Understanding Expressivity of GNN in Rule Learning
2303.12306
0
0
🤔
Abstract
Rule learning is critical to improving knowledge graph (KG) reasoning due to their ability to provide logical and interpretable explanations. Recently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with tail entity scoring achieve the state-of-the-art performance on KG reasoning. However, the theoretical understandings for these GNNs are either lacking or focusing on single-relational graphs, leaving what the kind of rules these GNNs can learn an open problem. We propose to fill the above gap in this paper. Specifically, GNNs with tail entity scoring are unified into a common framework. Then, we analyze their expressivity by formally describing the rule structures they can learn and theoretically demonstrating their superiority. These results further inspire us to propose a novel labeling strategy to learn more rules in KG reasoning. Experimental results are consistent with our theoretical findings and verify the effectiveness of our proposed method. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/LARS-research/Rule-learning-expressivity.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper focuses on improving knowledge graph (KG) reasoning using rule learning, which can provide logical and interpretable explanations.
- Recent Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with tail entity scoring achieve state-of-the-art performance on KG reasoning, but the theoretical understanding of the rules these GNNs can learn is unclear.
- The paper aims to address this gap by unifying GNNs with tail entity scoring into a common framework, analyzing their expressivity, and proposing a novel labeling strategy to learn more rules.
Plain English Explanation
Knowledge graphs are digital representations of information that can be used for various reasoning tasks. Rule learning is critical to improving knowledge graph (KG) reasoning due to their ability to provide logical and interpretable explanations. Recently, a type of artificial intelligence called Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with tail entity scoring have achieved the best performance on KG reasoning tasks. However, it's not fully understood what kind of rules these GNNs can actually learn.
The researchers in this paper wanted to address this gap in understanding. They first unified the different GNNs with tail entity scoring into a common framework. Then, they analyzed the types of rules these GNNs can learn and showed that they are more powerful than previous methods. These insights then inspired the researchers to propose a new way of labeling data to help these GNNs learn even more rules.
The researchers tested their methods and found that the results matched their theoretical predictions. Overall, this work helps us better understand the capabilities and limitations of these powerful GNN models for knowledge graph reasoning.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by unifying various Graph Neural Network (GNN) models with tail entity scoring into a common framework. This allows the researchers to analyze the expressivity of these models - in other words, what kinds of rules they are capable of learning.
Through a formal analysis, the researchers demonstrate that these GNN models can learn a broad class of rules, going beyond what previous methods could achieve. Specifically, the GNNs can learn rules that involve multiple relations and capture complex logical structures, such as conjunctions and implications.
Inspired by these theoretical insights, the researchers propose a novel labeling strategy to help the GNNs learn even more rules during knowledge graph reasoning. This strategy involves adding new auxiliary labels to the data, which guide the models to discover additional rule-like patterns.
The experimental results presented in the paper validate the researchers' theoretical findings. The GNN models with the proposed labeling strategy are shown to outperform previous state-of-the-art methods on standard knowledge graph reasoning benchmarks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of Graph Neural Networks for knowledge graph reasoning. The theoretical analysis of the expressivity of these models is a notable strength, as it helps clarify their capabilities and limitations.
One potential limitation of the work is that the theoretical analysis is focused on a specific class of GNN models with tail entity scoring. While this is an important and widely-used family of models, it would be interesting to see if the insights extend to other GNN architectures or reasoning approaches, such as linear recurrent neural networks for regular language reasoning.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the interpretability and transparency of the learned rules. While the authors mention that rule learning can provide logical and interpretable explanations, it would be valuable to further explore how the GNNs' learned rules can be inspected and understood by human users.
Conclusion
This paper makes significant strides in understanding the rule learning capabilities of Graph Neural Networks for knowledge graph reasoning. By unifying various GNN models with tail entity scoring and analyzing their expressivity, the researchers have demonstrated the impressive ability of these models to learn complex logical rules.
The proposed labeling strategy further enhances the rule learning capabilities of the GNNs, leading to improved performance on standard benchmarks. These findings have important implications for developing more transparent and explainable AI systems for knowledge graph reasoning, which is a crucial area of research in the field of artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
On GNN explanability with activation rules
Luca Veyrin-Forrer, Ataollah Kamal, Stefan Duffner, Marc Plantevit, C'eline Robardet
0
0
GNNs are powerful models based on node representation learning that perform particularly well in many machine learning problems related to graphs. The major obstacle to the deployment of GNNs is mostly a problem of societal acceptability and trustworthiness, properties which require making explicit the internal functioning of such models. Here, we propose to mine activation rules in the hidden layers to understand how the GNNs perceive the world. The problem is not to discover activation rules that are individually highly discriminating for an output of the model. Instead, the challenge is to provide a small set of rules that cover all input graphs. To this end, we introduce the subjective activation pattern domain. We define an effective and principled algorithm to enumerate activations rules in each hidden layer. The proposed approach for quantifying the interest of these rules is rooted in information theory and is able to account for background knowledge on the input graph data. The activation rules can then be redescribed thanks to pattern languages involving interpretable features. We show that the activation rules provide insights on the characteristics used by the GNN to classify the graphs. Especially, this allows to identify the hidden features built by the GNN through its different layers. Also, these rules can subsequently be used for explaining GNN decisions. Experiments on both synthetic and real-life datasets show highly competitive performance, with up to 200% improvement in fidelity on explaining graph classification over the SOTA methods.
6/18/2024
🏅
An Empirical Study of Realized GNN Expressiveness
Yanbo Wang, Muhan Zhang
0
0
Research on the theoretical expressiveness of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) has developed rapidly, and many methods have been proposed to enhance the expressiveness. However, most methods do not have a uniform expressiveness measure except for a few that strictly follow the $k$-dimensional Weisfeiler-Lehman ($k$-WL) test hierarchy, leading to difficulties in quantitatively comparing their expressiveness. Previous research has attempted to use datasets for measurement, but facing problems with difficulty (any model surpassing 1-WL has nearly 100% accuracy), granularity (models tend to be either 100% correct or near random guess), and scale (only several essentially different graphs involved). To address these limitations, we study the realized expressive power that a practical model instance can achieve using a novel expressiveness dataset, BREC, which poses greater difficulty (with up to 4-WL-indistinguishable graphs), finer granularity (enabling comparison of models between 1-WL and 3-WL), a larger scale (consisting of 800 1-WL-indistinguishable graphs that are non-isomorphic to each other). We synthetically test 23 models with higher-than-1-WL expressiveness on BREC. Our experiment gives the first thorough measurement of the realized expressiveness of those state-of-the-art beyond-1-WL GNN models and reveals the gap between theoretical and realized expressiveness. Dataset and evaluation codes are released at: https://github.com/GraphPKU/BREC.
6/4/2024
GNNAnatomy: Systematic Generation and Evaluation of Multi-Level Explanations for Graph Neural Networks
Hsiao-Ying Lu, Yiran Li, Ujwal Pratap Krishna Kaluvakolanu Thyagarajan, Kwan-Liu Ma
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have proven highly effective in various machine learning (ML) tasks involving graphs, such as node/graph classification and link prediction. However, explaining the decisions made by GNNs poses challenges because of the aggregated relational information based on graph structure, leading to complex data transformations. Existing methods for explaining GNNs often face limitations in systematically exploring diverse substructures and evaluating results in the absence of ground truths. To address this gap, we introduce GNNAnatomy, a model- and dataset-agnostic visual analytics system designed to facilitate the generation and evaluation of multi-level explanations for GNNs. In GNNAnatomy, we employ graphlets to elucidate GNN behavior in graph-level classification tasks. By analyzing the associations between GNN classifications and graphlet frequencies, we formulate hypothesized factual and counterfactual explanations. To validate a hypothesized graphlet explanation, we introduce two metrics: (1) the correlation between its frequency and the classification confidence, and (2) the change in classification confidence after removing this substructure from the original graph. To demonstrate the effectiveness of GNNAnatomy, we conduct case studies on both real-world and synthetic graph datasets from various domains. Additionally, we qualitatively compare GNNAnatomy with a state-of-the-art GNN explainer, demonstrating the utility and versatility of our design.
6/10/2024
🔄
Future Directions in the Theory of Graph Machine Learning
Christopher Morris, Fabrizio Frasca, Nadav Dym, Haggai Maron, .Ismail .Ilkan Ceylan, Ron Levie, Derek Lim, Michael Bronstein, Martin Grohe, Stefanie Jegelka
0
0
Machine learning on graphs, especially using graph neural networks (GNNs), has seen a surge in interest due to the wide availability of graph data across a broad spectrum of disciplines, from life to social and engineering sciences. Despite their practical success, our theoretical understanding of the properties of GNNs remains highly incomplete. Recent theoretical advancements primarily focus on elucidating the coarse-grained expressive power of GNNs, predominantly employing combinatorial techniques. However, these studies do not perfectly align with practice, particularly in understanding the generalization behavior of GNNs when trained with stochastic first-order optimization techniques. In this position paper, we argue that the graph machine learning community needs to shift its attention to developing a balanced theory of graph machine learning, focusing on a more thorough understanding of the interplay of expressive power, generalization, and optimization.
6/17/2024