UICrit: Enhancing Automated Design Evaluation with a UICritique Dataset
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces UICrit, a dataset of user interface (UI) critique annotations that can be used to enhance automated design evaluation.
- The dataset contains over 21,000 natural language critiques on 2,600 UI designs from crowdsourced raters.
- The authors demonstrate how UICrit can be used to fine-tune large language models (LLMs) to generate critiques and assess UI designs.
- The work aims to advance the field of AI-inspired UI design by providing a valuable resource for training models to automate and augment the UI design process.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new dataset called UICrit that contains many human-written critiques of user interface (UI) designs. The critiques were collected from crowdsourced workers who reviewed thousands of example UI designs and provided feedback on what they liked or didn't like about each one.
By having this large dataset of real critiques, the researchers can use it to train large language models to automatically generate critique text for new UI designs. This allows the models to mimic the kind of feedback a human expert UI designer might provide.
The goal is to create AI systems that can assess UI designs in an automated way, similar to how a human UI designer would review and critique a new design. This could help speed up the UI design process and provide valuable feedback early on.
The UICrit dataset represents an important step forward in the field of AI-inspired UI design, where AI is used to augment and enhance human design capabilities. By having a large corpus of real critique data, researchers can develop more advanced AI models to analyze and provide feedback on UI designs.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the UICrit dataset, which contains over 21,000 natural language critiques on 2,600 UI designs from crowdsourced raters. The critiques cover a wide range of UI elements and design aspects, such as layout, color, typography, and usability.
To create the dataset, the authors recruited crowdsourced workers to review UI designs and provide feedback in the form of free-text critiques. The workers were instructed to provide both positive and negative feedback, and the authors curated the critiques to ensure high quality.
The authors demonstrate how UICrit can be used to fine-tune large language models (LLMs) to generate critiques and assess UI designs. Specifically, they fine-tune a GPT-3 model on the UICrit dataset and show that the fine-tuned model can generate critiques that are comparable to human-written ones.
Additionally, the authors present a data-driven model for assessing UI designs using the UICrit dataset. This model leverages the critiques to learn a representation of UI design quality, which can then be used to evaluate new UI designs.
The UICrit dataset and the associated models represent a significant advancement in the field of AI-inspired UI design, where AI is used to enhance and automate the design process. The availability of a large corpus of real critique data, coupled with the ability to generate and assess UI designs using AI, has the potential to revolutionize the way UI design is approached.
Critical Analysis
The UICrit dataset and the associated models presented in this paper are a valuable contribution to the field of AI-inspired UI design. The dataset provides a rich source of critique data that can be used to train more advanced AI models for UI design assessment and feedback generation.
One potential limitation of the dataset is the diversity of the UI designs it covers. While the dataset includes a large number of designs, they may not be representative of the full range of UI styles and use cases. Additionally, the critiques may be biased towards the preferences of the crowdsourced workers who provided the feedback.
The authors acknowledge these limitations and suggest that future work could focus on expanding the dataset to include a more diverse set of UI designs and critiques from a wider range of sources, such as professional UI designers.
Another potential area for further research is the development of more sophisticated models for generating and assessing UI critiques. The authors demonstrate the use of fine-tuned LLMs, but there may be opportunities to explore other AI architectures or techniques, such as reinforcement learning or multi-task learning, to further improve the performance of these models.
Overall, the UICrit dataset and the associated research presented in this paper represent an important step forward in the field of AI-inspired UI design. By providing a valuable resource for training AI models and demonstrating their potential applications, the authors have laid the groundwork for further advancements in this rapidly evolving field.
Conclusion
The UICrit dataset and the associated research presented in this paper represent a significant contribution to the field of AI-inspired UI design. By providing a large corpus of real UI critique data, the authors have enabled the development of advanced AI models that can generate and assess UI designs in an automated way.
The UICrit dataset and the associated models have the potential to revolutionize the UI design process by augmenting and enhancing the capabilities of human designers. This could lead to faster design iterations, more consistent feedback, and ultimately, better-designed user interfaces.
The research presented in this paper also highlights the growing importance of AI-based approaches in the field of UI design, and the authors' work represents an important step forward in this rapidly evolving field. As the field of AI-inspired UI design continues to advance, the UICrit dataset and the associated models are likely to become increasingly valuable resources for researchers and practitioners alike.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
UICrit: Enhancing Automated Design Evaluation with a UICritique Dataset
Peitong Duan, Chin-yi Chen, Gang Li, Bjoern Hartmann, Yang Li
Automated UI evaluation can be beneficial for the design process; for example, to compare different UI designs, or conduct automated heuristic evaluation. LLM-based UI evaluation, in particular, holds the promise of generalizability to a wide variety of UI types and evaluation tasks. However, current LLM-based techniques do not yet match the performance of human evaluators. We hypothesize that automatic evaluation can be improved by collecting a targeted UI feedback dataset and then using this dataset to enhance the performance of general-purpose LLMs. We present a targeted dataset of 3,059 design critiques and quality ratings for 983 mobile UIs, collected from seven experienced designers. We carried out an in-depth analysis to characterize the dataset's features. We then applied this dataset to achieve a 55% performance gain in LLM-generated UI feedback via various few-shot and visual prompting techniques. We also discuss future applications of this dataset, including training a reward model for generative UI techniques, and fine-tuning a tool-agnostic multi-modal LLM that automates UI evaluation.
Read more8/15/2024
0
UIClip: A Data-driven Model for Assessing User Interface Design
Jason Wu, Yi-Hao Peng, Amanda Li, Amanda Swearngin, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Jeffrey Nichols
User interface (UI) design is a difficult yet important task for ensuring the usability, accessibility, and aesthetic qualities of applications. In our paper, we develop a machine-learned model, UIClip, for assessing the design quality and visual relevance of a UI given its screenshot and natural language description. To train UIClip, we used a combination of automated crawling, synthetic augmentation, and human ratings to construct a large-scale dataset of UIs, collated by description and ranked by design quality. Through training on the dataset, UIClip implicitly learns properties of good and bad designs by i) assigning a numerical score that represents a UI design's relevance and quality and ii) providing design suggestions. In an evaluation that compared the outputs of UIClip and other baselines to UIs rated by 12 human designers, we found that UIClip achieved the highest agreement with ground-truth rankings. Finally, we present three example applications that demonstrate how UIClip can facilitate downstream applications that rely on instantaneous assessment of UI design quality: i) UI code generation, ii) UI design tips generation, and iii) quality-aware UI example search.
Read more4/24/2024
0
UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedback
Jason Wu, Eldon Schoop, Alan Leung, Titus Barik, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Jeffrey Nichols
Large language models (LLMs) struggle to consistently generate UI code that compiles and produces visually relevant designs. Existing approaches to improve generation rely on expensive human feedback or distilling a proprietary model. In this paper, we explore the use of automated feedback (compilers and multi-modal models) to guide LLMs to generate high-quality UI code. Our method starts with an existing LLM and iteratively produces improved models by self-generating a large synthetic dataset using an original model, applying automated tools to aggressively filter, score, and de-duplicate the data into a refined higher quality dataset. The original LLM is improved by finetuning on this refined dataset. We applied our approach to several open-source LLMs and compared the resulting performance to baseline models with both automated metrics and human preferences. Our evaluation shows the resulting models outperform all other downloadable baselines and approach the performance of larger proprietary models.
Read more6/13/2024
📊
0
MUD: Towards a Large-Scale and Noise-Filtered UI Dataset for Modern Style UI Modeling
Sidong Feng, Suyu Ma, Han Wang, David Kong, Chunyang Chen
The importance of computational modeling of mobile user interfaces (UIs) is undeniable. However, these require a high-quality UI dataset. Existing datasets are often outdated, collected years ago, and are frequently noisy with mismatches in their visual representation. This presents challenges in modeling UI understanding in the wild. This paper introduces a novel approach to automatically mine UI data from Android apps, leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to mimic human-like exploration. To ensure dataset quality, we employ the best practices in UI noise filtering and incorporate human annotation as a final validation step. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of LLMs-enhanced app exploration in mining more meaningful UIs, resulting in a large dataset MUD of 18k human-annotated UIs from 3.3k apps. We highlight the usefulness of MUD in two common UI modeling tasks: element detection and UI retrieval, showcasing its potential to establish a foundation for future research into high-quality, modern UIs.
Read more5/14/2024