetting, and Stability
Tyler A. Chang, Zhuowen Tu, Benjamin K. Bergen
How do language models learn to make predictions during pre-training? To study this, we extract learning curves from five autoregressive English language model pre-training runs, for 1M unseen tokens in context. We observe that the language models generate short repetitive phrases before learning to generate longer and more coherent text. We also find that individual tokens often exhibit sudden increases or decreases in loss that are surprisingly consistent across pre-training runs. To better understand these fluctuations, we quantify the final surprisal, within-run variability, age of acquisition, forgettability, and cross-run variability of learning curves for individual tokens in context. More frequent tokens reach lower final surprisals, exhibit less variability within and across pre-training runs, are learned earlier, and are less likely to be forgotten during pre-training. Higher n-gram probabilities further accentuate these effects. Independent of the target token, shorter and more frequent contexts correlate with marginally more stable and quickly acquired predictions. Based on our results, we argue for the existence of sequential learning dependencies between different model capabilities, and we characterize language model learning as early n-gram learning before gradual refinement of tail n-gram predictions.
Read more8/1/2024