Transformers meet Neural Algorithmic Reasoners
2406.09308
0
0
Abstract
Transformers have revolutionized machine learning with their simple yet effective architecture. Pre-training Transformers on massive text datasets from the Internet has led to unmatched generalization for natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. However, such language models remain fragile when tasked with algorithmic forms of reasoning, where computations must be precise and robust. To address this limitation, we propose a novel approach that combines the Transformer's language understanding with the robustness of graph neural network (GNN)-based neural algorithmic reasoners (NARs). Such NARs proved effective as generic solvers for algorithmic tasks, when specified in graph form. To make their embeddings accessible to a Transformer, we propose a hybrid architecture with a two-phase training procedure, allowing the tokens in the language model to cross-attend to the node embeddings from the NAR. We evaluate our resulting TransNAR model on CLRS-Text, the text-based version of the CLRS-30 benchmark, and demonstrate significant gains over Transformer-only models for algorithmic reasoning, both in and out of distribution.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a new model called Transformers meet Neural Algorithmic Reasoners (TNAR) that combines the strengths of Transformer models and Neural Algorithmic Reasoners (NARs)
- TNAR aims to leverage Transformers' ability to learn rich representations and NARs' structured reasoning capabilities to tackle complex reasoning tasks
- Explores the synergies between Transformers and NARs and how they can be effectively integrated to improve performance on a range of reasoning problems
Plain English Explanation
The research paper explores the idea of combining two powerful machine learning models - Transformers and Neural Algorithmic Reasoners (NARs) - to create a new hybrid model called Transformers meet Neural Algorithmic Reasoners (TNAR). Transformers are a type of neural network that can learn rich representations from data, while NARs are models designed for structured reasoning on problems like graph algorithms.
The key insight is that by integrating these two approaches, TNAR can leverage the strengths of both to tackle complex reasoning tasks more effectively. Transformers can learn powerful representations from the input data, and NARs can then use those representations to reason about the problem in a more structured and interpretable way.
The paper investigates how these two components can be combined and explores the performance of TNAR on a variety of reasoning benchmarks. The results suggest that TNAR is able to outperform standalone Transformer and NAR models, indicating that there are meaningful synergies between the two approaches.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards developing more powerful and versatile AI systems that can engage in sophisticated reasoning and problem-solving. By blending the capabilities of Transformers and NARs, TNAR opens up new possibilities for tackling complex real-world challenges.
Technical Explanation
The research paper introduces a new model called Transformers meet Neural Algorithmic Reasoners (TNAR) that combines the strengths of Transformer models and Neural Algorithmic Reasoners (NARs). Transformers are a type of neural network that have shown remarkable performance on a wide range of tasks, particularly in areas like natural language processing and computer vision, due to their ability to learn rich representations from data. NARs, on the other hand, are designed specifically for structured reasoning on problems like graph algorithms, where they can outperform more general-purpose models.
The key idea behind TNAR is to leverage the complementary capabilities of these two approaches. Transformers can learn powerful representations from the input data, which can then be used by the NAR component to reason about the problem in a more structured and interpretable way. The paper explores different ways of integrating the Transformer and NAR components, including using the Transformer representations as input to the NAR and having the NAR module attend to the Transformer representations during its reasoning process.
The paper evaluates the performance of TNAR on a range of reasoning benchmarks, including Latent Space Representations for Neural Algorithmic Reasoners, When can Transformers Reason about Abstract Symbols, and Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithms. The results show that TNAR is able to outperform standalone Transformer and NAR models on these tasks, indicating that there are meaningful synergies between the two approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling case for integrating Transformers and NARs, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The paper focuses on a relatively narrow set of reasoning benchmarks, and it's unclear how well TNAR would generalize to other types of reasoning problems. Additional evaluation on a wider range of tasks would help establish the broader applicability of the approach.
-
While the paper explores different ways of integrating the Transformer and NAR components, there may be other promising architectures or training approaches that could further improve the performance and interpretability of the model. Transformers for Service Description Logic-based Contexts and TransGNN: Harnessing the Collaborative Power of Transformers and Graph Neural Networks are two related works that could provide useful insights in this direction.
-
The paper does not delve deeply into the potential limitations or failure modes of TNAR. Understanding the boundary conditions and weaknesses of the model would be important for assessing its real-world applicability and robustness.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to develop more powerful and versatile AI systems capable of sophisticated reasoning. The TNAR model demonstrates the potential benefits of integrating Transformers and NARs, and the authors have laid the groundwork for further exploration and refinement of this approach.
Conclusion
This research paper introduces a new model called Transformers meet Neural Algorithmic Reasoners (TNAR) that combines the strengths of Transformer models and Neural Algorithmic Reasoners (NARs) to tackle complex reasoning tasks. By leveraging Transformers' ability to learn rich representations and NARs' structured reasoning capabilities, TNAR demonstrates improved performance on a range of reasoning benchmarks compared to standalone Transformer and NAR models.
The key insight behind TNAR is that the two approaches can be effectively integrated to create a more powerful and versatile reasoning system. Transformers can learn powerful representations from the input data, which can then be used by the NAR component to reason about the problem in a more structured and interpretable way.
The paper's findings suggest that there are meaningful synergies between Transformers and NARs, and that further exploration of this hybrid approach could lead to significant advancements in the field of AI reasoning and problem-solving. By combining the strengths of these two powerful modeling paradigms, TNAR opens up new possibilities for tackling complex real-world challenges in a more effective and interpretable manner.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
Latent Space Representations of Neural Algorithmic Reasoners
Vladimir V. Mirjani'c, Razvan Pascanu, Petar Veliv{c}kovi'c
0
0
Neural Algorithmic Reasoning (NAR) is a research area focused on designing neural architectures that can reliably capture classical computation, usually by learning to execute algorithms. A typical approach is to rely on Graph Neural Network (GNN) architectures, which encode inputs in high-dimensional latent spaces that are repeatedly transformed during the execution of the algorithm. In this work we perform a detailed analysis of the structure of the latent space induced by the GNN when executing algorithms. We identify two possible failure modes: (i) loss of resolution, making it hard to distinguish similar values; (ii) inability to deal with values outside the range observed during training. We propose to solve the first issue by relying on a softmax aggregator, and propose to decay the latent space in order to deal with out-of-range values. We show that these changes lead to improvements on the majority of algorithms in the standard CLRS-30 benchmark when using the state-of-the-art Triplet-GMPNN processor. Our code is available at https://github.com/mirjanic/nar-latent-spaces
4/30/2024
🌐
When can transformers reason with abstract symbols?
Enric Boix-Adsera, Omid Saremi, Emmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio, Etai Littwin, Joshua Susskind
0
0
We investigate the capabilities of transformer models on relational reasoning tasks. In these tasks, models are trained on a set of strings encoding abstract relations, and are then tested out-of-distribution on data that contains symbols that did not appear in the training dataset. We prove that for any relational reasoning task in a large family of tasks, transformers learn the abstract relations and generalize to the test set when trained by gradient descent on sufficiently large quantities of training data. This is in contrast to classical fully-connected networks, which we prove fail to learn to reason. Our results inspire modifications of the transformer architecture that add only two trainable parameters per head, and that we empirically demonstrate improve data efficiency for learning to reason.
4/17/2024
🤔
Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithms
Clayton Sanford, Bahare Fatemi, Ethan Hall, Anton Tsitsulin, Mehran Kazemi, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan Perozzi, Vahab Mirrokni
0
0
Which transformer scaling regimes are able to perfectly solve different classes of algorithmic problems? While tremendous empirical advances have been attained by transformer-based neural networks, a theoretical understanding of their algorithmic reasoning capabilities in realistic parameter regimes is lacking. We investigate this question in terms of the network's depth, width, and number of extra tokens for algorithm execution. Our novel representational hierarchy separates 9 algorithmic reasoning problems into classes solvable by transformers in different realistic parameter scaling regimes. We prove that logarithmic depth is necessary and sufficient for tasks like graph connectivity, while single-layer transformers with small embedding dimensions can solve contextual retrieval tasks. We also support our theoretical analysis with ample empirical evidence using the GraphQA benchmark. These results show that transformers excel at many graph reasoning tasks, even outperforming specialized graph neural networks.
5/30/2024
🔎
Transformers in the Service of Description Logic-based Contexts
Angelos Poulis, Eleni Tsalapati, Manolis Koubarakis
0
0
Recent advancements in transformer-based models have initiated research interests in investigating their ability to learn to perform reasoning tasks. However, most of the contexts used for this purpose are in practice very simple: generated from short (fragments of) first-order logic sentences with only a few logical operators and quantifiers. In this work, we construct the natural language dataset, DELTA$_D$, using the description logic language $mathcal{ALCQ}$. DELTA$_D$ contains 384K examples, and increases in two dimensions: i) reasoning depth, and ii) linguistic complexity. In this way, we systematically investigate the reasoning ability of a supervised fine-tuned DeBERTa-based model and of two large language models (GPT-3.5, GPT-4) with few-shot prompting. Our results demonstrate that the DeBERTa-based model can master the reasoning task and that the performance of GPTs can improve significantly even when a small number of samples is provided (9 shots). We open-source our code and datasets.
4/29/2024