A Two-Stage Algorithm for Cost-Efficient Multi-instance Counterfactual Explanations
2403.01221
0
0
š
Abstract
Counterfactual explanations constitute among the most popular methods for analyzing black-box systems since they can recommend cost-efficient and actionable changes to the input of a system to obtain the desired system output. While most of the existing counterfactual methods explain a single instance, several real-world problems, such as customer satisfaction, require the identification of a single counterfactual that can satisfy multiple instances (e.g. customers) simultaneously. To address this limitation, in this work, we propose a flexible two-stage algorithm for finding groups of instances and computing cost-efficient multi-instance counterfactual explanations. The paper presents the algorithm and its performance against popular alternatives through a comparative evaluation.
Create account to get full access
Overview
ā¢ This paper presents a two-stage algorithm for generating cost-efficient multi-instance counterfactual explanations, which can help users understand how to change the features of an object or situation to achieve a desired outcome. ā¢ The algorithm first identifies a set of candidate counterfactual instances, and then selects the most cost-efficient ones that satisfy certain constraints. ā¢ This approach aims to provide users with a small number of meaningful counterfactual explanations that are easy to interpret and implement.
Plain English Explanation
Counterfactual explanations are a way to help people understand how they could change the features or characteristics of an object or situation to get a different outcome. For example, a counterfactual explanation for why someone was denied a loan could be "If your income was $5,000 higher, you would have been approved."
The paper introduces a two-stage algorithm to generate these kinds of counterfactual explanations in a more efficient and cost-effective way. The first stage identifies a set of potential counterfactual instances, and the second stage selects the most cost-efficient ones that still satisfy certain constraints or requirements.
This approach aims to provide users with a small number of meaningful counterfactual explanations that are easy to understand and implement, rather than overwhelming them with many different options. By focusing on the most cost-effective changes, the algorithm can suggest ways for people to realistically modify the features of an object or situation to achieve their desired outcome.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a two-stage algorithm for generating cost-efficient multi-instance counterfactual explanations. In the first stage, the algorithm identifies a set of candidate counterfactual instances by solving an optimization problem that minimizes the distance between the original instance and the counterfactual, subject to constraints on the desired outcome.
The second stage then selects the most cost-efficient counterfactual instances from the candidate set. This is done by solving another optimization problem that minimizes the total cost of the changes required to achieve the desired outcome, while still satisfying the constraints. The cost function can be defined based on the specific context and preferences of the user.
The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets and compare it to existing methods for generating counterfactual explanations. The results show that their algorithm can produce a small number of high-quality counterfactual explanations that are both effective and efficient in terms of the required changes.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach for generating cost-efficient multi-instance counterfactual explanations. The two-stage algorithm is well-designed and the authors' experiments demonstrate its effectiveness. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The cost function used in the second stage may not capture all relevant factors that users consider when evaluating the feasibility of the suggested changes. The authors acknowledge this and suggest incorporating additional domain-specific constraints or preferences.
-
The approach assumes that the underlying machine learning model is accurate and unbiased. In practice, model errors or biases could lead to suboptimal or even misleading counterfactual explanations. Addressing this issue would require further research on robust and debiased counterfactual explanations.
-
The paper focuses on single-instance counterfactual explanations, but real-world applications may often require multi-instance explanations that consider the interdependencies between multiple objects or situations.
-
The algorithm may not be able to handle complex, high-dimensional feature spaces or non-linear relationships between features and the target outcome. Extending the approach to such scenarios would be an interesting area for future research.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel two-stage algorithm for generating cost-efficient multi-instance counterfactual explanations. By first identifying a set of candidate counterfactual instances and then selecting the most cost-effective ones, the algorithm aims to provide users with a small number of meaningful and actionable explanations.
The authors' experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach, and the paper contributes to the growing body of research on interpretable and explainable AI systems. While the current approach has some limitations, the ideas presented in this paper could be further developed and applied to a wide range of real-world applications where users need to understand how to achieve desired outcomes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
šÆ
Benchmarking Instance-Centric Counterfactual Algorithms for XAI: From White Box to Black Bo
Catarina Moreira, Yu-Liang Chou, Chihcheng Hsieh, Chun Ouyang, Joaquim Jorge, Jo~ao Madeiras Pereira
0
0
This study investigates the impact of machine learning models on the generation of counterfactual explanations by conducting a benchmark evaluation over three different types of models: a decision tree (fully transparent, interpretable, white-box model), a random forest (semi-interpretable, grey-box model), and a neural network (fully opaque, black-box model). We tested the counterfactual generation process using four algorithms (DiCE, WatcherCF, prototype, and GrowingSpheresCF) in the literature in 25 different datasets. Our findings indicate that: (1) Different machine learning models have little impact on the generation of counterfactual explanations; (2) Counterfactual algorithms based uniquely on proximity loss functions are not actionable and will not provide meaningful explanations; (3) One cannot have meaningful evaluation results without guaranteeing plausibility in the counterfactual generation. Algorithms that do not consider plausibility in their internal mechanisms will lead to biased and unreliable conclusions if evaluated with the current state-of-the-art metrics; (4) A counterfactual inspection analysis is strongly recommended to ensure a robust examination of counterfactual explanations and the potential identification of biases.
6/12/2024
GLANCE: Global Actions in a Nutshell for Counterfactual Explainability
Ioannis Emiris, Dimitris Fotakis, Giorgos Giannopoulos, Dimitrios Gunopulos, Loukas Kavouras, Kleopatra Markou, Eleni Psaroudaki, Dimitrios Rontogiannis, Dimitris Sacharidis, Nikolaos Theologitis, Dimitrios Tomaras, Konstantinos Tsopelas
0
0
Counterfactual explanations have emerged as an important tool to understand, debug, and audit complex machine learning models. To offer global counterfactual explainability, state-of-the-art methods construct summaries of local explanations, offering a trade-off among conciseness, counterfactual effectiveness, and counterfactual cost or burden imposed on instances. In this work, we provide a concise formulation of the problem of identifying global counterfactuals and establish principled criteria for comparing solutions, drawing inspiration from Pareto dominance. We introduce innovative algorithms designed to address the challenge of finding global counterfactuals for either the entire input space or specific partitions, employing clustering and decision trees as key components. Additionally, we conduct a comprehensive experimental evaluation, considering various instances of the problem and comparing our proposed algorithms with state-of-the-art methods. The results highlight the consistent capability of our algorithms to generate meaningful and interpretable global counterfactual explanations.
5/30/2024
š
Generating Counterfactual Explanations Using Cardinality Constraints
Rub'en Ruiz-Torrubiano
0
0
Providing explanations about how machine learning algorithms work and/or make particular predictions is one of the main tools that can be used to improve their trusworthiness, fairness and robustness. Among the most intuitive type of explanations are counterfactuals, which are examples that differ from a given point only in the prediction target and some set of features, presenting which features need to be changed in the original example to flip the prediction for that example. However, such counterfactuals can have many different features than the original example, making their interpretation difficult. In this paper, we propose to explicitly add a cardinality constraint to counterfactual generation limiting how many features can be different from the original example, thus providing more interpretable and easily understantable counterfactuals.
4/12/2024
A Framework for Feasible Counterfactual Exploration incorporating Causality, Sparsity and Density
Kleopatra Markou, Dimitrios Tomaras, Vana Kalogeraki, Dimitrios Gunopulos
0
0
The imminent need to interpret the output of a Machine Learning model with counterfactual (CF) explanations - via small perturbations to the input - has been notable in the research community. Although the variety of CF examples is important, the aspect of them being feasible at the same time, does not necessarily apply in their entirety. This work uses different benchmark datasets to examine through the preservation of the logical causal relations of their attributes, whether CF examples can be generated after a small amount of changes to the original input, be feasible and actually useful to the end-user in a real-world case. To achieve this, we used a black box model as a classifier, to distinguish the desired from the input class and a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) to generate feasible CF examples. As an extension, we also extracted two-dimensional manifolds (one for each dataset) that located the majority of the feasible examples, a representation that adequately distinguished them from infeasible ones. For our experimentation we used three commonly used datasets and we managed to generate feasible and at the same time sparse, CF examples that satisfy all possible predefined causal constraints, by confirming their importance with the attributes in a dataset.
4/23/2024