Can we Defend Against the Unknown? An Empirical Study About Threshold Selection for Neural Network Monitoring

Read original: arXiv:2405.08654 - Published 5/22/2024 by Khoi Tran Dang, Kevin Delmas, J'er'emie Guiochet, Joris Gu'erin
Total Score

0

Can we Defend Against the Unknown? An Empirical Study About Threshold Selection for Neural Network Monitoring

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This study investigates the problem of threshold selection for neural network monitoring, which is crucial for detecting anomalies or out-of-distribution inputs.
  • The researchers conducted an empirical analysis to understand the challenges and limitations of existing threshold selection methods.
  • The paper provides insights into the factors that influence threshold selection and suggests approaches for improving the robustness of neural network monitoring.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks are powerful machine learning models that can be used for a wide range of tasks, such as image recognition, natural language processing, and anomaly detection. However, these models can sometimes make mistakes or behave unexpectedly, especially when faced with data that is different from what they were trained on.

To address this issue, researchers have developed techniques for monitoring the outputs of neural networks and detecting when they are encountering inputs that are significantly different from their training data. This is known as "out-of-distribution" detection, and it is an important part of ensuring the reliability and safety of neural network-based systems.

One key component of neural network monitoring is the selection of a threshold value that determines when an input should be flagged as out-of-distribution. The researchers in this study explored the challenges involved in choosing the right threshold and conducted experiments to better understand the factors that influence this decision.

Their findings suggest that there are trade-offs involved in threshold selection, and that the optimal threshold can vary depending on the specific characteristics of the neural network and the data it is designed to work with. The researchers also identified potential ways to improve the robustness of neural network monitoring, such as by using ensemble methods or incorporating additional information about the network's internal state.

Overall, this study provides valuable insights into an important problem in the field of machine learning, and it highlights the need for continued research and development in the area of neural network monitoring and anomaly detection.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this study focused on the problem of threshold selection for neural network monitoring, which is a crucial component of detecting anomalies or out-of-distribution inputs. They conducted an empirical analysis to understand the challenges and limitations of existing threshold selection methods.

The researchers first provided a background on neural network monitoring and out-of-distribution detection, highlighting the importance of these techniques for ensuring the reliability and safety of neural network-based systems. They then described a series of experiments designed to explore the factors that influence threshold selection, such as the choice of the underlying neural network architecture, the characteristics of the training and test data, and the specific metric used to evaluate the performance of the monitoring system.

The researchers' experiments revealed several key insights. First, they found that the optimal threshold can vary significantly depending on the specific characteristics of the neural network and the data it is designed to work with. They also observed that the performance of the monitoring system can be sensitive to the choice of threshold, with small changes in the threshold value leading to large changes in the system's behavior.

Additionally, the researchers explored the use of ensemble methods and incorporating additional information about the network's internal state as potential ways to improve the robustness of neural network monitoring. They found that these approaches can help to mitigate some of the challenges associated with threshold selection.

Critical Analysis

The researchers in this study have made a valuable contribution to the field of neural network monitoring by conducting a thorough empirical analysis of the threshold selection problem. Their findings highlight the complex trade-offs involved in choosing the right threshold and underscore the need for further research in this area.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focused on a relatively narrow set of neural network architectures and datasets. It would be interesting to see how the researchers' findings might extend to a broader range of neural network models and application domains, such as real-time anomaly detection using convolutional autoencoders.

Additionally, the study did not explore the potential impact of adversarial attacks on the performance of the neural network monitoring system. This is an important consideration, as adversarial examples can pose a significant challenge for out-of-distribution detection algorithms.

Despite these limitations, the researchers have provided a solid foundation for further exploration of the threshold selection problem, and their findings could have important implications for the development of more robust and reliable neural network-based systems.

Conclusion

This study offers valuable insights into the challenge of threshold selection for neural network monitoring, a critical component of ensuring the reliability and safety of these powerful machine learning models. The researchers' empirical analysis has revealed the complex trade-offs involved in choosing the right threshold and has suggested potential approaches for improving the robustness of neural network monitoring.

As neural networks continue to be deployed in increasingly important and high-stakes applications, the need for robust and reliable monitoring systems will only grow. The findings from this study can help to inform the development of more advanced techniques for detecting anomalies and out-of-distribution inputs, ultimately contributing to the broader goal of building trustworthy and accountable AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Can we Defend Against the Unknown? An Empirical Study About Threshold Selection for Neural Network Monitoring
Total Score

0

Can we Defend Against the Unknown? An Empirical Study About Threshold Selection for Neural Network Monitoring

Khoi Tran Dang, Kevin Delmas, J'er'emie Guiochet, Joris Gu'erin

With the increasing use of neural networks in critical systems, runtime monitoring becomes essential to reject unsafe predictions during inference. Various techniques have emerged to establish rejection scores that maximize the separability between the distributions of safe and unsafe predictions. The efficacy of these approaches is mostly evaluated using threshold-agnostic metrics, such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. However, in real-world applications, an effective monitor also requires identifying a good threshold to transform these scores into meaningful binary decisions. Despite the pivotal importance of threshold optimization, this problem has received little attention. A few studies touch upon this question, but they typically assume that the runtime data distribution mirrors the training distribution, which is a strong assumption as monitors are supposed to safeguard a system against potentially unforeseen threats. In this work, we present rigorous experiments on various image datasets to investigate: 1. The effectiveness of monitors in handling unforeseen threats, which are not available during threshold adjustments. 2. Whether integrating generic threats into the threshold optimization scheme can enhance the robustness of monitors.

Read more

5/22/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Monitizer: Automating Design and Evaluation of Neural Network Monitors

Muqsit Azeem, Marta Grobelna, Sudeep Kanav, Jan Kretinsky, Stefanie Mohr, Sabine Rieder

The behavior of neural networks (NNs) on previously unseen types of data (out-of-distribution or OOD) is typically unpredictable. This can be dangerous if the network's output is used for decision-making in a safety-critical system. Hence, detecting that an input is OOD is crucial for the safe application of the NN. Verification approaches do not scale to practical NNs, making runtime monitoring more appealing for practical use. While various monitors have been suggested recently, their optimization for a given problem, as well as comparison with each other and reproduction of results, remain challenging. We present a tool for users and developers of NN monitors. It allows for (i) application of various types of monitors from the literature to a given input NN, (ii) optimization of the monitor's hyperparameters, and (iii) experimental evaluation and comparison to other approaches. Besides, it facilitates the development of new monitoring approaches. We demonstrate the tool's usability on several use cases of different types of users as well as on a case study comparing different approaches from recent literature.

Read more

5/20/2024

Optimal Classification-based Anomaly Detection with Neural Networks: Theory and Practice
Total Score

0

New!Optimal Classification-based Anomaly Detection with Neural Networks: Theory and Practice

Tian-Yi Zhou, Matthew Lau, Jizhou Chen, Wenke Lee, Xiaoming Huo

Anomaly detection is an important problem in many application areas, such as network security. Many deep learning methods for unsupervised anomaly detection produce good empirical performance but lack theoretical guarantees. By casting anomaly detection into a binary classification problem, we establish non-asymptotic upper bounds and a convergence rate on the excess risk on rectified linear unit (ReLU) neural networks trained on synthetic anomalies. Our convergence rate on the excess risk matches the minimax optimal rate in the literature. Furthermore, we provide lower and upper bounds on the number of synthetic anomalies that can attain this optimality. For practical implementation, we relax some conditions to improve the search for the empirical risk minimizer, which leads to competitive performance to other classification-based methods for anomaly detection. Overall, our work provides the first theoretical guarantees of unsupervised neural network-based anomaly detectors and empirical insights on how to design them well.

Read more

9/16/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Cost-Sensitive Uncertainty-Based Failure Recognition for Object Detection

Moussa Kassem Sbeyti, Michelle Karg, Christian Wirth, Nadja Klein, Sahin Albayrak

Object detectors in real-world applications often fail to detect objects due to varying factors such as weather conditions and noisy input. Therefore, a process that mitigates false detections is crucial for both safety and accuracy. While uncertainty-based thresholding shows promise, previous works demonstrate an imperfect correlation between uncertainty and detection errors. This hinders ideal thresholding, prompting us to further investigate the correlation and associated cost with different types of uncertainty. We therefore propose a cost-sensitive framework for object detection tailored to user-defined budgets on the two types of errors, missing and false detections. We derive minimum thresholding requirements to prevent performance degradation and define metrics to assess the applicability of uncertainty for failure recognition. Furthermore, we automate and optimize the thresholding process to maximize the failure recognition rate w.r.t. the specified budget. Evaluation on three autonomous driving datasets demonstrates that our approach significantly enhances safety, particularly in challenging scenarios. Leveraging localization aleatoric uncertainty and softmax-based entropy only, our method boosts the failure recognition rate by 36-60% compared to conventional approaches. Code is available at https://mos-ks.github.io/publications.

Read more

4/29/2024