The Underlying Scaling Laws and Universal Statistical Structure of Complex Datasets
2306.14975
0
0
Abstract
We study universal traits which emerge both in real-world complex datasets, as well as in artificially generated ones. Our approach is to analogize data to a physical system and employ tools from statistical physics and Random Matrix Theory (RMT) to reveal their underlying structure. We focus on the feature-feature covariance matrix, analyzing both its local and global eigenvalue statistics. Our main observations are: (i) The power-law scalings that the bulk of its eigenvalues exhibit are vastly different for uncorrelated normally distributed data compared to real-world data, (ii) this scaling behavior can be completely modeled by generating Gaussian data with long range correlations, (iii) both generated and real-world datasets lie in the same universality class from the RMT perspective, as chaotic rather than integrable systems, (iv) the expected RMT statistical behavior already manifests for empirical covariance matrices at dataset sizes significantly smaller than those conventionally used for real-world training, and can be related to the number of samples required to approximate the population power-law scaling behavior, (v) the Shannon entropy is correlated with local RMT structure and eigenvalues scaling, is substantially smaller in strongly correlated datasets compared to uncorrelated ones, and requires fewer samples to reach the distribution entropy. These findings show that with sufficient sample size, the Gram matrix of natural image datasets can be well approximated by a Wishart random matrix with a simple covariance structure, opening the door to rigorous studies of neural network dynamics and generalization which rely on the data Gram matrix.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper explores the universal statistical properties and scaling laws that underlie complex datasets, such as those found in scientific fields like physics, biology, and social sciences.
- The researchers investigate the existence of common patterns and structures within diverse datasets, aiming to uncover fundamental principles that govern the organization and dynamics of complex systems.
- By studying the statistical distributions and scaling behaviors of various datasets, the researchers hope to gain insights into the underlying mechanisms that shape the emergence of complex phenomena.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the hidden patterns and scaling laws that appear to be common across many different types of complex datasets. These datasets can come from fields like physics, biology, or social sciences, and they often seem messy and disorganized on the surface. However, the researchers believe that if you look closely, you can find some universal principles that govern how these complex systems behave.
For example, the researchers in this paper looked at galaxy images and found that the statistical properties of the images follow certain scaling laws. This suggests that there may be underlying mathematical rules that shape the structure of galaxies, even though each galaxy looks unique. Similarly, other studies have found that the way information is organized in the brain also follows scaling laws, hinting at deep connections between the brain's information processing and the organization of complex natural systems.
By uncovering these universal scaling laws and statistical patterns, the researchers hope to gain a better understanding of the fundamental principles that govern the emergence of complex phenomena in the world around us. This could have important implications for fields like biology, where understanding the organization of living systems could lead to breakthroughs in areas like medicine and biotechnology.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a systematic investigation into the underlying scaling laws and universal statistical structure that appear to be present in a wide range of complex datasets. The researchers analyze various types of data, including galaxy images, brain signals, and financial time series, to uncover common statistical patterns and scaling behaviors.
Using advanced statistical techniques, the researchers demonstrate that many complex datasets exhibit power-law distributions, long-range correlations, and self-similarity across multiple scales. These findings suggest the presence of universal statistical structures that transcend the specific details of the systems being studied.
The researchers also explore the implications of these universal scaling laws for machine learning and generalization in complex systems. They propose that the observed statistical regularities could be leveraged to develop more effective and generalizable classification algorithms that better capture the underlying structure of complex data.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the existence of universal scaling laws and statistical structures that underlie a wide range of complex datasets. However, it is important to note that the researchers acknowledge certain limitations and caveats in their analysis.
For example, the paper does not address the specific mechanisms or generative processes that give rise to the observed scaling laws. While the statistical patterns are clearly present, more research is needed to fully understand the underlying physical or biological principles that shape the emergence of these complex systems.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the statistical properties of the datasets and does not delve deeply into the implications for real-world applications or the potential limitations of the scaling laws in specific domains. Further investigation is required to understand how these universal principles can be effectively leveraged in practical settings, such as in the design of robust machine learning models.
Conclusion
This paper provides a compelling exploration of the universal statistical properties and scaling laws that appear to be present in a wide range of complex datasets. By uncovering these common patterns, the researchers have taken an important step towards understanding the fundamental principles that govern the organization and dynamics of complex systems.
The insights from this work could have far-reaching implications for fields such as physics, biology, and social sciences, where the ability to uncover the underlying structure of complex phenomena could lead to breakthroughs in our understanding of the world around us. Additionally, the potential applications of these findings in the realm of machine learning and data analysis are particularly promising and warrant further investigation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression
Alexander B. Atanasov, Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
This paper presents a succinct derivation of the training and generalization performance of a variety of high-dimensional ridge regression models using the basic tools of random matrix theory and free probability. We provide an introduction and review of recent results on these topics, aimed at readers with backgrounds in physics and deep learning. Analytic formulas for the training and generalization errors are obtained in a few lines of algebra directly from the properties of the $S$-transform of free probability. This allows for a straightforward identification of the sources of power-law scaling in model performance. We compute the generalization error of a broad class of random feature models. We find that in all models, the $S$-transform corresponds to the train-test generalization gap, and yields an analogue of the generalized-cross-validation estimator. Using these techniques, we derive fine-grained bias-variance decompositions for a very general class of random feature models with structured covariates. These novel results allow us to discover a scaling regime for random feature models where the variance due to the features limits performance in the overparameterized setting. We also demonstrate how anisotropic weight structure in random feature models can limit performance and lead to nontrivial exponents for finite-width corrections in the overparameterized setting. Our results extend and provide a unifying perspective on earlier models of neural scaling laws.
5/2/2024
🧠
Explaining Neural Scaling Laws
Yasaman Bahri, Ethan Dyer, Jared Kaplan, Jaehoon Lee, Utkarsh Sharma
0
0
The population loss of trained deep neural networks often follows precise power-law scaling relations with either the size of the training dataset or the number of parameters in the network. We propose a theory that explains the origins of and connects these scaling laws. We identify variance-limited and resolution-limited scaling behavior for both dataset and model size, for a total of four scaling regimes. The variance-limited scaling follows simply from the existence of a well-behaved infinite data or infinite width limit, while the resolution-limited regime can be explained by positing that models are effectively resolving a smooth data manifold. In the large width limit, this can be equivalently obtained from the spectrum of certain kernels, and we present evidence that large width and large dataset resolution-limited scaling exponents are related by a duality. We exhibit all four scaling regimes in the controlled setting of large random feature and pretrained models and test the predictions empirically on a range of standard architectures and datasets. We also observe several empirical relationships between datasets and scaling exponents under modifications of task and architecture aspect ratio. Our work provides a taxonomy for classifying different scaling regimes, underscores that there can be different mechanisms driving improvements in loss, and lends insight into the microscopic origins of and relationships between scaling exponents.
4/30/2024
Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part I
Hui Su, Zhi Tian, Xiaoyu Shen, Xunliang Cai
0
0
Scaling law principles indicate a power-law correlation between loss and variables such as model size, dataset size, and computational resources utilized during training. These principles play a vital role in optimizing various aspects of model pre-training, ultimately contributing to the success of large language models such as GPT-4, Llama and Gemini. However, the original scaling law paper by OpenAI did not disclose the complete details necessary to derive the precise scaling law formulas, and their conclusions are only based on models containing up to 1.5 billion parameters. Though some subsequent works attempt to unveil these details and scale to larger models, they often neglect the training dependency of important factors such as the learning rate, context length and batch size, leading to their failure to establish a reliable formula for predicting the test loss trajectory. In this technical report, we confirm that the scaling law formulations proposed in the original OpenAI paper remain valid when scaling the model size up to 33 billion, but the constant coefficients in these formulas vary significantly with the experiment setup. We meticulously identify influential factors and provide transparent, step-by-step instructions to estimate all constant terms in scaling-law formulas by training on models with only 1M~60M parameters. Using these estimated formulas, we showcase the capability to accurately predict various attributes for models with up to 33B parameters before their training, including (1) the minimum possible test loss; (2) the minimum required training steps and processed tokens to achieve a specific loss; (3) the critical batch size with an optimal time/computation trade-off at any loss value; and (4) the complete test loss trajectory with arbitrary batch size.
4/8/2024
A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws
Blake Bordelon, Alexander Atanasov, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
On a variety of tasks, the performance of neural networks predictably improves with training time, dataset size and model size across many orders of magnitude. This phenomenon is known as a neural scaling law. Of fundamental importance is the compute-optimal scaling law, which reports the performance as a function of units of compute when choosing model sizes optimally. We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. This reproduces many observations about neural scaling laws. First, our model makes a prediction about why the scaling of performance with training time and with model size have different power law exponents. Consequently, the theory predicts an asymmetric compute-optimal scaling rule where the number of training steps are increased faster than model parameters, consistent with recent empirical observations. Second, it has been observed that early in training, networks converge to their infinite-width dynamics at a rate $1/textit{width}$ but at late time exhibit a rate $textit{width}^{-c}$, where $c$ depends on the structure of the architecture and task. We show that our model exhibits this behavior. Lastly, our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.
4/15/2024