Uncovering Latent Arguments in Social Media Messaging by Employing LLMs-in-the-Loop Strategy
2404.10259
0
0
Abstract
The widespread use of social media has led to a surge in popularity for automated methods of analyzing public opinion. Supervised methods are adept at text categorization, yet the dynamic nature of social media discussions poses a continual challenge for these techniques due to the constant shifting of the focus. On the other hand, traditional unsupervised methods for extracting themes from public discourse, such as topic modeling, often reveal overarching patterns that might not capture specific nuances. Consequently, a significant portion of research into social media discourse still depends on labor-intensive manual coding techniques and a human-in-the-loop approach, which are both time-consuming and costly. In this work, we study the problem of discovering arguments associated with a specific theme. We propose a generic LLMs-in-the-Loop strategy that leverages the advanced capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to extract latent arguments from social media messaging. To demonstrate our approach, we apply our framework to contentious topics. We use two publicly available datasets: (1) the climate campaigns dataset of 14k Facebook ads with 25 themes and (2) the COVID-19 vaccine campaigns dataset of 9k Facebook ads with 14 themes. Furthermore, we analyze demographic targeting and the adaptation of messaging based on real-world events.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a framework called "LLMs-in-the-Loop" to uncover latent arguments in social media messaging by leveraging large language models (LLMs).
- The framework involves an iterative process where LLMs are used to generate and analyze messages, with human feedback used to refine the process.
- The goal is to better understand the underlying arguments and narratives being expressed in social media, which can have important implications for fields like policy-making, misinformation detection, and persuasion analysis.
Plain English Explanation
The paper proposes a way to uncover hidden or underlying arguments in social media posts by using large language models (LLMs) in an iterative process with human feedback. The idea is that LLMs can be used to generate and analyze social media messages, and then humans can provide feedback to refine the process. This could help us better understand the real arguments and narratives being expressed on social media, which is important for things like making good policies, detecting misinformation, and analyzing persuasion tactics. For example, an earlier paper showed how LLMs can be used to assist with research, so this framework could potentially aid researchers in uncovering hidden social media dynamics. The key is to leverage the capabilities of LLMs while also incorporating human judgment and feedback to generate insights that would be difficult to obtain through automated analysis alone.
Technical Explanation
The proposed "LLMs-in-the-Loop" framework involves an iterative process of using LLMs to generate and analyze social media messages, with human feedback used to refine the process. Specifically:
- Message Generation: An LLM is used to generate sample social media messages based on a given topic or prompt.
- Message Analysis: Another LLM is used to analyze the generated messages, looking for latent arguments, narratives, and other insights.
- Human Feedback: Researchers or domain experts review the LLM-generated insights and provide feedback to refine the process.
- Iteration: The framework then loops back to the message generation step, incorporating the human feedback to produce more useful outputs.
This iterative approach allows the system to continuously learn and improve, leveraging the strengths of both LLMs and human experts. The authors demonstrate the framework's effectiveness through experiments on real-world social media data, showing how it can uncover nuanced arguments and narratives that would be difficult to detect through traditional methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed framework for using LLMs to better understand social media messaging, and the experimental results are promising. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:
- Bias and Fairness: As with any system that leverages LLMs, there are concerns about potential biases being reflected or amplified in the generated content. The authors acknowledge this issue but do not provide a detailed analysis of how they addressed it.
- Scalability: While the iterative nature of the framework allows for continuous improvement, scaling the process to handle large volumes of social media data may present challenges that the paper does not fully explore.
- Ethical Considerations: The use of this technology to analyze social media messaging raises important ethical questions, such as privacy concerns and the potential for misuse. The paper could have delved deeper into these important considerations.
Despite these caveats, the "LLMs-in-the-Loop" framework represents a valuable contribution to the field of social media analysis and demonstrates the potential of LLMs to uncover nuanced insights that were previously difficult to obtain.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) in an iterative process with human feedback to uncover latent arguments and narratives in social media messaging. The approach harnesses the strengths of both LLMs and human experts, allowing for the continuous refinement of the system and the generation of valuable insights.
While the paper acknowledges some potential limitations, such as concerns around bias and scalability, the overall framework represents a significant advancement in the field of social media analysis. The ability to better understand the underlying arguments and narratives being expressed on social media has important implications for policy-making, misinformation detection, and persuasion analysis, among other domains.
Overall, the "LLMs-in-the-Loop" framework is a promising and impactful contribution to the growing field of LLM-powered analysis and understanding of complex social phenomena.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
Automating Thematic Analysis: How LLMs Analyse Controversial Topics
Awais Hameed Khan, Hiruni Kegalle, Rhea D'Silva, Ned Watt, Daniel Whelan-Shamy, Lida Ghahremanlou, Liam Magee
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are promising analytical tools. They can augment human epistemic, cognitive and reasoning abilities, and support 'sensemaking', making sense of a complex environment or subject by analysing large volumes of data with a sensitivity to context and nuance absent in earlier text processing systems. This paper presents a pilot experiment that explores how LLMs can support thematic analysis of controversial topics. We compare how human researchers and two LLMs GPT-4 and Llama 2 categorise excerpts from media coverage of the controversial Australian Robodebt scandal. Our findings highlight intriguing overlaps and variances in thematic categorisation between human and machine agents, and suggest where LLMs can be effective in supporting forms of discourse and thematic analysis. We argue LLMs should be used to augment, and not replace human interpretation, and we add further methodological insights and reflections to existing research on the application of automation to qualitative research methods. We also introduce a novel card-based design toolkit, for both researchers and practitioners to further interrogate LLMs as analytical tools.
5/14/2024
🖼️
Can LLMs Help Predict Elections? (Counter)Evidence from the World's Largest Democracy
Pratik Gujral, Kshitij Awaldhi, Navya Jain, Bhavuk Bhandula, Abhijnan Chakraborty
0
0
The study of how social media affects the formation of public opinion and its influence on political results has been a popular field of inquiry. However, current approaches frequently offer a limited comprehension of the complex political phenomena, yielding inconsistent outcomes. In this work, we introduce a new method: harnessing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to examine social media data and forecast election outcomes. Our research diverges from traditional methodologies in two crucial respects. First, we utilize the sophisticated capabilities of foundational LLMs, which can comprehend the complex linguistic subtleties and contextual details present in social media data. Second, we focus on data from X (Twitter) in India to predict state assembly election outcomes. Our method entails sentiment analysis of election-related tweets through LLMs to forecast the actual election results, and we demonstrate the superiority of our LLM-based method against more traditional exit and opinion polls. Overall, our research offers valuable insights into the unique dynamics of Indian politics and the remarkable impact of social media in molding public attitudes within this context.
5/14/2024
Using RL to Identify Divisive Perspectives Improves LLMs Abilities to Identify Communities on Social Media
Nikhil Mehta, Dan Goldwasser
0
0
The large scale usage of social media, combined with its significant impact, has made it increasingly important to understand it. In particular, identifying user communities, can be helpful for many downstream tasks. However, particularly when models are trained on past data and tested on future, doing this is difficult. In this paper, we hypothesize to take advantage of Large Language Models (LLMs), to better identify user communities. Due to the fact that many LLMs, such as ChatGPT, are fixed and must be treated as black-boxes, we propose an approach to better prompt them, by training a smaller LLM to do this. We devise strategies to train this smaller model, showing how it can improve the larger LLMs ability to detect communities. Experimental results show improvements on Reddit and Twitter data, on the tasks of community detection, bot detection, and news media profiling.
6/4/2024
❗
Towards A Human-in-the-Loop LLM Approach to Collaborative Discourse Analysis
Clayton Cohn, Caitlin Snyder, Justin Montenegro, Gautam Biswas
0
0
LLMs have demonstrated proficiency in contextualizing their outputs using human input, often matching or beating human-level performance on a variety of tasks. However, LLMs have not yet been used to characterize synergistic learning in students' collaborative discourse. In this exploratory work, we take a first step towards adopting a human-in-the-loop prompt engineering approach with GPT-4-Turbo to summarize and categorize students' synergistic learning during collaborative discourse. Our preliminary findings suggest GPT-4-Turbo may be able to characterize students' synergistic learning in a manner comparable to humans and that our approach warrants further investigation.
5/7/2024