Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithms
2405.18512
0
0
🤔
Abstract
Which transformer scaling regimes are able to perfectly solve different classes of algorithmic problems? While tremendous empirical advances have been attained by transformer-based neural networks, a theoretical understanding of their algorithmic reasoning capabilities in realistic parameter regimes is lacking. We investigate this question in terms of the network's depth, width, and number of extra tokens for algorithm execution. Our novel representational hierarchy separates 9 algorithmic reasoning problems into classes solvable by transformers in different realistic parameter scaling regimes. We prove that logarithmic depth is necessary and sufficient for tasks like graph connectivity, while single-layer transformers with small embedding dimensions can solve contextual retrieval tasks. We also support our theoretical analysis with ample empirical evidence using the GraphQA benchmark. These results show that transformers excel at many graph reasoning tasks, even outperforming specialized graph neural networks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the algorithmic reasoning capabilities of transformer-based neural networks in realistic parameter regimes.
- It proposes a novel representational hierarchy that separates 9 algorithmic reasoning problems into different classes solvable by transformers.
- The paper proves that logarithmic depth is necessary and sufficient for tasks like graph connectivity, while single-layer transformers with small embedding dimensions can solve contextual retrieval tasks.
- Empirical evidence using the GraphQA benchmark supports the theoretical analysis, showing that transformers excel at many graph reasoning tasks, even outperforming specialized graph neural networks.
Plain English Explanation
Transformer-based neural networks have achieved tremendous success in a wide range of applications, but the theoretical understanding of their algorithmic reasoning capabilities is limited. This paper explores the types of algorithmic problems that transformers can solve, and the specific network properties required to solve them.
The researchers created a new way to categorize different algorithmic reasoning tasks, based on the network's depth, width, and the number of extra "tokens" (small units of information) it can use. They found that for some tasks, like determining if two nodes in a graph are connected, the network needs to be deep (have many layers). But for other tasks, like retrieving relevant information based on context, a shallow network with small embedding dimensions (the size of the information units) can be sufficient.
To support these theoretical findings, the researchers used a benchmark called GraphQA, which tests how well models can reason about graphs. The results showed that transformers are remarkably good at many graph reasoning tasks, even outperforming specialized graph neural networks. This suggests that transformers have powerful algorithmic reasoning capabilities that can be applied to a wide variety of problems.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the algorithmic reasoning capabilities of transformer-based neural networks, which have achieved remarkable empirical success but lack a strong theoretical understanding. The authors propose a novel representational hierarchy that separates 9 algorithmic reasoning problems into different classes solvable by transformers in varying parameter regimes.
Theoretically, the paper proves that logarithmic depth is necessary and sufficient for tasks like graph connectivity, while single-layer transformers with small embedding dimensions can solve contextual retrieval tasks. This is supported by empirical evidence using the GraphQA benchmark, which shows that transformers excel at many graph reasoning tasks, outperforming even specialized graph neural networks.
The authors also explore the multi-step reasoning capabilities of transformers, demonstrating their ability to solve complex algorithmic problems by attending to relevant graph structures.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the algorithmic reasoning capabilities of transformer-based models, which is an important area of research. The theoretical analysis and empirical evidence presented are rigorous and compelling. However, the study is limited to a specific set of algorithmic reasoning tasks, and it would be interesting to see how the findings extend to a broader range of problems.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential biases or limitations of the GraphQA benchmark, which could influence the observed performance of the transformers. Further research is needed to understand how these models perform on a wider range of benchmarks and real-world applications.
Overall, this paper is a significant contribution to the understanding of transformer models and their algorithmic reasoning capabilities. It encourages researchers to think critically about the strengths and limitations of these powerful neural networks and to explore their potential applications in more depth.
Conclusion
This paper provides a novel theoretical and empirical examination of the algorithmic reasoning capabilities of transformer-based neural networks. By proposing a representational hierarchy and analyzing the network properties required to solve different classes of algorithmic problems, the authors have made important strides in understanding the capabilities and limitations of these models.
The key takeaway is that transformers excel at many graph reasoning tasks, outperforming even specialized graph neural networks. This suggests that transformers have powerful algorithmic reasoning abilities that can be leveraged in a wide range of applications. As the field of machine learning continues to advance, this research contributes to our understanding of how these models can be used to tackle complex, real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
When can transformers reason with abstract symbols?
Enric Boix-Adsera, Omid Saremi, Emmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio, Etai Littwin, Joshua Susskind
0
0
We investigate the capabilities of transformer models on relational reasoning tasks. In these tasks, models are trained on a set of strings encoding abstract relations, and are then tested out-of-distribution on data that contains symbols that did not appear in the training dataset. We prove that for any relational reasoning task in a large family of tasks, transformers learn the abstract relations and generalize to the test set when trained by gradient descent on sufficiently large quantities of training data. This is in contrast to classical fully-connected networks, which we prove fail to learn to reason. Our results inspire modifications of the transformer architecture that add only two trainable parameters per head, and that we empirically demonstrate improve data efficiency for learning to reason.
4/17/2024
Transformers meet Neural Algorithmic Reasoners
Wilfried Bounsi, Borja Ibarz, Andrew Dudzik, Jessica B. Hamrick, Larisa Markeeva, Alex Vitvitskyi, Razvan Pascanu, Petar Veliv{c}kovi'c
0
0
Transformers have revolutionized machine learning with their simple yet effective architecture. Pre-training Transformers on massive text datasets from the Internet has led to unmatched generalization for natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. However, such language models remain fragile when tasked with algorithmic forms of reasoning, where computations must be precise and robust. To address this limitation, we propose a novel approach that combines the Transformer's language understanding with the robustness of graph neural network (GNN)-based neural algorithmic reasoners (NARs). Such NARs proved effective as generic solvers for algorithmic tasks, when specified in graph form. To make their embeddings accessible to a Transformer, we propose a hybrid architecture with a two-phase training procedure, allowing the tokens in the language model to cross-attend to the node embeddings from the NAR. We evaluate our resulting TransNAR model on CLRS-Text, the text-based version of the CLRS-30 benchmark, and demonstrate significant gains over Transformer-only models for algorithmic reasoning, both in and out of distribution.
6/14/2024
📉
The Expressive Power of Transformers with Chain of Thought
William Merrill, Ashish Sabharwal
0
0
Recent theoretical work has identified surprisingly simple reasoning problems, such as checking if two nodes in a graph are connected or simulating finite-state machines, that are provably unsolvable by standard transformers that answer immediately after reading their input. However, in practice, transformers' reasoning can be improved by allowing them to use a chain of thought or scratchpad, i.e., generate and condition on a sequence of intermediate tokens before answering. Motivated by this, we ask: Does such intermediate generation fundamentally extend the computational power of a decoder-only transformer? We show that the answer is yes, but the amount of increase depends crucially on the amount of intermediate generation. For instance, we find that transformer decoders with a logarithmic number of decoding steps (w.r.t. the input length) push the limits of standard transformers only slightly, while a linear number of decoding steps, assuming projected pre-norm (a slight generalization of standard pre-norm), adds a clear new ability (under standard complexity conjectures): recognizing all regular languages. Our results also imply that linear steps keep transformer decoders within context-sensitive languages, and polynomial steps with generalized pre-norm make them recognize exactly the class of polynomial-time solvable problems -- the first exact characterization of a type of transformers in terms of standard complexity classes. Together, this provides a nuanced framework for understanding how the length of a transformer's chain of thought or scratchpad impacts its reasoning power.
4/15/2024
🔎
Transformers in the Service of Description Logic-based Contexts
Angelos Poulis, Eleni Tsalapati, Manolis Koubarakis
0
0
Recent advancements in transformer-based models have initiated research interests in investigating their ability to learn to perform reasoning tasks. However, most of the contexts used for this purpose are in practice very simple: generated from short (fragments of) first-order logic sentences with only a few logical operators and quantifiers. In this work, we construct the natural language dataset, DELTA$_D$, using the description logic language $mathcal{ALCQ}$. DELTA$_D$ contains 384K examples, and increases in two dimensions: i) reasoning depth, and ii) linguistic complexity. In this way, we systematically investigate the reasoning ability of a supervised fine-tuned DeBERTa-based model and of two large language models (GPT-3.5, GPT-4) with few-shot prompting. Our results demonstrate that the DeBERTa-based model can master the reasoning task and that the performance of GPTs can improve significantly even when a small number of samples is provided (9 shots). We open-source our code and datasets.
4/29/2024