Training Compute Thresholds: Features and Functions in AI Governance

Overview

• The paper examines the use of training compute thresholds as a tool for governing artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
• The authors argue that compute thresholds can serve as a valuable trigger for further evaluation of AI models, rather than being the sole determinant of regulation.
• The paper outlines several key advantages of using compute thresholds in AI governance frameworks.

Plain English Explanation

The research paper looks at using the amount of computing power needed to train an AI system as a way to help manage and oversee these advanced technologies. The authors suggest that rather than relying solely on compute thresholds to regulate AI, they can be used as an initial filter to identify models that may be higher-risk and require additional scrutiny.

Some of the key benefits of using compute thresholds that the paper highlights include:

• Correlation with model capabilities and risks - The amount of compute needed to train an AI system can indicate how powerful and potentially risky the model may be.
• Quantifiability and ease of measurement - Compute can be easily measured and compared across different AI systems.
• Robustness to circumvention - It's difficult for AI developers to understate the compute used in training to avoid thresholds.
• Knowability before deployment - Compute thresholds can be determined before an AI model is even built.
• Potential for external verification - Compute usage can be audited by third parties.
• Targeted scope - Thresholds can focus regulation on the most capable and potentially harmful AI systems.

By using compute thresholds alongside other sector-specific regulations and broader governance measures, the authors argue this can provide a practical starting point for identifying and further evaluating high-risk AI models.

Technical Explanation

The paper makes the case that training compute thresholds can serve as a valuable tool within broader AI governance frameworks. The authors note that compute thresholds are correlated with an AI model's capabilities and associated risks, making them a quantifiable and easily measured indicator.

Importantly, compute thresholds are resistant to circumvention, as it is difficult for AI developers to understate the true compute used in training. Additionally, compute requirements can be known before a model is even developed and deployed, enabling proactive regulation. The authors also highlight that compute usage can be externally verified by third parties.

Crucially, the targeted scope of compute thresholds allows regulators to focus their attention on the most capable and potentially harmful AI systems, rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach. The authors propose that compute thresholds should be used as an initial filter, alongside other sector-specific regulations and broader governance measures, to identify models that may require further evaluation.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the use of compute thresholds in AI governance, highlighting several practical advantages over other potential regulatory approaches. However, the authors acknowledge that compute thresholds should not be the sole determinant of regulation, and that they should be used in conjunction with other measures.

One potential limitation is that compute thresholds may not capture all relevant risks associated with AI systems. For example, certain AI models may exhibit undesirable behaviors or biases that are not directly correlated with their training compute. Additionally, the rapidly evolving nature of AI technology may require ongoing reassessment of appropriate compute thresholds over time.

Further research could explore ways to reduce barriers to entry for foundation model training, which could potentially undermine the efficacy of compute thresholds. Ongoing monitoring and adaptation of governance frameworks will be crucial to ensure they remain effective in the face of rapid technological change.

Conclusion

The paper presents a compelling case for the use of training compute thresholds as part of a broader AI governance framework. While compute thresholds alone are not a silver bullet, they offer several practical advantages as an initial filter for identifying potentially high-risk AI systems.

By leveraging compute thresholds alongside other sector-specific regulations and broader governance measures, policymakers and regulators can take a targeted approach to managing the risks associated with advanced AI technologies. As the field of AI continues to evolve rapidly, ongoing evaluation and adaptation of governance frameworks will be essential to ensure they remain effective in protecting the public interest.