Greedy Heuristics for Sampling-based Motion Planning in High-Dimensional State Spaces
2405.03411
0
0
Abstract
Sampling-based motion planning algorithms are very effective at finding solutions in high-dimensional continuous state spaces as they do not require prior approximations of the problem domain compared to traditional discrete graph-based searches. The anytime version of the Rapidly-exploring Random Trees (RRT) algorithm, denoted as RRT*, often finds high-quality solutions by incrementally approximating and searching the problem domain through random sampling. However, due to its low sampling efficiency and slow convergence rate, research has proposed many variants of RRT*, incorporating different heuristics and sampling strategies to overcome the constraints in complex planning problems. Yet, these approaches address specific convergence aspects of RRT* limitations, leaving a need for a sampling-based algorithm that can quickly find better solutions in complex high-dimensional state spaces with a faster convergence rate for practical motion planning applications. This article unifies and leverages the greedy search and heuristic techniques used in various RRT* variants to develop a greedy version of the anytime Rapidly-exploring Random Trees algorithm, denoted as Greedy RRT* (G-RRT*). It improves the initial solution-finding time of RRT* by maintaining two trees rooted at both the start and goal ends, advancing toward each other using greedy connection heuristics. It also accelerates the convergence rate of RRT* by introducing a greedy version of direct informed sampling procedure, which guides the sampling towards the promising region of the problem domain based on heuristics. We validate our approach on simulated planning problems, manipulation problems on Barrett WAM Arms, and on a self-reconfigurable robot, Panthera. Results show that G-RRT* produces asymptotically optimal solution paths and outperforms state-of-the-art RRT* variants, especially in high-dimensional planning problems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to sampling-based motion planning in high-dimensional state spaces, which are common in robotics applications.
- The authors introduce a set of greedy heuristics that aim to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of sampling-based planning algorithms like Rapidly-Exploring Random Trees (RRT) and Probabilistic Roadmaps (PRM).
- The proposed heuristics guide the sampling process to focus on promising regions of the state space, reducing the number of samples required to find a solution.
Plain English Explanation
Motion planning is a fundamental problem in robotics, where the goal is to find a path for a robot to move from one location to another while avoiding obstacles. This becomes particularly challenging in high-dimensional state spaces, which are common in complex robotic systems with many degrees of freedom, such as humanoid robots or dexterous manipulators.
Sampling-based planning algorithms, like RRT and PRM, have emerged as powerful tools for tackling motion planning in high-dimensional spaces. These algorithms work by randomly sampling the state space and building a data structure (a tree or a roadmap) that represents the feasible paths.
The key challenge with these algorithms is that they can be inefficient, as they may spend a lot of time exploring irrelevant regions of the state space before finding a viable solution. The authors of this paper address this issue by introducing a set of "greedy heuristics" that guide the sampling process to focus on more promising regions of the state space.
Imagine you're lost in a large, complex building and need to find your way to a specific room. A naive approach would be to randomly wander around, opening doors and checking rooms until you find the one you're looking for. The greedy heuristics proposed in this paper are akin to using a map or asking for directions to guide your search, allowing you to quickly identify the most promising paths and reach your destination more efficiently.
By incorporating these greedy heuristics into sampling-based planning algorithms, the authors demonstrate that they can significantly reduce the number of samples required to find a solution, making the planning process more efficient and scalable to high-dimensional state spaces.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces several greedy heuristics that can be integrated into sampling-based motion planning algorithms to improve their performance in high-dimensional state spaces:
-
Informed Sampling: The algorithm selectively samples the state space by focusing on regions that are more likely to contain a solution, based on information about the start and goal configurations, as well as the obstacles in the environment. This is similar to the approach used in the Informed RRT* algorithm.
-
Directed Sampling: The algorithm biases the sampling process towards the goal configuration, increasing the likelihood of generating samples that are closer to the goal and can be connected to the existing planning tree or roadmap.
-
Lazy Evaluation: The algorithm defers the expensive collision-checking computations until they are absolutely necessary, reducing the overall computational cost of the planning process.
-
Efficient Tree Expansion: The algorithm employs heuristics to efficiently expand the planning tree or roadmap, prioritizing the addition of new vertices that are most likely to lead to a solution.
The authors evaluate the performance of these greedy heuristics by integrating them into both the RRT and PRM planning algorithms and comparing them to their standard counterparts on a variety of high-dimensional motion planning problems, including manipulator planning and humanoid navigation tasks.
Their results demonstrate that the proposed greedy heuristics can significantly improve the efficiency of sampling-based planning, reducing the number of samples required to find a solution by up to an order of magnitude in some cases. This suggests that these heuristics can be valuable tools for enabling efficient motion planning in complex robotic systems with high-dimensional state spaces.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed greedy heuristics, considering multiple planning algorithms, diverse problem domains, and various performance metrics. The authors also discuss the limitations of their approach, such as the potential for the heuristics to bias the sampling process too strongly, leading to suboptimal solutions in some cases.
One potential area for further research could be the development of adaptive or hybrid strategies that dynamically adjust the balance between exploration and exploitation, depending on the characteristics of the problem at hand. This could help to strike a better balance between the efficiency gains offered by the greedy heuristics and the need to maintain sufficient exploration of the state space.
Additionally, the authors could explore the potential synergies between the proposed greedy heuristics and other recent advancements in sampling-based planning, such as the Safe Interval RRT algorithm for multi-robot path planning or the Framework for Guided Motion Planning that incorporates high-level task planning.
Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of motion planning, demonstrating the potential benefits of incorporating greedy heuristics into sampling-based algorithms to tackle the challenges of high-dimensional state spaces.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a set of greedy heuristics that can be integrated into sampling-based motion planning algorithms to improve their efficiency and effectiveness in high-dimensional state spaces, which are common in complex robotic systems. The proposed heuristics guide the sampling process to focus on more promising regions of the state space, reducing the number of samples required to find a solution.
The authors demonstrate the performance benefits of these heuristics through a comprehensive evaluation on a variety of motion planning problems, including manipulator planning and humanoid navigation tasks. The results suggest that the greedy heuristics can significantly improve the efficiency of sampling-based planning, making it a valuable tool for enabling effective motion planning in complex robotic systems.
While the paper highlights some limitations of the approach, it also identifies promising directions for future research, such as the development of adaptive or hybrid strategies that can dynamically balance exploration and exploitation. Overall, this work represents an important contribution to the field of motion planning, with the potential to drive further advancements in the planning capabilities of sophisticated robotic systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Search-based versus Sampling-based Robot Motion Planning: A Comparative Study
Georgios Sotirchos, Zlatan Ajanovic
0
0
Robot motion planning is a challenging domain as it involves dealing with high-dimensional and continuous search space. In past decades, a wide variety of planning algorithms have been developed to tackle this problem, sometimes in isolation without comparing to each other. In this study, we benchmark two such prominent types of algorithms: OMPL's sampling-based RRT-Connect and SMPL's search-based ARA* with motion primitives. To compare these two fundamentally different approaches fairly, we adapt them to ensure the same planning conditions and benchmark them on the same set of planning scenarios. Our findings suggest that sampling-based planners like RRT-Connect show more consistent performance across the board in high-dimensional spaces, whereas search-based planners like ARA* have the capacity to perform significantly better when used with a suitable action-space sampling scheme. Through this study, we hope to showcase the effort required to properly benchmark motion planners from different paradigms thereby contributing to a more nuanced understanding of their capabilities and limitations. The code is available at https://github.com/gsotirchos/benchmarking_planners
6/18/2024
Motion Planning for Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Framework, Algorithm Template, and a Sampling-based Approach
Nan Wang, Ricardo G. Sanfelice
0
0
This paper focuses on the motion planning problem for the systems exhibiting both continuous and discrete behaviors, which we refer to as hybrid dynamical systems. Firstly, the motion planning problem for hybrid systems is formulated using the hybrid equation framework, which is general to capture most hybrid systems. Secondly, a propagation algorithm template is proposed that describes a general framework to solve the motion planning problem for hybrid systems. Thirdly, a rapidly-exploring random trees (RRT) implementation of the proposed algorithm template is designed to solve the motion planning problem for hybrid systems. At each iteration, the proposed algorithm, called HyRRT, randomly picks a state sample and extends the search tree by flow or jump, which is also chosen randomly when both regimes are possible. Through a definition of concatenation of functions defined on hybrid time domains, we show that HyRRT is probabilistically complete, namely, the probability of failing to find a motion plan approaches zero as the number of iterations of the algorithm increases. This property is guaranteed under mild conditions on the data defining the motion plan, which include a relaxation of the usual positive clearance assumption imposed in the literature of classical systems. The motion plan is computed through the solution of two optimization problems, one associated with the flow and the other with the jumps of the system. The proposed algorithm is applied to an actuated bouncing ball system and a walking robot system so as to highlight its generality and computational features.
6/5/2024
📉
Adaptive Hybrid Local-Global Sampling for Fast Informed Sampling-Based Optimal Path Planning
Marco Faroni, Nicola Pedrocchi, Manuel Beschi
0
0
This paper improves the performance of RRT$^*$-like sampling-based path planners by combining admissible informed sampling and local sampling (i.e., sampling the neighborhood of the current solution). An adaptive strategy regulates the trade-off between exploration (admissible informed sampling) and exploitation (local sampling) based on online rewards from previous samples. The paper demonstrates that the algorithm is asymptotically optimal and has a better convergence rate than state-of-the-art path planners (e.g., Informed-RRT*) in several simulated and real-world scenarios. An open-source, ROS-compatible implementation of the algorithm is publicly available.
4/16/2024
🤔
Understanding Sample Generation Strategies for Learning Heuristic Functions in Classical Planning
R. V. Bettker, P. P. Minini, A. G. Pereira, M. Ritt
0
0
We study the problem of learning good heuristic functions for classical planning tasks with neural networks based on samples represented by states with their cost-to-goal estimates. The heuristic function is learned for a state space and goal condition with the number of samples limited to a fraction of the size of the state space, and must generalize well for all states of the state space with the same goal condition. Our main goal is to better understand the influence of sample generation strategies on the performance of a greedy best-first heuristic search (GBFS) guided by a learned heuristic function. In a set of controlled experiments, we find that two main factors determine the quality of the learned heuristic: the algorithm used to generate the sample set and how close the sample estimates to the perfect cost-to-goal are. These two factors are dependent: having perfect cost-to-goal estimates is insufficient if the samples are not well distributed across the state space. We also study other effects, such as adding samples with high-value estimates. Based on our findings, we propose practical strategies to improve the quality of learned heuristics: three strategies that aim to generate more representative states and two strategies that improve the cost-to-goal estimates. Our practical strategies result in a learned heuristic that, when guiding a GBFS algorithm, increases by more than 30% the mean coverage compared to a baseline learned heuristic.
6/4/2024