Understanding Robust Overfitting from the Feature Generalization Perspective

Read original: arXiv:2310.00607 - Published 7/30/2024 by Chaojian Yu, Xiaolong Shi, Jun Yu, Bo Han, Tongliang Liu
Total Score

0

🤔

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Adversarial training (AT) aims to make neural networks robust by incorporating adversarial perturbations into natural data.
  • However, AT suffers from the issue of robust overfitting (RO), which severely damages the model's robustness.
  • This paper investigates RO from a novel feature generalization perspective.

Plain English Explanation

Adversarial training is a technique used to make machine learning models more robust to adversarial attacks. The idea is to expose the model to "adversarial examples" during training, which are slightly modified versions of the original data that can fool the model. By learning to correctly classify these adversarial examples, the model becomes more robust and less vulnerable to such attacks.

However, the authors of this paper explain that adversarial training can sometimes lead to a problem called "robust overfitting" (RO). This means the model becomes very good at classifying the specific adversarial examples it was trained on, but loses the ability to generalize and perform well on other types of data. In other words, the model becomes "overly specialized" and loses its broader understanding.

The researchers investigated this RO issue from a new angle, focusing on how adversarial training affects the model's ability to learn general features from the natural data. They found that the main cause of RO is not the adversarial perturbations themselves, but rather the way those perturbations interact with the natural data and degrade the model's ability to learn useful features.

Based on this, the researchers proposed some new techniques to prevent this feature generalization degradation during adversarial training, which they show can effectively mitigate RO and improve the model's overall robustness.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contributions of this paper are:

  1. Factor Ablation Experiments: The researchers designed experiments to separately assess the impacts of natural data and adversarial perturbations on robust overfitting (RO). They found that the inducing factor of RO stems from the natural data, not the adversarial perturbations.

  2. Feature Generalization Hypothesis: Given that the only difference between adversarial and natural training is the inclusion of adversarial perturbations, the authors hypothesized that these perturbations degrade the generalization of features in the natural data. They verified this hypothesis through extensive experiments.

  3. Feature Generalization Perspective on RO: Based on their findings, the researchers provided a holistic view of RO from the feature generalization perspective, which helps explain various empirical behaviors associated with RO.

  4. Mitigation Techniques: To address the feature generalization degradation, the authors devised two representative methods: "attack strength" and "data augmentation". Experiments showed these techniques can effectively mitigate RO and enhance adversarial robustness.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel and insightful perspective on the robust overfitting (RO) issue in adversarial training. By focusing on feature generalization, the authors were able to uncover the underlying cause of RO, which was previously not well understood.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the proposed mitigation techniques. For example, it's unclear how the "attack strength" and "data augmentation" methods would scale to larger, more complex models and datasets. Additionally, the experiments were conducted on a limited set of benchmark datasets, so the generalizability of the findings to real-world applications remains to be seen.

Furthermore, the paper does not explore alternative approaches to addressing RO, such as regularization techniques or adversarial training paradigms that do not rely on adversarial examples. Further research in these areas could provide additional insights and solutions to the RO problem.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel feature generalization perspective on the robust overfitting (RO) issue in adversarial training. By identifying the root cause of RO as the degradation of feature generalization in natural data, the researchers were able to devise effective mitigation techniques that can enhance the overall adversarial robustness of neural networks.

While the paper makes a significant contribution to understanding and addressing RO, further research is needed to explore the scalability and generalizability of the proposed solutions, as well as investigate alternative approaches to improving the robustness of machine learning models. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the ongoing efforts to build more secure and reliable AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤔

Total Score

0

Understanding Robust Overfitting from the Feature Generalization Perspective

Chaojian Yu, Xiaolong Shi, Jun Yu, Bo Han, Tongliang Liu

Adversarial training (AT) constructs robust neural networks by incorporating adversarial perturbations into natural data. However, it is plagued by the issue of robust overfitting (RO), which severely damages the model's robustness. In this paper, we investigate RO from a novel feature generalization perspective. Specifically, we design factor ablation experiments to assess the respective impacts of natural data and adversarial perturbations on RO, identifying that the inducing factor of RO stems from natural data. Given that the only difference between adversarial and natural training lies in the inclusion of adversarial perturbations, we further hypothesize that adversarial perturbations degrade the generalization of features in natural data and verify this hypothesis through extensive experiments. Based on these findings, we provide a holistic view of RO from the feature generalization perspective and explain various empirical behaviors associated with RO. To examine our feature generalization perspective, we devise two representative methods, attack strength and data augmentation, to prevent the feature generalization degradation during AT. Extensive experiments conducted on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed methods can effectively mitigate RO and enhance adversarial robustness.

Read more

7/30/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

Adversarial Training on Purification (AToP): Advancing Both Robustness and Generalization

Guang Lin, Chao Li, Jianhai Zhang, Toshihisa Tanaka, Qibin Zhao

The deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to well-designed adversarial attacks. The most successful defense technique based on adversarial training (AT) can achieve optimal robustness against particular attacks but cannot generalize well to unseen attacks. Another effective defense technique based on adversarial purification (AP) can enhance generalization but cannot achieve optimal robustness. Meanwhile, both methods share one common limitation on the degraded standard accuracy. To mitigate these issues, we propose a novel pipeline to acquire the robust purifier model, named Adversarial Training on Purification (AToP), which comprises two components: perturbation destruction by random transforms (RT) and purifier model fine-tuned (FT) by adversarial loss. RT is essential to avoid overlearning to known attacks, resulting in the robustness generalization to unseen attacks, and FT is essential for the improvement of robustness. To evaluate our method in an efficient and scalable way, we conduct extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNette to demonstrate that our method achieves optimal robustness and exhibits generalization ability against unseen attacks.

Read more

8/26/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

Stability and Generalization in Free Adversarial Training

Xiwei Cheng, Kexin Fu, Farzan Farnia

While adversarial training methods have resulted in significant improvements in the deep neural nets' robustness against norm-bounded adversarial perturbations, their generalization performance from training samples to test data has been shown to be considerably worse than standard empirical risk minimization methods. Several recent studies seek to connect the generalization behavior of adversarially trained classifiers to various gradient-based min-max optimization algorithms used for their training. In this work, we study the generalization performance of adversarial training methods using the algorithmic stability framework. Specifically, our goal is to compare the generalization performance of the vanilla adversarial training scheme fully optimizing the perturbations at every iteration vs. the free adversarial training simultaneously optimizing the norm-bounded perturbations and classifier parameters. Our proven generalization bounds indicate that the free adversarial training method could enjoy a lower generalization gap between training and test samples due to the simultaneous nature of its min-max optimization algorithm. We perform several numerical experiments to evaluate the generalization performance of vanilla, fast, and free adversarial training methods. Our empirical findings also show the improved generalization performance of the free adversarial training method and further demonstrate that the better generalization result could translate to greater robustness against black-box attack schemes. The code is available at https://github.com/Xiwei-Cheng/Stability_FreeAT.

Read more

4/16/2024

Generating Less Certain Adversarial Examples Improves Robust Generalization
Total Score

0

Generating Less Certain Adversarial Examples Improves Robust Generalization

Minxing Zhang, Michael Backes, Xiao Zhang

This paper revisits the robust overfitting phenomenon of adversarial training. Observing that models with better robust generalization performance are less certain in predicting adversarially generated training inputs, we argue that overconfidence in predicting adversarial examples is a potential cause. Therefore, we hypothesize that generating less certain adversarial examples improves robust generalization, and propose a formal definition of adversarial certainty that captures the variance of the model's predicted logits on adversarial examples. Our theoretical analysis of synthetic distributions characterizes the connection between adversarial certainty and robust generalization. Accordingly, built upon the notion of adversarial certainty, we develop a general method to search for models that can generate training-time adversarial inputs with reduced certainty, while maintaining the model's capability in distinguishing adversarial examples. Extensive experiments on image benchmarks demonstrate that our method effectively learns models with consistently improved robustness and mitigates robust overfitting, confirming the importance of generating less certain adversarial examples for robust generalization.

Read more

5/24/2024