Understanding Sample Generation Strategies for Learning Heuristic Functions in Classical Planning

Overview

• This paper explores the problem of learning effective heuristic functions for classical planning tasks using neural networks.
• The heuristic function is learned from a limited number of state samples with their corresponding cost-to-goal estimates.
• The goal is for the learned heuristic to generalize well and provide accurate cost-to-goal estimates for all states in the state space with the same goal condition.
• The key focus is on understanding how the sample generation strategy impacts the performance of a greedy best-first search (GBFS) algorithm guided by the learned heuristic.

Plain English Explanation

In this research, the authors investigate how to train neural networks to learn good heuristic functions for classical planning problems. A heuristic function is used to estimate the cost of reaching the goal from a given state, which is crucial for guiding efficient search algorithms like greedy best-first search (GBFS).

The key challenge is that the researchers only have access to a limited number of state samples, each with an estimate of the cost to reach the goal. They need to use this limited data to train a neural network that can accurately estimate the cost-to-goal for

state in the state space with the same goal condition.

The main focus of the paper is understanding how the strategy used to generate the sample states impacts the quality of the learned heuristic function. The researchers find that two main factors determine the heuristic quality: 1) the algorithm used to generate the samples, and 2) how close the sample cost-to-goal estimates are to the perfect values.

Based on these insights, the authors propose several practical strategies to improve the sample generation process and the quality of the cost-to-goal estimates. These strategies lead to a learned heuristic that can significantly boost the performance of the GBFS algorithm compared to a baseline approach.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a controlled experimental study to investigate the factors that influence the performance of a learned heuristic function for classical planning tasks. The authors train neural networks to learn the heuristic function from a limited set of state samples, each with an associated cost-to-goal estimate.

The researchers test different sample generation algorithms, including sampling-based motion planning techniques and reinforcement learning approaches. They also experiment with varying the quality of the cost-to-goal estimates, from perfect values to more approximate ones.

The key findings are that both the sample generation strategy and the quality of the cost-to-goal estimates play a critical role in determining the performance of the learned heuristic. Having perfect cost-to-goal values is not enough if the samples are not well distributed across the state space. Conversely, even imperfect cost estimates can lead to a useful heuristic if the samples are strategically selected.

Based on these insights, the authors propose several practical strategies to improve the sample generation and cost-to-goal estimation processes. These include techniques to generate more representative states, as well as methods to refine the cost estimates. When used to guide a GBFS algorithm, the learned heuristic resulting from these strategies can increase the mean coverage by over 30% compared to a baseline approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough and well-designed experimental study that provides valuable insights into the factors that influence the performance of learned heuristic functions for classical planning. The authors' focus on understanding the interplay between sample generation and cost-to-goal estimate quality is particularly insightful.

One potential limitation of the research is that it is focused on a specific type of planning task and domain. While the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their proposed strategies on these tasks, it would be interesting to see how well the findings generalize to a broader range of planning problems and domains.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the computational complexity and runtime implications of the different sample generation and cost-to-goal estimation strategies. This information would be useful for practitioners aiming to apply these techniques in real-world planning scenarios with strict computational constraints.

Another area for further research could be investigating the potential benefits of combining multiple learned heuristics or incorporating admissible bounds to further improve the performance of the GBFS algorithm.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of learning heuristic functions for classical planning and provides a solid foundation for future research in this area.

Conclusion

This paper explores the problem of learning effective heuristic functions for classical planning tasks using neural networks. The key focus is on understanding how the strategy used to generate the training samples, as well as the quality of the cost-to-goal estimates, influence the performance of a greedy best-first search algorithm guided by the learned heuristic.

The authors' controlled experiments reveal that both the sample generation algorithm and the accuracy of the cost-to-goal estimates are critical factors in determining the quality of the learned heuristic. Based on these insights, they propose several practical strategies to improve the sample generation and cost-to-goal estimation processes, leading to significant performance gains for the GBFS algorithm.

This research provides valuable guidance for practitioners and researchers working on planning problems, highlighting the importance of carefully considering the data used to train heuristic functions. The findings also open up avenues for future work, such as exploring the generalization of these techniques to a broader range of planning domains and investigating the computational trade-offs of the proposed strategies.