Stability and Generalization in Free Adversarial Training
2404.08980
0
0
🏋️
Abstract
While adversarial training methods have resulted in significant improvements in the deep neural nets' robustness against norm-bounded adversarial perturbations, their generalization performance from training samples to test data has been shown to be considerably worse than standard empirical risk minimization methods. Several recent studies seek to connect the generalization behavior of adversarially trained classifiers to various gradient-based min-max optimization algorithms used for their training. In this work, we study the generalization performance of adversarial training methods using the algorithmic stability framework. Specifically, our goal is to compare the generalization performance of the vanilla adversarial training scheme fully optimizing the perturbations at every iteration vs. the free adversarial training simultaneously optimizing the norm-bounded perturbations and classifier parameters. Our proven generalization bounds indicate that the free adversarial training method could enjoy a lower generalization gap between training and test samples due to the simultaneous nature of its min-max optimization algorithm. We perform several numerical experiments to evaluate the generalization performance of vanilla, fast, and free adversarial training methods. Our empirical findings also show the improved generalization performance of the free adversarial training method and further demonstrate that the better generalization result could translate to greater robustness against black-box attack schemes. The code is available at https://github.com/Xiwei-Cheng/Stability_FreeAT.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Adversarial training has improved deep neural networks' robustness against certain types of attacks, but can hurt their overall performance on regular test data.
- This paper studies the generalization performance of different adversarial training methods using a mathematical framework called algorithmic stability.
- The authors compare the standard adversarial training approach to a "free" adversarial training method that simultaneously optimizes the adversarial perturbations and the neural network parameters.
- The authors provide theoretical analysis and empirical results showing that the free adversarial training method can achieve better generalization performance and improved robustness against certain attack schemes.
Plain English Explanation
Deep neural networks have become powerful tools for a wide range of tasks, from image recognition to language modeling. However, these models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small, carefully crafted perturbations to the input can cause the model to make incorrect predictions.
Researchers have developed adversarial training methods to help make neural networks more robust to these types of attacks. The key idea is to train the model on both the original data and adversarially perturbed versions of the data, so that it learns to be more resilient.
While adversarial training has led to significant improvements in the model's robustness to certain types of attacks, it can also hurt the model's overall performance on regular (non-adversarial) test data. This is a bit of a trade-off - the model becomes more secure against specific attacks, but may not generalize as well to real-world data.
In this paper, the authors explore a different approach called "free" adversarial training. Instead of fully optimizing the adversarial perturbations at each training step, this method simultaneously optimizes the perturbations and the model parameters. The authors show, both theoretically and experimentally, that this approach can lead to better generalization performance and improved robustness against certain types of black-box attacks.
The key insight is that by allowing the perturbations and model parameters to co-adapt during training, the model can learn a more stable and generalizable representation of the data. This contrasts with the standard adversarial training approach, where the model may overfit to the specific adversarial examples seen during training.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on comparing the generalization performance of two main adversarial training approaches:
- Vanilla adversarial training: This method fully optimizes the adversarial perturbations at each training iteration, while holding the model parameters fixed.
- Free adversarial training: This method simultaneously optimizes both the adversarial perturbations and the model parameters at each iteration.
The authors use the algorithmic stability framework to analyze the generalization properties of these two approaches. Algorithmic stability is a mathematical concept that quantifies how sensitive a learning algorithm is to changes in the training data.
The authors prove theoretical bounds showing that the free adversarial training method can enjoy a lower generalization gap between the training and test data, compared to the vanilla adversarial training approach. This is due to the simultaneous optimization of the perturbations and model parameters in the free adversarial training method.
To support their theoretical findings, the authors conduct extensive numerical experiments on standard image classification benchmarks. They compare the generalization performance and robustness of vanilla, fast, and free adversarial training methods. The results show that the free adversarial training method consistently outperforms the other approaches in terms of both generalization and black-box robustness.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of the generalization properties of different adversarial training methods. The authors' use of the algorithmic stability framework provides a solid mathematical foundation for their claims, and the experimental results help validate the theoretical insights.
One potential limitation of the work is that the theoretical analysis assumes certain simplifying assumptions, such as the convexity of the loss function. In practice, deep neural networks often have non-convex loss landscapes, which may require additional analysis to fully understand the implications of the authors' findings.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a specific type of adversarial perturbation (norm-bounded), and it would be interesting to see how the results generalize to other types of adversarial attacks, such as semantic-based attacks or targeted attacks.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of adversarial training and its implications for generalization and robustness. The insights provided can help guide the design of more effective and reliable deep learning models in the face of adversarial threats.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive study of the generalization performance of different adversarial training methods for deep neural networks. The authors use the algorithmic stability framework to provide theoretical analysis and empirical evidence showing that the "free" adversarial training approach, which simultaneously optimizes the adversarial perturbations and the model parameters, can achieve better generalization and robustness compared to the standard adversarial training method.
These findings have important implications for the development of secure and reliable deep learning systems, as they suggest that the way adversarial training is implemented can have a significant impact on the model's overall performance and real-world applicability. The insights from this work can help researchers and practitioners design more effective adversarial training strategies that balance robustness and generalization, paving the way for more robust and trustworthy AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Uniformly Stable Algorithms for Adversarial Training and Beyond
Jiancong Xiao, Jiawei Zhang, Zhi-Quan Luo, Asuman Ozdaglar
0
0
In adversarial machine learning, neural networks suffer from a significant issue known as robust overfitting, where the robust test accuracy decreases over epochs (Rice et al., 2020). Recent research conducted by Xing et al.,2021; Xiao et al., 2022 has focused on studying the uniform stability of adversarial training. Their investigations revealed that SGD-based adversarial training fails to exhibit uniform stability, and the derived stability bounds align with the observed phenomenon of robust overfitting in experiments. This motivates us to develop uniformly stable algorithms specifically tailored for adversarial training. To this aim, we introduce Moreau envelope-$mathcal{A}$, a variant of the Moreau Envelope-type algorithm. We employ a Moreau envelope function to reframe the original problem as a min-min problem, separating the non-strong convexity and non-smoothness of the adversarial loss. Then, this approach alternates between solving the inner and outer minimization problems to achieve uniform stability without incurring additional computational overhead. In practical scenarios, we show the efficacy of ME-$mathcal{A}$ in mitigating the issue of robust overfitting. Beyond its application in adversarial training, this represents a fundamental result in uniform stability analysis, as ME-$mathcal{A}$ is the first algorithm to exhibit uniform stability for weakly-convex, non-smooth problems.
5/6/2024
Generating Less Certain Adversarial Examples Improves Robust Generalization
Minxing Zhang, Michael Backes, Xiao Zhang
0
0
This paper revisits the robust overfitting phenomenon of adversarial training. Observing that models with better robust generalization performance are less certain in predicting adversarially generated training inputs, we argue that overconfidence in predicting adversarial examples is a potential cause. Therefore, we hypothesize that generating less certain adversarial examples improves robust generalization, and propose a formal definition of adversarial certainty that captures the variance of the model's predicted logits on adversarial examples. Our theoretical analysis of synthetic distributions characterizes the connection between adversarial certainty and robust generalization. Accordingly, built upon the notion of adversarial certainty, we develop a general method to search for models that can generate training-time adversarial inputs with reduced certainty, while maintaining the model's capability in distinguishing adversarial examples. Extensive experiments on image benchmarks demonstrate that our method effectively learns models with consistently improved robustness and mitigates robust overfitting, confirming the importance of generating less certain adversarial examples for robust generalization.
5/24/2024
Rethinking Invariance Regularization in Adversarial Training to Improve Robustness-Accuracy Trade-off
Futa Waseda, Ching-Chun Chang, Isao Echizen
0
0
Although adversarial training has been the state-of-the-art approach to defend against adversarial examples (AEs), it suffers from a robustness-accuracy trade-off, where high robustness is achieved at the cost of clean accuracy. In this work, we leverage invariance regularization on latent representations to learn discriminative yet adversarially invariant representations, aiming to mitigate this trade-off. We analyze two key issues in representation learning with invariance regularization: (1) a gradient conflict between invariance loss and classification objectives, leading to suboptimal convergence, and (2) the mixture distribution problem arising from diverged distributions of clean and adversarial inputs. To address these issues, we propose Asymmetrically Representation-regularized Adversarial Training (AR-AT), which incorporates asymmetric invariance loss with stop-gradient operation and a predictor to improve the convergence, and a split-BatchNorm (BN) structure to resolve the mixture distribution problem. Our method significantly improves the robustness-accuracy trade-off by learning adversarially invariant representations without sacrificing discriminative ability. Furthermore, we discuss the relevance of our findings to knowledge-distillation-based defense methods, contributing to a deeper understanding of their relative successes.
5/30/2024
Uniform Convergence of Adversarially Robust Classifiers
Rachel Morris, Ryan Murray
0
0
In recent years there has been significant interest in the effect of different types of adversarial perturbations in data classification problems. Many of these models incorporate the adversarial power, which is an important parameter with an associated trade-off between accuracy and robustness. This work considers a general framework for adversarially-perturbed classification problems, in a large data or population-level limit. In such a regime, we demonstrate that as adversarial strength goes to zero that optimal classifiers converge to the Bayes classifier in the Hausdorff distance. This significantly strengthens previous results, which generally focus on $L^1$-type convergence. The main argument relies upon direct geometric comparisons and is inspired by techniques from geometric measure theory.
6/24/2024