Understanding Epistemic Language with a Bayesian Theory of Mind
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how language models can learn to understand epistemic language, or language that expresses uncertainty, beliefs, and reasoning about the mental states of others.
- The researchers develop a Bayesian theory of mind model that allows language models to better interpret and generate epistemic language.
- Key findings include that the Bayesian model improves performance on tasks like metaphor understanding and handling linguistic uncertainty compared to standard language models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how AI language models can be designed to better understand language that expresses uncertainty, beliefs, and reasoning about what other people are thinking. The researchers develop a Bayesian theory of mind model that allows language models to more accurately interpret and generate this type of epistemic language.
Epistemic language is used to convey one's level of confidence or uncertainty about something. For example, saying "I think it might rain today" expresses less certainty than "It will definitely rain today." The Bayesian theory of mind model helps the language model understand linguistic uncertainty and [object Object].
The researchers find that this Bayesian approach leads to improved performance on tasks like metaphor understanding and handling linguistic uncertainty, compared to standard language models that don't have this theory of mind capability. This suggests that equipping AI systems with a better understanding of human reasoning and beliefs can make them more effective at natural language processing and generation.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the development of a Bayesian theory of mind model that allows language models to better interpret and generate epistemic language. This model is based on the idea that humans have an intuitive understanding of the mental states of others, which allows us to reason about their beliefs, desires, and intentions.
The researchers incorporate this theory of mind capability into a language model by training it to make inferences about the precursory perceptions and beliefs that could lead to specific linguistic expressions. This allows the model to better understand the underlying meaning and uncertainty conveyed by epistemic language.
In experiments, the Bayesian theory of mind model outperformed standard language models on tasks like metaphor understanding and handling linguistic uncertainty. This suggests that equipping AI systems with a more sophisticated theory of human reasoning and beliefs can lead to significant performance gains on natural language processing and generation tasks that involve epistemic language.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their Bayesian theory of mind model is a simplification of the complex human cognitive processes involved in reasoning about beliefs and mental states. There may be additional factors and mechanisms not captured by their model that are also important for true natural language understanding.
Additionally, the experiments in the paper are relatively narrow in scope, focusing on specific tasks like metaphor understanding and linguistic uncertainty. More research is needed to fully evaluate the broader applicability and limitations of the Bayesian theory of mind approach across a wider range of language understanding and generation scenarios.
It would also be valuable to explore how this type of theory of mind capability could be incorporated into more general-purpose language models, rather than being a specialized add-on. Integrating theory of mind reasoning more deeply into the core language modeling architecture may lead to even greater performance improvements.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for enabling language models to better understand and generate epistemic language by incorporating a Bayesian theory of mind. The findings suggest that equipping AI systems with the ability to reason about the beliefs and mental states of others can lead to significant improvements in natural language processing and generation tasks that involve uncertainty, beliefs, and reasoning about the minds of humans.
While the current model is a simplification, the research demonstrates the potential value of theory of mind capabilities for advancing the state of the art in natural language AI. Continued exploration of this direction could yield important insights and innovations for building more human-like language understanding and generation systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding Epistemic Language with a Bayesian Theory of Mind
Lance Ying, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Lionel Wong, Vikash Mansinghka, Joshua B. Tenenbaum
How do people understand and evaluate claims about others' beliefs, even though these beliefs cannot be directly observed? In this paper, we introduce a cognitive model of epistemic language interpretation, grounded in Bayesian inferences about other agents' goals, beliefs, and intentions: a language-augmented Bayesian theory-of-mind (LaBToM). By translating natural language into an epistemic ``language-of-thought'', then evaluating these translations against the inferences produced by inverting a probabilistic generative model of rational action and perception, LaBToM captures graded plausibility judgments about epistemic claims. We validate our model in an experiment where participants watch an agent navigate a maze to find keys hidden in boxes needed to reach their goal, then rate sentences about the agent's beliefs. In contrast with multimodal LLMs (GPT-4o, Gemini Pro) and ablated models, our model correlates highly with human judgments for a wide range of expressions, including modal language, uncertainty expressions, knowledge claims, likelihood comparisons, and attributions of false belief.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Grounding Language about Belief in a Bayesian Theory-of-Mind
Lance Ying, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Lionel Wong, Vikash Mansinghka, Joshua Tenenbaum
Despite the fact that beliefs are mental states that cannot be directly observed, humans talk about each others' beliefs on a regular basis, often using rich compositional language to describe what others think and know. What explains this capacity to interpret the hidden epistemic content of other minds? In this paper, we take a step towards an answer by grounding the semantics of belief statements in a Bayesian theory-of-mind: By modeling how humans jointly infer coherent sets of goals, beliefs, and plans that explain an agent's actions, then evaluating statements about the agent's beliefs against these inferences via epistemic logic, our framework provides a conceptual role semantics for belief, explaining the gradedness and compositionality of human belief attributions, as well as their intimate connection with goals and plans. We evaluate this framework by studying how humans attribute goals and beliefs while watching an agent solve a doors-and-keys gridworld puzzle that requires instrumental reasoning about hidden objects. In contrast to pure logical deduction, non-mentalizing baselines, and mentalizing that ignores the role of instrumental plans, our model provides a much better fit to human goal and belief attributions, demonstrating the importance of theory-of-mind for a semantics of belief.
Read more7/10/2024
0
Language Models Represent Beliefs of Self and Others
Wentao Zhu, Zhining Zhang, Yizhou Wang
Understanding and attributing mental states, known as Theory of Mind (ToM), emerges as a fundamental capability for human social reasoning. While Large Language Models (LLMs) appear to possess certain ToM abilities, the mechanisms underlying these capabilities remain elusive. In this study, we discover that it is possible to linearly decode the belief status from the perspectives of various agents through neural activations of language models, indicating the existence of internal representations of self and others' beliefs. By manipulating these representations, we observe dramatic changes in the models' ToM performance, underscoring their pivotal role in the social reasoning process. Additionally, our findings extend to diverse social reasoning tasks that involve different causal inference patterns, suggesting the potential generalizability of these representations.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Perceptions to Beliefs: Exploring Precursory Inferences for Theory of Mind in Large Language Models
Chani Jung, Dongkwan Kim, Jiho Jin, Jiseon Kim, Yeon Seonwoo, Yejin Choi, Alice Oh, Hyunwoo Kim
While humans naturally develop theory of mind (ToM), the capability to understand other people's mental states and beliefs, state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) underperform on simple ToM benchmarks. We posit that we can extend our understanding of LLMs' ToM abilities by evaluating key human ToM precursors -- perception inference and perception-to-belief inference -- in LLMs. We introduce two datasets, Percept-ToMi and Percept-FANToM, to evaluate these precursory inferences for ToM in LLMs by annotating characters' perceptions on ToMi and FANToM, respectively. Our evaluation of eight state-of-the-art LLMs reveals that the models generally perform well in perception inference while exhibiting limited capability in perception-to-belief inference (e.g., lack of inhibitory control). Based on these results, we present PercepToM, a novel ToM method leveraging LLMs' strong perception inference capability while supplementing their limited perception-to-belief inference. Experimental results demonstrate that PercepToM significantly enhances LLM's performance, especially in false belief scenarios.
Read more7/10/2024