TVE: Learning Meta-attribution for Transferable Vision Explainer
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents LETA, a novel approach to learning transferable attribution for generic vision explainers.
- LETA aims to overcome the limitations of existing explainability methods, which often struggle with generalization and require task-specific training.
- The proposed method leverages transfer learning to enable efficient and effective attribution across diverse computer vision tasks and datasets.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new technique called LETA (Learning Transferable Attribution) that helps explain how computer vision models make their predictions. Existing explainability methods often work well for a specific task, but struggle to generalize to other tasks. LETA takes a different approach by using transfer learning to create an explainability model that can work effectively across a wide range of computer vision problems.
The key idea behind LETA is to first train the explainability model on a diverse set of computer vision tasks, allowing it to learn general principles of how visual information is used to make predictions. Then, when applied to a new task, LETA can leverage this general knowledge to provide high-quality explanations, without requiring task-specific training. This makes LETA a more flexible and efficient tool for understanding the inner workings of computer vision models.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces LETA, a framework for learning transferable attribution for generic vision explainers. LETA consists of two main components:
-
Attribution Model: This is the core explainability module that generates feature-level attributions to explain the model's predictions. LETA leverages a TexPLAIN-inspired architecture to capture task-agnostic visual representations.
-
Transfer Learning: To enable generalization, LETA employs a transfer learning approach. The attribution model is first pre-trained on a diverse set of computer vision tasks, allowing it to learn transferable visual representations and attribution patterns. When applied to a new task, only the final layers of the attribution model are fine-tuned, preserving the learned transferable knowledge.
The paper demonstrates LETA's performance on a range of computer vision benchmarks, including Benchmarking Attribution Quality for Vision Models, Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers, and T-Explainer. The results show that LETA can provide high-quality explanations while requiring significantly less task-specific training compared to existing methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and promising approach to improving the generalization capabilities of vision explainers. The transfer learning strategy employed by LETA is a compelling solution to the limitations of task-specific explainability methods.
However, the paper does not address several potential concerns. For instance, the performance of LETA on edge cases or adversarial examples is not evaluated, which could be an important consideration for the practical deployment of such explainability tools. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational efficiency and scalability of LETA, which could be crucial factors in real-world applications.
Furthermore, the paper would benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the limitations and failure modes of LETA. Understanding the edge cases and potential pitfalls of the proposed method would help researchers and practitioners assess its suitability for their specific use cases.
Conclusion
The LETA framework represents a significant advancement in the field of vision explainability by addressing the generalization challenges of existing methods. The transfer learning approach enables efficient and effective attribution across diverse computer vision tasks, making LETA a valuable tool for understanding the inner workings of complex visual models.
While the paper presents promising results, further research is needed to fully assess the capabilities and limitations of LETA, particularly in terms of robustness, computational efficiency, and scalability. Nonetheless, the innovative ideas and strong performance of LETA make it a compelling contribution to the ongoing efforts to improve the transparency and interpretability of computer vision systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
TVE: Learning Meta-attribution for Transferable Vision Explainer
Guanchu Wang, Yu-Neng Chuang, Fan Yang, Mengnan Du, Chia-Yuan Chang, Shaochen Zhong, Zirui Liu, Zhaozhuo Xu, Kaixiong Zhou, Xuanting Cai, Xia Hu
Explainable machine learning significantly improves the transparency of deep neural networks. However, existing work is constrained to explaining the behavior of individual model predictions, and lacks the ability to transfer the explanation across various models and tasks. This limitation results in explaining various tasks being time- and resource-consuming. To address this problem, we introduce a Transferable Vision Explainer (TVE) that can effectively explain various vision models in downstream tasks. Specifically, the transferability of TVE is realized through a pre-training process on large-scale datasets towards learning the meta-attribution. This meta-attribution leverages the versatility of generic backbone encoders to comprehensively encode the attribution knowledge for the input instance, which enables TVE to seamlessly transfer to explain various downstream tasks, without the need for training on task-specific data. Empirical studies involve explaining three different architectures of vision models across three diverse downstream datasets. The experimental results indicate TVE is effective in explaining these tasks without the need for additional training on downstream data.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers: Trustworthy Conceptual Explanations for Vision Foundation Models
Hengyi Wang, Shiwei Tan, Hao Wang
Vision transformers (ViTs) have emerged as a significant area of focus, particularly for their capacity to be jointly trained with large language models and to serve as robust vision foundation models. Yet, the development of trustworthy explanation methods for ViTs has lagged, particularly in the context of post-hoc interpretations of ViT predictions. Existing sub-image selection approaches, such as feature-attribution and conceptual models, fall short in this regard. This paper proposes five desiderata for explaining ViTs -- faithfulness, stability, sparsity, multi-level structure, and parsimony -- and demonstrates the inadequacy of current methods in meeting these criteria comprehensively. We introduce a variational Bayesian explanation framework, dubbed ProbAbilistic Concept Explainers (PACE), which models the distributions of patch embeddings to provide trustworthy post-hoc conceptual explanations. Our qualitative analysis reveals the distributions of patch-level concepts, elucidating the effectiveness of ViTs by modeling the joint distribution of patch embeddings and ViT's predictions. Moreover, these patch-level explanations bridge the gap between image-level and dataset-level explanations, thus completing the multi-level structure of PACE. Through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrate that PACE surpasses state-of-the-art methods in terms of the defined desiderata.
Read more6/21/2024
📉
0
T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradients
Evandro S. Ortigossa, F'abio F. Dias, Brian Barr, Claudio T. Silva, Luis Gustavo Nonato
The development of machine learning applications has increased significantly in recent years, motivated by the remarkable ability of learning-powered systems to discover and generalize intricate patterns hidden in massive datasets. Modern learning models, while powerful, often have a level of complexity that renders them opaque black boxes, resulting in a notable lack of transparency that hinders our ability to decipher their reasoning. Opacity challenges the interpretability and practical application of machine learning, especially in critical domains where understanding the underlying reasons is essential for informed decision-making. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) rises to address that challenge, unraveling the complexity of black boxes by providing elucidating explanations. Among the various XAI approaches, feature attribution/importance stands out for its capacity to delineate the significance of input features in the prediction process. However, most existing attribution methods have limitations, such as instability, when divergent explanations may result from similar or even the same instance. This work introduces T-Explainer, a novel local additive attribution explainer based on Taylor expansion. It has desirable properties, such as local accuracy and consistency, making T-Explainer stable over multiple runs. We demonstrate T-Explainer's effectiveness in quantitative benchmark experiments against well-known attribution methods. Additionally, we provide several tools to evaluate and visualize explanations, turning T-Explainer into a comprehensive XAI framework.
Read more8/7/2024
👀
0
Benchmarking the Attribution Quality of Vision Models
Robin Hesse, Simone Schaub-Meyer, Stefan Roth
Attribution maps are one of the most established tools to explain the functioning of computer vision models. They assign importance scores to input features, indicating how relevant each feature is for the prediction of a deep neural network. While much research has gone into proposing new attribution methods, their proper evaluation remains a difficult challenge. In this work, we propose a novel evaluation protocol that overcomes two fundamental limitations of the widely used incremental-deletion protocol, i.e., the out-of-domain issue and lacking inter-model comparisons. This allows us to evaluate 23 attribution methods and how eight different design choices of popular vision models affect their attribution quality. We find that intrinsically explainable models outperform standard models and that raw attribution values exhibit a higher attribution quality than what is known from previous work. Further, we show consistent changes in the attribution quality when varying the network design, indicating that some standard design choices promote attribution quality.
Read more7/17/2024