Two Effects, One Trigger: On the Modality Gap, Object Bias, and Information Imbalance in Contrastive Vision-Language Representation Learning
2404.07983
0
0
Abstract
Contrastive vision-language models like CLIP have gained popularity for their versatile applicable learned representations in various downstream tasks. Despite their successes in some tasks, like zero-shot image recognition, they also perform surprisingly poor on other tasks, like attribute detection. Previous work has attributed these challenges to the modality gap, a separation of image and text in the shared representation space, and a bias towards objects over other factors, such as attributes. In this work we investigate both phenomena. We find that only a few embedding dimensions drive the modality gap. Further, we propose a measure for object bias and find that object bias does not lead to worse performance on other concepts, such as attributes. But what leads to the emergence of the modality gap and object bias? To answer this question we carefully designed an experimental setting which allows us to control the amount of shared information between the modalities. This revealed that the driving factor behind both, the modality gap and the object bias, is the information imbalance between images and captions.
Create account to get full access
Related Work
The paper discusses several related areas of research on biases and imbalances in multimodal machine learning models. Cross-modality debiasing using language to mitigate explores how language can be used to mitigate biases in vision-language models. Quantifying & mitigating unimodal biases in multimodal large language models investigates biases in multimodal models and ways to address them. Social counterfactuals: Probing and mitigating intersectional social biases in vision looks at mitigating social biases in vision models. Additionally, Compensatory biases under cognitive load: Reducing selection examines how cognitive load can lead to compensatory biases.
Overview
- The paper examines two key issues in contrastive vision-language representation learning: the modality gap and information imbalance.
- It investigates how these issues contribute to object bias, where models focus more on salient objects in images rather than the broader context.
- The authors propose a framework to quantify and mitigate these problems, aiming to improve the quality and fairness of vision-language models.
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at some of the challenges in training AI models that learn to understand both images and language. One key issue is the "modality gap" - the fact that images and text convey information in different ways, making it hard for the model to fully connect the two. Another problem is "information imbalance", where the model focuses more on the obvious or salient objects in images rather than the broader context.
The researchers propose a way to measure and address these problems, with the goal of improving the overall performance and fairness of vision-language AI systems. By understanding how the modality gap and information imbalance contribute to object bias, they hope to develop better techniques for training more well-rounded and unbiased multimodal models.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores two key issues in contrastive vision-language representation learning: the modality gap and information imbalance. The modality gap refers to the inherent differences between visual and linguistic information, which makes it challenging to align the two modalities effectively. Information imbalance describes the tendency of models to focus disproportionately on salient objects in images rather than the broader context.
To quantify these problems, the authors propose several novel metrics. The modality gap is measured by comparing the information content in visual and linguistic features. Information imbalance is assessed by tracking the model's attention allocation to different image regions. The paper then investigates how these factors contribute to object bias, where models overly prioritize prominent objects at the expense of contextual understanding.
Based on these insights, the authors develop a framework to mitigate the modality gap and information imbalance. This involves techniques like cross-modal feature alignment and balanced attention modeling. Through experiments on standard vision-language benchmarks, they demonstrate improvements in both model performance and fairness.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution by systematically analyzing key challenges in contrastive vision-language representation learning. The proposed metrics for quantifying the modality gap and information imbalance offer a concrete way to diagnose these issues, which is an important step towards developing more robust and unbiased multimodal models.
However, the paper does not extensively explore the root causes of the modality gap and information imbalance. It would be helpful to understand why these problems arise in the first place, as that could inform more fundamental solutions. Additionally, while the mitigation techniques show promise, their broader applicability and scalability to larger, more complex models could be further investigated.
Another limitation is the evaluation, which focuses mainly on standard benchmark tasks. Assessing the models' performance and biases in more diverse, real-world settings would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, this paper lays important groundwork for addressing critical issues in vision-language AI. Further research building on these insights, with a focus on deeper causal analysis and more holistic evaluation, could lead to significant advancements in the field.
Conclusion
This paper sheds light on two key challenges in contrastive vision-language representation learning: the modality gap and information imbalance. By quantifying these issues and demonstrating their connection to object bias, the authors lay the foundation for developing more effective and equitable multimodal AI systems.
The proposed mitigation techniques, such as cross-modal feature alignment and balanced attention modeling, show promise in improving model performance and fairness. However, further research is needed to fully understand the root causes of these problems and explore more fundamental solutions.
As the field of vision-language AI continues to evolve, addressing the modality gap and information imbalance will be crucial for creating models that truly understand the rich interplay between visual and linguistic information. This paper represents an important step forward in this direction, paving the way for more advanced and inclusive multimodal AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Its Not a Modality Gap: Characterizing and Addressing the Contrastive Gap
Abrar Fahim, Alex Murphy, Alona Fyshe
0
0
Multi-modal contrastive models such as CLIP achieve state-of-the-art performance in zero-shot classification by embedding input images and texts on a joint representational space. Recently, a modality gap has been reported in two-encoder contrastive models like CLIP, meaning that the image and text embeddings reside in disjoint areas of the latent space. Previous studies suggest that this gap exists due to 1) the cone effect, 2) mismatched pairs in the dataset, and 3) insufficient training. We show that, even when accounting for all these factors, and even when using the same modality, the contrastive loss actually creates a gap during training. As a result, We propose that the modality gap is inherent to the two-encoder contrastive loss and rename it the contrastive gap. We present evidence that attributes this contrastive gap to low uniformity in CLIP space, resulting in embeddings that occupy only a small portion of the latent space. To close the gap, we adapt the uniformity and alignment properties of unimodal contrastive loss to the multi-modal setting and show that simply adding these terms to the CLIP loss distributes the embeddings more uniformly in the representational space, closing the gap. In our experiments, we show that the modified representational space achieves better performance than default CLIP loss in downstream tasks such as zero-shot image classification and multi-modal arithmetic.
6/10/2024
Mitigate the Gap: Investigating Approaches for Improving Cross-Modal Alignment in CLIP
Sedigheh Eslami, Gerard de Melo
0
0
Contrastive Language--Image Pre-training (CLIP) has manifested remarkable improvements in zero-shot classification and cross-modal vision-language tasks. Yet, from a geometrical point of view, the CLIP embedding space has been found to have a pronounced modality gap. This gap renders the embedding space overly sparse and disconnected, with different modalities being densely distributed in distinct subregions of the hypersphere. In this work, we aim at answering two main questions: 1. Does sharing the parameter space between the multi-modal encoders reduce the modality gap? 2. Can the gap be mitigated by pushing apart the uni-modal embeddings via intra-modality separation? We design AlignCLIP, in order to answer these questions and show that answers to both questions are positive. Through extensive experiments, we show that AlignCLIP achieves noticeable enhancements in the cross-modal alignment of the embeddings, and thereby, reduces the modality gap, while maintaining the performance across several downstream evaluations, such as zero-shot image classification, zero-shot multi-modal retrieval and zero-shot semantic text similarity.
6/27/2024
Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs
Shengbang Tong, Zhuang Liu, Yuexiang Zhai, Yi Ma, Yann LeCun, Saining Xie
0
0
Is vision good enough for language? Recent advancements in multimodal models primarily stem from the powerful reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the visual component typically depends only on the instance-level contrastive language-image pre-training (CLIP). Our research reveals that the visual capabilities in recent multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) still exhibit systematic shortcomings. To understand the roots of these errors, we explore the gap between the visual embedding space of CLIP and vision-only self-supervised learning. We identify ''CLIP-blind pairs'' - images that CLIP perceives as similar despite their clear visual differences. With these pairs, we construct the Multimodal Visual Patterns (MMVP) benchmark. MMVP exposes areas where state-of-the-art systems, including GPT-4V, struggle with straightforward questions across nine basic visual patterns, often providing incorrect answers and hallucinated explanations. We further evaluate various CLIP-based vision-and-language models and found a notable correlation between visual patterns that challenge CLIP models and those problematic for multimodal LLMs. As an initial effort to address these issues, we propose a Mixture of Features (MoF) approach, demonstrating that integrating vision self-supervised learning features with MLLMs can significantly enhance their visual grounding capabilities. Together, our research suggests visual representation learning remains an open challenge, and accurate visual grounding is crucial for future successful multimodal systems.
4/26/2024
Contrasting Intra-Modal and Ranking Cross-Modal Hard Negatives to Enhance Visio-Linguistic Compositional Understanding
Le Zhang, Rabiul Awal, Aishwarya Agrawal
0
0
Vision-Language Models (VLMs), such as CLIP, exhibit strong image-text comprehension abilities, facilitating advances in several downstream tasks such as zero-shot image classification, image-text retrieval, and text-to-image generation. However, the compositional reasoning abilities of existing VLMs remains subpar. The root of this limitation lies in the inadequate alignment between the images and captions in the pretraining datasets. Additionally, the current contrastive learning objective fails to focus on fine-grained grounding components like relations, actions, and attributes, resulting in bag-of-words representations. We introduce a simple and effective method to improve compositional reasoning in VLMs. Our method better leverages available datasets by refining and expanding the standard image-text contrastive learning framework. Our approach does not require specific annotations and does not incur extra parameters. When integrated with CLIP, our technique yields notable improvement over state-of-the-art baselines across five vision-language compositional benchmarks. We open-source our code at https://github.com/lezhang7/Enhance-FineGrained.
4/26/2024