Understanding the Training and Generalization of Pretrained Transformer for Sequential Decision Making

Read original: arXiv:2405.14219 - Published 5/24/2024 by Hanzhao Wang, Yu Pan, Fupeng Sun, Shang Liu, Kalyan Talluri, Guanting Chen, Xiaocheng Li

🤔

Overview

The paper explores the use of supervised pretrained transformers for a class of sequential decision-making problems, including bandits, dynamic pricing, and newsvendor problems.
The authors note that the training of the transformer model can be viewed as a performative prediction problem, and they propose a solution that includes the transformer-generated action sequences in the training procedure.
The availability of optimal actions in the considered tasks allows the authors to analyze the properties of the pretrained transformer as an algorithm and explain why it may lack exploration, which can be automatically resolved.

Plain English Explanation

The paper investigates using a type of artificial intelligence model called a "transformer" to solve a class of decision-making problems. These problems include things like bandit problems, where you have to choose the best option from a set of possibilities, and dynamic pricing and newsvendor problems, where you have to decide how to price or stock products.

The authors note that training the transformer model is a bit tricky, as it can run into issues where the model's predictions don't match the real-world data it's trained on. To address this, the researchers propose a solution that includes the transformer's own predicted actions in the training process. This helps the model learn better and makes it more reliable.

The researchers also found that the transformer model has some interesting properties compared to traditional algorithms for these types of problems. For example, it can make better use of prior knowledge from the training data, and it can handle situations where the problem is not perfectly specified. However, the transformer model may also lack the ability to "explore" and try new things, which the researchers show can be automatically fixed.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on a class of sequential decision-making problems that are a subset of the general reinforcement learning formulation. These problems have no transition probability matrix, and they cover bandit, dynamic pricing, and newsvendor problems as special cases.

The authors note that the training of the transformer model can be viewed as a performative prediction problem, where the model's predictions can influence the underlying data distribution. Existing methods and theories largely ignore or cannot resolve this out-of-distribution issue.

To address this, the researchers propose a solution that includes the transformer-generated action sequences in the training procedure. This approach enjoys better properties both numerically and theoretically.

The availability of optimal actions in the considered tasks also allows the authors to analyze the properties of the pretrained transformer as an algorithm. They explain why the transformer model may lack exploration and how this can be automatically resolved, drawing insights from the Decision Transformer and Motion Transformer literature.

Numerically, the researchers categorize the advantages of the pretrained transformer over structured algorithms like UCB and Thompson sampling into three cases:

The transformer better utilizes the prior knowledge in the pretraining data.
The transformer can elegantly handle the misspecification issue suffered by the structured algorithms.
For short time horizons (e.g., T ≤ 50), the transformer behaves more greedily and enjoys much better regret than the structured algorithms, which are designed for asymptotic optimality.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel approach to using pretrained transformers for a class of sequential decision-making problems, offering insights into the transformer's properties and how they can be leveraged or improved.

One potential limitation is that the analysis is focused on a specific class of problems, and the findings may not necessarily generalize to a broader range of reinforcement learning tasks. Additionally, the authors do not delve into the computational complexity or scalability of their proposed approach, which could be important considerations in real-world applications.

Furthermore, the paper does not address potential ethical concerns or societal implications of using such AI systems for decision-making, particularly in high-stakes domains like healthcare or finance. [Researchers in the field of order-based pre-training have highlighted the importance of considering these issues when developing and deploying AI models.](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/learning-syntax-without-planting-trees-understanding-when)

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and promising approach, but further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and potential impacts of using pretrained transformers for sequential decision-making tasks.

Conclusion

This paper explores the use of supervised pretrained transformers for a class of sequential decision-making problems, including bandits, dynamic pricing, and newsvendor problems. The authors propose a solution to address the performative prediction issues that can arise during transformer training and analyze the properties of the pretrained transformer as an algorithm.

The key insights from this research include the ability of the transformer to better utilize prior knowledge, handle model misspecification, and exhibit more greedy behavior for short-term decision-making tasks. These findings have the potential to inform the development of more effective AI systems for various sequential decision-making applications.

However, the researchers also acknowledge the need for further investigation into the broader applicability, computational complexity, and ethical implications of their approach. As the field of AI continues to advance, it will be important to consider these important factors to ensure the responsible and beneficial deployment of these technologies.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤔

Understanding the Training and Generalization of Pretrained Transformer for Sequential Decision Making

Hanzhao Wang, Yu Pan, Fupeng Sun, Shang Liu, Kalyan Talluri, Guanting Chen, Xiaocheng Li

In this paper, we consider the supervised pretrained transformer for a class of sequential decision-making problems. The class of considered problems is a subset of the general formulation of reinforcement learning in that there is no transition probability matrix, and the class of problems covers bandits, dynamic pricing, and newsvendor problems as special cases. Such a structure enables the use of optimal actions/decisions in the pretraining phase, and the usage also provides new insights for the training and generalization of the pretrained transformer. We first note that the training of the transformer model can be viewed as a performative prediction problem, and the existing methods and theories largely ignore or cannot resolve the arisen out-of-distribution issue. We propose a natural solution that includes the transformer-generated action sequences in the training procedure, and it enjoys better properties both numerically and theoretically. The availability of the optimal actions in the considered tasks also allows us to analyze the properties of the pretrained transformer as an algorithm and explains why it may lack exploration and how this can be automatically resolved. Numerically, we categorize the advantages of the pretrained transformer over the structured algorithms such as UCB and Thompson sampling into three cases: (i) it better utilizes the prior knowledge in the pretraining data; (ii) it can elegantly handle the misspecification issue suffered by the structured algorithms; (iii) for short time horizon such as $Tle50$, it behaves more greedy and enjoys much better regret than the structured algorithms which are designed for asymptotic optimality.

5/24/2024

🏅

Transformers as Decision Makers: Provable In-Context Reinforcement Learning via Supervised Pretraining

Licong Lin, Yu Bai, Song Mei

Large transformer models pretrained on offline reinforcement learning datasets have demonstrated remarkable in-context reinforcement learning (ICRL) capabilities, where they can make good decisions when prompted with interaction trajectories from unseen environments. However, when and how transformers can be trained to perform ICRL have not been theoretically well-understood. In particular, it is unclear which reinforcement-learning algorithms transformers can perform in context, and how distribution mismatch in offline training data affects the learned algorithms. This paper provides a theoretical framework that analyzes supervised pretraining for ICRL. This includes two recently proposed training methods -- algorithm distillation and decision-pretrained transformers. First, assuming model realizability, we prove the supervised-pretrained transformer will imitate the conditional expectation of the expert algorithm given the observed trajectory. The generalization error will scale with model capacity and a distribution divergence factor between the expert and offline algorithms. Second, we show transformers with ReLU attention can efficiently approximate near-optimal online reinforcement learning algorithms like LinUCB and Thompson sampling for stochastic linear bandits, and UCB-VI for tabular Markov decision processes. This provides the first quantitative analysis of the ICRL capabilities of transformers pretrained from offline trajectories.

5/28/2024

Pretraining Decision Transformers with Reward Prediction for In-Context Multi-task Structured Bandit Learning

Subhojyoti Mukherjee, Josiah P. Hanna, Qiaomin Xie, Robert Nowak

In this paper, we study multi-task structured bandit problem where the goal is to learn a near-optimal algorithm that minimizes cumulative regret. The tasks share a common structure and the algorithm exploits the shared structure to minimize the cumulative regret for an unseen but related test task. We use a transformer as a decision-making algorithm to learn this shared structure so as to generalize to the test task. The prior work of pretrained decision transformers like DPT requires access to the optimal action during training which may be hard in several scenarios. Diverging from these works, our learning algorithm does not need the knowledge of optimal action per task during training but predicts a reward vector for each of the actions using only the observed offline data from the diverse training tasks. Finally, during inference time, it selects action using the reward predictions employing various exploration strategies in-context for an unseen test task. Our model outperforms other SOTA methods like DPT, and Algorithmic Distillation over a series of experiments on several structured bandit problems (linear, bilinear, latent, non-linear). Interestingly, we show that our algorithm, without the knowledge of the underlying problem structure, can learn a near-optimal policy in-context by leveraging the shared structure across diverse tasks. We further extend the field of pre-trained decision transformers by showing that they can leverage unseen tasks with new actions and still learn the underlying latent structure to derive a near-optimal policy. We validate this over several experiments to show that our proposed solution is very general and has wide applications to potentially emergent online and offline strategies at test time. Finally, we theoretically analyze the performance of our algorithm and obtain generalization bounds in the in-context multi-task learning setting.

6/10/2024

📶

Multimodal Pretrained Models for Verifiable Sequential Decision-Making: Planning, Grounding, and Perception

Yunhao Yang, Cyrus Neary, Ufuk Topcu

Recently developed pretrained models can encode rich world knowledge expressed in multiple modalities, such as text and images. However, the outputs of these models cannot be integrated into algorithms to solve sequential decision-making tasks. We develop an algorithm that utilizes the knowledge from pretrained models to construct and verify controllers for sequential decision-making tasks, and to ground these controllers to task environments through visual observations with formal guarantees. In particular, the algorithm queries a pretrained model with a user-provided, text-based task description and uses the model's output to construct an automaton-based controller that encodes the model's task-relevant knowledge. It allows formal verification of whether the knowledge encoded in the controller is consistent with other independently available knowledge, which may include abstract information on the environment or user-provided specifications. Next, the algorithm leverages the vision and language capabilities of pretrained models to link the observations from the task environment to the text-based control logic from the controller (e.g., actions and conditions that trigger the actions). We propose a mechanism to provide probabilistic guarantees on whether the controller satisfies the user-provided specifications under perceptual uncertainties. We demonstrate the algorithm's ability to construct, verify, and ground automaton-based controllers through a suite of real-world tasks, including daily life and robot manipulation tasks.

6/19/2024