Transcendence: Generative Models Can Outperform The Experts That Train Them
2406.11741
4
0
Abstract
Generative models are trained with the simple objective of imitating the conditional probability distribution induced by the data they are trained on. Therefore, when trained on data generated by humans, we may not expect the artificial model to outperform the humans on their original objectives. In this work, we study the phenomenon of transcendence: when a generative model achieves capabilities that surpass the abilities of the experts generating its data. We demonstrate transcendence by training an autoregressive transformer to play chess from game transcripts, and show that the trained model can sometimes achieve better performance than all players in the dataset. We theoretically prove that transcendence can be enabled by low-temperature sampling, and rigorously assess this claim experimentally. Finally, we discuss other sources of transcendence, laying the groundwork for future investigation of this phenomenon in a broader setting.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the concept of "transcendence" in the context of generative models, where the generated outputs can outperform the experts who trained them.
- The paper defines transcendence and provides examples of how it can occur in machine learning systems.
- Experiments are conducted to demonstrate the potential for transcendence and discuss the implications for the future of AI.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers investigate a fascinating phenomenon known as "transcendence" in the field of machine learning. Transcendence occurs when a generative model, such as an AI system that creates images or text, is able to produce outputs that are better or more effective than the experts who originally trained the model.
Imagine a scenario where an AI system is trained to generate images of landscapes. The experts who designed the system may have extensive knowledge of art, photography, and visual composition. However, once the AI is trained, it may start generating landscapes that are even more aesthetically pleasing or realistic than the examples the experts used during the training process. This is an example of transcendence - the model has surpassed the abilities of its own creators.
The paper provides a clear definition of transcendence and explores various ways in which it can manifest in different machine learning applications. The researchers conduct experiments to demonstrate the potential for transcendence and discuss the broader implications for the future of AI. As these systems become more advanced, the possibility of them surpassing human experts in certain tasks raises fascinating questions about the nature of intelligence, creativity, and the future of human-machine collaboration.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining the concept of "transcendence" in the context of generative models. Transcendence occurs when a generative model, trained on data provided by experts, is able to produce outputs that are superior to the work of those experts.
The researchers conduct a series of experiments to investigate the potential for transcendence. They train generative models on datasets curated by domain experts, such as collections of high-quality images or well-written text. The models are then evaluated on their ability to generate new outputs that are judged to be better than the original expert-curated examples.
The results of these experiments demonstrate the possibility of transcendence and provide insights into the factors that contribute to this phenomenon. The paper discusses how the scale and diversity of the training data, as well as the architectural design of the generative model, can all play a role in enabling transcendence.
Furthermore, the paper explores the implications of transcendence for the future of AI and human-machine collaboration. As generative models become more advanced, the potential for them to surpass human experts in certain creative or analytical tasks raises fascinating questions about the nature of intelligence and the evolving relationship between humans and machines.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling exploration of the concept of transcendence in generative models, but it also acknowledges several caveats and areas for further research. One significant limitation is the difficulty in objectively defining and measuring "better" outputs, as this can be highly subjective and context-dependent.
The researchers attempt to address this by using expert evaluations and well-defined metrics, but there is still room for further refinement and validation of the methods used to assess transcendence. Additionally, the paper does not fully explore the potential ethical and societal implications of generative models outperforming human experts in certain domains, such as the creation of misinformation or the disruption of established industries.
While the paper highlights the exciting potential of transcendence, it also calls for a cautious and thoughtful approach to the development and deployment of these advanced systems. Continued research and open discourse on the nuances and implications of transcendence will be crucial as the field of AI continues to evolve.
Conclusion
This paper presents a thought-provoking exploration of the concept of "transcendence" in the context of generative models. The researchers demonstrate the potential for these AI systems to surpass the abilities of the experts who trained them, raising fascinating questions about the nature of intelligence, creativity, and the future of human-machine collaboration.
While the paper acknowledges the limitations and challenges associated with assessing and defining transcendence, it highlights the exciting possibilities that emerge as generative models become increasingly advanced. As the field of AI continues to progress, the insights and discussions presented in this paper will be crucial in guiding the responsible development and deployment of these transformative technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Survey of Transformer Enabled Time Series Synthesis
Alexander Sommers, Logan Cummins, Sudip Mittal, Shahram Rahimi, Maria Seale, Joseph Jaboure, Thomas Arnold
0
0
Generative AI has received much attention in the image and language domains, with the transformer neural network continuing to dominate the state of the art. Application of these models to time series generation is less explored, however, and is of great utility to machine learning, privacy preservation, and explainability research. The present survey identifies this gap at the intersection of the transformer, generative AI, and time series data, and reviews works in this sparsely populated subdomain. The reviewed works show great variety in approach, and have not yet converged on a conclusive answer to the problems the domain poses. GANs, diffusion models, state space models, and autoencoders were all encountered alongside or surrounding the transformers which originally motivated the survey. While too open a domain to offer conclusive insights, the works surveyed are quite suggestive, and several recommendations for best practice, and suggestions of valuable future work, are provided.
6/5/2024
📉
On the rate of convergence of an over-parametrized Transformer classifier learned by gradient descent
Michael Kohler, Adam Krzyzak
0
0
One of the most recent and fascinating breakthroughs in artificial intelligence is ChatGPT, a chatbot which can simulate human conversation. ChatGPT is an instance of GPT4, which is a language model based on generative gredictive gransformers. So if one wants to study from a theoretical point of view, how powerful such artificial intelligence can be, one approach is to consider transformer networks and to study which problems one can solve with these networks theoretically. Here it is not only important what kind of models these network can approximate, or how they can generalize their knowledge learned by choosing the best possible approximation to a concrete data set, but also how well optimization of such transformer network based on concrete data set works. In this article we consider all these three different aspects simultaneously and show a theoretical upper bound on the missclassification probability of a transformer network fitted to the observed data. For simplicity we focus in this context on transformer encoder networks which can be applied to define an estimate in the context of a classification problem involving natural language.
6/21/2024
🔎
Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models
Shi Fu, Sen Zhang, Yingjie Wang, Xinmei Tian, Dacheng Tao
0
0
This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop, wherein successive generations of models are recursively trained on mixtures of real and synthetic data from previous generations. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models, including parametric and non-parametric models. Specifically, we derive bounds on the total variation (TV) distance between the synthetic data distributions produced by future models and the original real data distribution under various mixed training scenarios for diffusion models with a one-hidden-layer neural network score function. Our analysis demonstrates that this distance can be effectively controlled under the condition that mixed training dataset sizes or proportions of real data are large enough. Interestingly, we further unveil a phase transition induced by expanding synthetic data amounts, proving theoretically that while the TV distance exhibits an initial ascent, it declines beyond a threshold point. Finally, we present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
6/26/2024
🏋️
The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget
Ilia Shumailov, Zakhar Shumaylov, Yiren Zhao, Yarin Gal, Nicolas Papernot, Ross Anderson
0
0
Stable Diffusion revolutionised image creation from descriptive text. GPT-2, GPT-3(.5) and GPT-4 demonstrated astonishing performance across a variety of language tasks. ChatGPT introduced such language models to the general public. It is now clear that large language models (LLMs) are here to stay, and will bring about drastic change in the whole ecosystem of online text and images. In this paper we consider what the future might hold. What will happen to GPT-{n} once LLMs contribute much of the language found online? We find that use of model-generated content in training causes irreversible defects in the resulting models, where tails of the original content distribution disappear. We refer to this effect as Model Collapse and show that it can occur in Variational Autoencoders, Gaussian Mixture Models and LLMs. We build theoretical intuition behind the phenomenon and portray its ubiquity amongst all learned generative models. We demonstrate that it has to be taken seriously if we are to sustain the benefits of training from large-scale data scraped from the web. Indeed, the value of data collected about genuine human interactions with systems will be increasingly valuable in the presence of content generated by LLMs in data crawled from the Internet.
4/16/2024