A Treatment of EIP-1559: Enhancing Transaction Fee Mechanism through Nth-Price Auction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a new transaction fee mechanism called EIP-1559 to enhance the Ethereum blockchain's transaction fee mechanism
- Proposes using an N^th-price auction instead of the previous first-price auction
- Claims the new mechanism improves incentive compatibility and reduces transaction fee volatility
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a new approach to how transaction fees work on the Ethereum blockchain, called EIP-1559. The key idea is to use an N^th-price auction instead of the previous first-price auction system.
In a first-price auction, users bid whatever they're willing to pay for their transaction to be processed. The miner simply takes the highest bid. The new N^th-price auction works differently - all winning bids pay the same price, which is the Nth highest bid.
The authors claim this new mechanism has several benefits. First, it should be more incentive compatible, meaning users have a stronger incentive to bid their true valuation rather than trying to game the system. Second, it may reduce volatility in transaction fees, providing more stability for users.
Overall, the paper proposes a novel approach to the critical issue of transaction fee design in blockchain networks like Ethereum.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by outlining the limitations of Ethereum's previous first-price auction transaction fee mechanism. This includes issues around incentive compatibility, as users may bid strategically rather than their true valuation, as well as high fee volatility.
To address these problems, the authors propose using an N^th-price auction instead. In this scheme, transactions are ordered by their bid, and the Nth highest bid determines the clearing price paid by all winning bidders. This contrasts with the first-price auction where each user pays their own bid.
The authors provide a formal model and analysis to show how the N^th-price auction improves incentive compatibility compared to the first-price auction. They also demonstrate through simulations that the new mechanism can reduce transaction fee volatility.
Additionally, the paper discusses how this new fee mechanism could be implemented within the Ethereum protocol through the EIP-1559 proposal. This includes details around the base fee, priority fee, and other technical aspects.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-reasoned and formally-grounded case for adopting the N^th-price auction approach to enhance Ethereum's transaction fee mechanism. The authors thoughtfully address key limitations of the existing system and offer a clear technical solution.
That said, the analysis is limited to a theoretical model and simulations. Real-world implementation and empirical evaluation would be needed to fully assess the merits and drawbacks of EIP-1559 in practice. Aspects like miner incentives, user adoption, and interactions with other protocol features would require further study.
The paper also does not deeply explore potential unintended consequences or edge cases that could arise from this architectural change. Robust testing and careful monitoring would be crucial if EIP-1559 were to be deployed.
Overall, the research presents a compelling technical proposal that merits serious consideration, but real-world validation and a more comprehensive risk assessment would be valuable before adoption.
Conclusion
This paper outlines an innovative approach to improving the transaction fee mechanism of the Ethereum blockchain through the EIP-1559 proposal. By shifting from a first-price to an N^th-price auction, the authors claim the new system would enhance incentive compatibility and reduce fee volatility.
The technical analysis and modeling are rigorous, but empirical validation and further study of potential pitfalls would be valuable before real-world implementation. If successfully deployed, EIP-1559 could represent a significant advancement in blockchain fee design that benefits both users and the network as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Treatment of EIP-1559: Enhancing Transaction Fee Mechanism through Nth-Price Auction
Kun Li, Guangpeng Qi, Guangyong Shang, Wanli Deng, Minghui Xu, Xiuzhen Cheng
With the widespread adoption of blockchain technology, the transaction fee mechanism (TFM) in blockchain systems has become a prominent research topic. An ideal TFM should satisfy user incentive compatibility (UIC), miner incentive compatibility (MIC), and miner-user side contract proofness ($c$-SCP). However, state-of-the-art works either fail to meet these three properties simultaneously or only satisfy them under certain conditions. In this paper, we propose a burning $N$-price auction TFM named BNP. This mechanism divides the transaction fee into a base fee, which is burned, and a priority fee, which is allocated to miners. Theoretical proofs and experimental analyses demonstrate that, even under conditions of significant transaction congestion, this mechanism satisfies UIC, MIC, and $c$-SCP simultaneously. Furthermore, the BNP mechanism is not constrained by the type of blockchain consensus, making it widely applicable.
Read more6/28/2024
🌐
0
Combinatorial Auctions without a Numeraire: The Case of Blockchain Trade-Intent Auctions
Andrea Canidio, Felix Henneke
Blockchain trade intent auctions currently intermediate approximately USD 5 billion monthly. Due to production complementarities, the auction is combinatorial: when multiple trade intents from different traders are auctioned off simultaneously, a bidder (here called solver) can generate additional efficiencies by winning a batch of multiple trade intents. However, unlike other combinatorial auctions studied in the literature, the auction has no numeraire. Fairness is a concern as the efficiencies from batching cannot be easily shared between traders. We formalize this problem and study the most commonly used auction formats: batch auctions and multiple simultaneous auctions. We also propose a novel fair combinatorial auction that combines batch auction and multiple simultaneous auctions: solvers submit individual-trade bids and batched bids, but batched bids are considered only if they are better for all traders relative to the outcome of multiple simultaneous auctions (constructed using the individual-trade bids). We find a trade-off between the fairness guarantees provided by the auction (i.e., the minimum each trader can expect to receive) and the expected value of the assets returned to the traders. Also, the amount that each trader receives in the equilibrium of the fair combinatorial auction may be higher or lower than what they receive in the equilibrium of the simultaneous auctions used as a benchmark for fairness.
Read more8/23/2024
🚀
0
Ticket-based multi-strand method for increased efficiency in proof-of-work based blockchains
Elias Rudberg
This paper outlines a method aiming to increase the efficiency of proof-of-work based blockchains using a ticket-based approach. To avoid the limitation of serially adding one block at a time to a blockchain, multiple semi-independent chains are used such that several valid blocks can be added in parallel, when they are added to separate chains. Blocks are added to different chains, the chain index being determined by a ``ticket'' that the miner must produce before creating a new block. This allows increasing the transaction rate by several orders of magnitude while the system is still fully decentralized and permissionless, and maintaining security in the sense that a successful attack would require the attacker to control a significant portion of the whole network.
Read more6/14/2024
0
User Connection and Resource Allocation Optimization in Blockchain Empowered Metaverse over 6G Wireless Communications
Liangxin Qian, Chang Liu, Jun Zhao
The convergence of blockchain, Metaverse, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) brings transformative digital opportunities alongside challenges like privacy and resource management. Addressing these, we focus on optimizing user connectivity and resource allocation in an NFT-centric and blockchain-enabled Metaverse in this paper. Through user work-offloading, we optimize data tasks, user connection parameters, and server computing frequency division. In the resource allocation phase, we optimize communication-computation resource distributions, including bandwidth, transmit power, and computing frequency. We introduce the trust-cost ratio (TCR), a pivotal measure combining trust scores from users' resources and server history with delay and energy costs. This balance ensures sustained user engagement and trust. The DASHF algorithm, central to our approach, encapsulates the Dinkelbach algorithm, alternating optimization, semidefinite relaxation (SDR), the Hungarian method, and a novel fractional programming technique from a recent IEEE JSAC paper [2]. The most challenging part of DASHF is to rewrite an optimization problem as Quadratically Constrained Quadratic Programming (QCQP) via carefully designed transformations, in order to be solved by SDR and the Hungarian algorithm. Extensive simulations validate the DASHF algorithm's efficacy, revealing critical insights for enhancing blockchain-Metaverse applications, especially with NFTs.
Read more7/19/2024