Understanding the Interplay of Scale, Data, and Bias in Language Models: A Case Study with BERT
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines how biases in language models scale with model size.
- It investigates whether larger language models exhibit more pronounced biases compared to smaller models.
- The research aims to provide insights into how the scaling of language models affects their biases and limitations.
Plain English Explanation
As language models become larger and more complex, there is a concern that they may also exhibit more pronounced biases. This paper explores whether the size of a language model is linked to the severity of its biases.
The researchers wanted to understand if bigger language models are "meaner" - that is, if they display more biases and prejudices than their smaller counterparts. This is an important question, as these models are increasingly being used in real-world applications that can impact people's lives. If larger models are more biased, it could lead to unfair or harmful outcomes.
The study examines how various types of biases, such as gender, racial, and political biases, scale as language models grow in size. By analyzing how biases change as the models become larger, the researchers aim to provide insights into the relationship between model scale and bias.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a systematic investigation into how different types of biases scale with the size of language models. The researchers evaluated a range of model sizes, from smaller models to the largest available, and measured various bias metrics to understand how biases change as the models grow in scale.
The study looked at several common biases, including gender, racial, and political biases. The researchers used well-established bias evaluation techniques, such as word embedding association tests and targeted probing, to quantify the biases in the language models.
By analyzing the trends in bias metrics as the model size increased, the paper provides insights into how the scaling of language models affects their biases and limitations. The results suggest that the relationship between model size and bias is complex, with some biases becoming more pronounced in larger models while others exhibit more mixed or inconsistent scaling patterns.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that the relationship between model size and bias is not straightforward, and that further research is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms. The authors note that their analysis is limited to a specific set of bias metrics and may not capture the full complexity of biases in language models.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential causes of the observed bias scaling patterns, such as the training data, model architecture, or optimization objectives. Exploring these factors in more depth could lead to a deeper understanding of how biases emerge and scale in large language models.
While the paper provides valuable empirical insights, it also highlights the need for continued research and development to mitigate biases in these powerful AI systems. As language models become increasingly influential, it is crucial to understand and address their limitations to ensure fair and equitable outcomes for all users.
Conclusion
This study offers important insights into the relationship between the size of language models and their biases. The findings suggest that the scaling of biases is not a simple or linear process, with some biases becoming more pronounced in larger models while others exhibit more complex patterns.
The implications of this research are significant, as language models are increasingly being deployed in high-stakes applications that can have real-world impacts on individuals and communities. Understanding how biases scale with model size is a crucial step towards developing more ethical and responsible AI systems that can better serve the needs of all users.
The paper's insights highlight the importance of continued research and development in this area, as well as the need for ongoing vigilance and mitigation strategies to address the biases and limitations of large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding the Interplay of Scale, Data, and Bias in Language Models: A Case Study with BERT
Muhammad Ali, Swetasudha Panda, Qinlan Shen, Michael Wick, Ari Kobren
In the current landscape of language model research, larger models, larger datasets and more compute seems to be the only way to advance towards intelligence. While there have been extensive studies of scaling laws and models' scaling behaviors, the effect of scale on a model's social biases and stereotyping tendencies has received less attention. In this study, we explore the influence of model scale and pre-training data on its learnt social biases. We focus on BERT -- an extremely popular language model -- and investigate biases as they show up during language modeling (upstream), as well as during classification applications after fine-tuning (downstream). Our experiments on four architecture sizes of BERT demonstrate that pre-training data substantially influences how upstream biases evolve with model scale. With increasing scale, models pre-trained on large internet scrapes like Common Crawl exhibit higher toxicity, whereas models pre-trained on moderated data sources like Wikipedia show greater gender stereotypes. However, downstream biases generally decrease with increasing model scale, irrespective of the pre-training data. Our results highlight the qualitative role of pre-training data in the biased behavior of language models, an often overlooked aspect in the study of scale. Through a detailed case study of BERT, we shed light on the complex interplay of data and model scale, and investigate how it translates to concrete biases.
Read more8/1/2024
📈
0
Downstream bias mitigation is all you need
Arkadeep Baksi, Rahul Singh, Tarun Joshi
The advent of transformer-based architectures and large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the performance of natural language processing (NLP) models. Since these LLMs are trained on huge corpuses of data from the web and other sources, there has been a major concern about harmful prejudices that may potentially be transferred from the data. In many applications, these pre-trained LLMs are fine-tuned on task specific datasets, which can further contribute to biases. This paper studies the extent of biases absorbed by LLMs during pre-training as well as task-specific behaviour after fine-tuning. We found that controlled interventions on pre-trained LLMs, prior to fine-tuning, have minimal effect on lowering biases in classifiers. However, the biases present in domain-specific datasets play a much bigger role, and hence mitigating them at this stage has a bigger impact. While pre-training does matter, but after the model has been pre-trained, even slight changes to co-occurrence rates in the fine-tuning dataset has a significant effect on the bias of the model.
Read more8/29/2024
💬
0
Large Language Models are Biased Because They Are Large Language Models
Philip Resnik
This paper's primary goal is to provoke thoughtful discussion about the relationship between bias and fundamental properties of large language models. We do this by seeking to convince the reader that harmful biases are an inevitable consequence arising from the design of any large language model as LLMs are currently formulated. To the extent that this is true, it suggests that the problem of harmful bias cannot be properly addressed without a serious reconsideration of AI driven by LLMs, going back to the foundational assumptions underlying their design.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Exploring Scaling Trends in LLM Robustness
Nikolaus Howe, Micha{l} Zajac, Ian McKenzie, Oskar Hollinsworth, Tom Tseng, Pierre-Luc Bacon, Adam Gleave
Language model capabilities predictably improve from scaling a model's size and training data. Motivated by this, increasingly large language models have been trained, yielding an array of impressive capabilities. Yet these models are vulnerable to adversarial prompts, such as jailbreaks that hijack models to perform undesired behaviors, posing a significant risk of misuse. Prior work indicates that computer vision models become more robust with model and data scaling, raising the question: does language model robustness also improve with scale? We study this question empirically, finding that larger models respond substantially better to adversarial training, but there is little to no benefit from model scale in the absence of explicit defenses.
Read more7/29/2024