Towards Risk Analysis of the Impact of AI on the Deliberate Biological Threat Landscape

Read original: arXiv:2401.12755 - Published 6/12/2024 by Matthew E. Walsh
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides an overview of the biblatex package, which is a popular tool for managing bibliographic references in LaTeX documents.
  • The paper discusses the key features and capabilities of the biblatex package, as well as how it differs from the traditional BibTeX approach.
  • It covers topics such as managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress, approaching emergent risks through an exploratory study, and incorporating both safety and robustness in AI risk management.

Plain English Explanation

The biblatex package is a tool that helps researchers and writers manage their bibliographic references when using the LaTeX typesetting system. Instead of the traditional BibTeX approach, which can be complex and inflexible, biblatex offers a more streamlined and customizable way to handle citations and references.

With biblatex, you can easily organize your literature sources, format citations in various styles (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago), and automatically generate a bibliography at the end of your document. The package also provides advanced features, such as the ability to manage the potential implications of governance and public perceptions on societal-scale AI and assess the spatially sensitive nature-related risks associated with AI.

By using biblatex, researchers and writers can save time and effort in managing their references, allowing them to focus more on the content and quality of their work.

Technical Explanation

The biblatex package is a comprehensive solution for handling bibliographic references in LaTeX documents. It replaces the traditional BibTeX approach, which can be complex and inflexible, with a more streamlined and customizable system.

One of the key features of biblatex is its ability to format citations and references in a wide range of styles, including APA, MLA, and Chicago. This flexibility allows users to easily adapt their bibliographic formatting to the requirements of different journals or publications.

The package also provides advanced capabilities, such as the ability to manage extreme AI risks amid rapid progress, approach emergent risks through an exploratory study, and incorporate both safety and robustness in AI risk management. These features can be particularly useful for researchers working on complex topics related to the societal implications of AI.

Overall, the biblatex package offers a powerful and versatile solution for managing bibliographic references in LaTeX, making it a valuable tool for researchers, writers, and academics.

Critical Analysis

The biblatex package is a robust and feature-rich solution for managing bibliographic references in LaTeX documents. However, as with any tool, there are some potential limitations and areas for further research.

One potential concern is the complexity of the package, which may present a steeper learning curve for some users, especially those unfamiliar with LaTeX. While biblatex aims to simplify the reference management process, the sheer number of features and customization options could be overwhelming for some users.

Additionally, while the package offers a wide range of citation styles, there may be instances where users require a specific format that is not readily available. In such cases, users may need to invest time in creating custom styles or modifying existing ones.

Furthermore, the paper could have provided more in-depth discussion on the implications of governance and public perceptions on societal-scale AI, as well as the potential risks associated with the spatially sensitive nature-related aspects of AI. These topics are of growing importance in the field of AI research and could have been explored further.

Overall, the biblatex package is a powerful and versatile tool for managing bibliographic references in LaTeX, but users should be aware of its potential limitations and be prepared to invest time in mastering its advanced features.

Conclusion

The biblatex package offers a comprehensive solution for managing bibliographic references in LaTeX documents. By providing a more streamlined and customizable approach compared to traditional BibTeX, biblatex can save researchers and writers time and effort in organizing their sources and formatting citations.

The package's advanced features, such as the ability to manage extreme AI risks amid rapid progress, approach emergent risks through an exploratory study, and incorporate both safety and robustness in AI risk management, make it a valuable tool for researchers working on complex topics related to the societal implications of AI.

While the biblatex package may present a learning curve for some users, its powerful features and flexibility make it a worthwhile investment for anyone looking to streamline their bibliographic management in LaTeX.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

Towards Risk Analysis of the Impact of AI on the Deliberate Biological Threat Landscape

Matthew E. Walsh

The perception that the convergence of biological engineering and artificial intelligence (AI) could enable increased biorisk has recently drawn attention to the governance of biotechnology and artificial intelligence. The 2023 Executive Order, Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence, requires an assessment of how artificial intelligence can increase biorisk. Within this perspective, quantitative and qualitative frameworks for evaluating biorisk are presented. Both frameworks are exercised using notional scenarios and their benefits and limitations are then discussed. Finally, the perspective concludes by noting that assessment and evaluation methodologies must keep pace with advances of AI in the life sciences.

Read more

6/12/2024

Total Score

0

Prioritizing High-Consequence Biological Capabilities in Evaluations of Artificial Intelligence Models

Jaspreet Pannu, Doni Bloomfield, Alex Zhu, Robert MacKnight, Gabe Gomes, Anita Cicero, Thomas V. Inglesby

As a result of rapidly accelerating AI capabilities, over the past year, national governments and multinational bodies have announced efforts to address safety, security and ethics issues related to AI models. One high priority among these efforts is the mitigation of misuse of AI models. Many biologists have for decades sought to reduce the risks of scientific research that could lead, through accident or misuse, to high-consequence disease outbreaks. Scientists have carefully considered what types of life sciences research have the potential for both benefit and risk (dual-use), especially as scientific advances have accelerated our ability to engineer organisms and create novel variants of pathogens. Here we describe how previous experience and study by scientists and policy professionals of dual-use capabilities in the life sciences can inform risk evaluations of AI models with biological capabilities. We argue that AI model evaluations should prioritize addressing high-consequence risks (those that could cause large-scale harm to the public, such as pandemics), and that these risks should be evaluated prior to model deployment so as to allow potential biosafety and/or biosecurity measures. Scientists' experience with identifying and mitigating dual-use biological risks can help inform new approaches to evaluating biological AI models. Identifying which AI capabilities post the greatest biosecurity and biosafety concerns is necessary in order to establish targeted AI safety evaluation methods, secure these tools against accident and misuse, and avoid impeding immense potential benefits.

Read more

7/24/2024

📈

Total Score

0

The Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence: Balancing Risks and Benefits Through Practical Solutions and Use Cases

Richard Fulton (Department of Computer Science, Troy University, Troy, Alabama, USA), Diane Fulton (Department of Management, Clayton State University, Morrow, Georgia, USA), Nate Hayes (Modal Technologies, Minneapolis, Minnesota), Susan Kaplan (Modal Technologies, Minneapolis, Minnesota)

This paper summarizes the most cogent advantages and risks associated with Artificial Intelligence from an in-depth review of the literature. Then the authors synthesize the salient risk-related models currently being used in AI, technology and business-related scenarios. Next, in view of an updated context of AI along with theories and models reviewed and expanded constructs, the writers propose a new framework called The Transformation Risk-Benefit Model of Artificial Intelligence to address the increasing fears and levels of AI risk. Using the model characteristics, the article emphasizes practical and innovative solutions where benefits outweigh risks and three use cases in healthcare, climate change/environment and cyber security to illustrate unique interplay of principles, dimensions and processes of this powerful AI transformational model.

Read more

6/19/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress

Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Andrew Yao, Dawn Song, Pieter Abbeel, Trevor Darrell, Yuval Noah Harari, Ya-Qin Zhang, Lan Xue, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Gillian Hadfield, Jeff Clune, Tegan Maharaj, Frank Hutter, At{i}l{i}m Gunec{s} Baydin, Sheila McIlraith, Qiqi Gao, Ashwin Acharya, David Krueger, Anca Dragan, Philip Torr, Stuart Russell, Daniel Kahneman, Jan Brauner, Soren Mindermann

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is progressing rapidly, and companies are shifting their focus to developing generalist AI systems that can autonomously act and pursue goals. Increases in capabilities and autonomy may soon massively amplify AI's impact, with risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and an irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. Although researchers have warned of extreme risks from AI, there is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Society's response, despite promising first steps, is incommensurate with the possibility of rapid, transformative progress that is expected by many experts. AI safety research is lagging. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems. In this short consensus paper, we describe extreme risks from upcoming, advanced AI systems. Drawing on lessons learned from other safety-critical technologies, we then outline a comprehensive plan combining technical research and development with proactive, adaptive governance mechanisms for a more commensurate preparation.

Read more

5/24/2024