Two-stage Generative Question Answering on Temporal Knowledge Graph Using Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposed a two-stage generative question answering (QA) system for querying temporal knowledge graphs using large language models.
- Designed a question decomposition model to break down complex queries into simpler subqueries, and a query answering model to generate answers from the subqueries.
- Evaluated the system on the TempQuestions dataset, showing improvements over existing methods.
Plain English Explanation
This research paper presents a new approach for answering questions about information stored in temporal knowledge graphs. Temporal knowledge graphs are databases that contain facts along with the time periods when those facts are true.
The key idea is to use large language models - powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data - to tackle this task in two stages:
-
Question Decomposition: The system first breaks down complex questions into simpler subquestions that are easier to answer. For example, if asked "Who was the president of the United States in 2015?", it would split this into two parts: "Who was the president of the United States?" and "When was 2015?".
-
Query Answering: The system then generates answers to each of the subquestions using the information in the temporal knowledge graph. In this case, it would look up the president in office in 2015.
By taking this two-stage approach, the system is able to handle more complex queries that require understanding both the content and the temporal aspects of the knowledge graph. The researchers show that this outperforms previous methods on a standard benchmark dataset.
Technical Explanation
The proposed system consists of two main components:
-
Question Decomposition Model: This is a sequence-to-sequence model that takes a natural language question as input and generates a sequence of simpler subquestions. It is trained on question-subquestion pairs from the dataset.
-
Query Answering Model: This is another sequence-to-sequence model that takes a subquestion and the relevant section of the temporal knowledge graph as input, and generates the answer. It is trained on subquestion-answer pairs.
Both models use large language models like GPT-3 as the backbone, fine-tuning them on the task-specific data.
The system is evaluated on the TempQuestions dataset, which contains questions about events and entities with temporal information. The results show that the two-stage approach outperforms previous methods that directly generate answers from the full question.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a convincing case for the effectiveness of the proposed two-stage system, but there are a few limitations worth noting:
-
Dataset Bias: The TempQuestions dataset may not fully capture the diversity of real-world temporal knowledge graph queries. The system's strong performance on this benchmark may not generalize to other datasets or real-world applications.
-
Interpretability: As with many large language model-based systems, the internal workings of the question decomposition and query answering models are not easily interpretable. This can make it challenging to understand and debug the system's behavior.
-
Scalability: While the two-stage approach helps handle more complex queries, the system still relies on language models that may struggle with scaling to very large knowledge graphs.
Further research could explore ways to address these limitations, such as developing more interpretable temporal reasoning techniques or hybrid approaches that combine language models with other knowledge representation and reasoning methods.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel two-stage generative question answering system for temporal knowledge graphs that leverages the power of large language models. By decomposing complex questions and generating answers in a step-by-step manner, the system demonstrates improved performance over previous methods. While there are some limitations to address, this research represents an important step forward in the field of temporal knowledge graph question answering, with potential applications in areas like enterprise knowledge management and automated reasoning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Two-stage Generative Question Answering on Temporal Knowledge Graph Using Large Language Models
Yifu Gao, Linbo Qiao, Zhigang Kan, Zhihua Wen, Yongquan He, Dongsheng Li
Temporal knowledge graph question answering (TKGQA) poses a significant challenge task, due to the temporal constraints hidden in questions and the answers sought from dynamic structured knowledge. Although large language models (LLMs) have made considerable progress in their reasoning ability over structured data, their application to the TKGQA task is a relatively unexplored area. This paper first proposes a novel generative temporal knowledge graph question answering framework, GenTKGQA, which guides LLMs to answer temporal questions through two phases: Subgraph Retrieval and Answer Generation. First, we exploit LLM's intrinsic knowledge to mine temporal constraints and structural links in the questions without extra training, thus narrowing down the subgraph search space in both temporal and structural dimensions. Next, we design virtual knowledge indicators to fuse the graph neural network signals of the subgraph and the text representations of the LLM in a non-shallow way, which helps the open-source LLM deeply understand the temporal order and structural dependencies among the retrieved facts through instruction tuning. Experimental results on two widely used datasets demonstrate the superiority of our model.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering: A Survey
Miao Su, Zixuan Li, Zhuo Chen, Long Bai, Xiaolong Jin, Jiafeng Guo
Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) has been a long-standing field to answer questions based on knowledge bases. Recently, the evolving dynamics of knowledge have attracted a growing interest in Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA), an emerging task to answer temporal questions. However, this field grapples with ambiguities in defining temporal questions and lacks a systematic categorization of existing methods for TKGQA. In response, this paper provides a thorough survey from two perspectives: the taxonomy of temporal questions and the methodological categorization for TKGQA. Specifically, we first establish a detailed taxonomy of temporal questions engaged in prior studies. Subsequently, we provide a comprehensive review of TKGQA techniques of two categories: semantic parsing-based and TKG embedding-based. Building on this review, the paper outlines potential research directions aimed at advancing the field of TKGQA. This work aims to serve as a comprehensive reference for TKGQA and to stimulate further research.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Exploiting Large Language Models Capabilities for Question Answer-Driven Knowledge Graph Completion Across Static and Temporal Domains
Rui Yang, Jiahao Zhu, Jianping Man, Li Fang, Yi Zhou
Knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to identify missing triples in a knowledge graph (KG). This is typically achieved through tasks such as link prediction and instance completion. However, these methods often focus on either static knowledge graphs (SKGs) or temporal knowledge graphs (TKGs), addressing only within-scope triples. This paper introduces a new generative completion framework called Generative Subgraph-based KGC (GS-KGC). GS-KGC employs a question-answering format to directly generate target entities, addressing the challenge of questions having multiple possible answers. We propose a strategy that extracts subgraphs centered on entities and relationships within the KG, from which negative samples and neighborhood information are separately obtained to address the one-to-many problem. Our method generates negative samples using known facts to facilitate the discovery of new information. Furthermore, we collect and refine neighborhood path data of known entities, providing contextual information to enhance reasoning in large language models (LLMs). Our experiments evaluated the proposed method on four SKGs and two TKGs, achieving state-of-the-art Hits@1 metrics on five datasets. Analysis of the results shows that GS-KGC can discover new triples within existing KGs and generate new facts beyond the closed KG, effectively bridging the gap between closed-world and open-world KGC.
Read more8/21/2024
0
Self-Improvement Programming for Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering
Zhuo Chen, Zhao Zhang, Zixuan Li, Fei Wang, Yutao Zeng, Xiaolong Jin, Yongjun Xu
Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) aims to answer questions with temporal intent over Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGs). The core challenge of this task lies in understanding the complex semantic information regarding multiple types of time constraints (e.g., before, first) in questions. Existing end-to-end methods implicitly model the time constraints by learning time-aware embeddings of questions and candidate answers, which is far from understanding the question comprehensively. Motivated by semantic-parsing-based approaches that explicitly model constraints in questions by generating logical forms with symbolic operators, we design fundamental temporal operators for time constraints and introduce a novel self-improvement Programming method for TKGQA (Prog-TQA). Specifically, Prog-TQA leverages the in-context learning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to understand the combinatory time constraints in the questions and generate corresponding program drafts with a few examples given. Then, it aligns these drafts to TKGs with the linking module and subsequently executes them to generate the answers. To enhance the ability to understand questions, Prog-TQA is further equipped with a self-improvement strategy to effectively bootstrap LLMs using high-quality self-generated drafts. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed Prog-TQA on MultiTQ and CronQuestions datasets, especially in the Hits@1 metric.
Read more4/3/2024