Uniformly Stable Algorithms for Adversarial Training and Beyond

Read original: arXiv:2405.01817 - Published 5/6/2024 by Jiancong Xiao, Jiawei Zhang, Zhi-Quan Luo, Asuman Ozdaglar
Total Score

0

Uniformly Stable Algorithms for Adversarial Training and Beyond

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

This paper proposes a novel approach called "Uniformly Stable Algorithms" (USA) that aims to improve the stability and generalization of adversarial training. The key idea is to modify the optimization process to enforce uniform stability, which means the model's predictions are robust to small changes in the training data. This helps the model generalize better and be more resistant to adversarial attacks. The paper also provides theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrating the benefits of USA compared to standard adversarial training.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models can sometimes be fooled by small, carefully crafted changes to their inputs (called adversarial examples). This is a major challenge, as we want models to be reliable and robust in the real world. The authors of this paper tackle this problem by developing a new training technique called "Uniformly Stable Algorithms" (USA).

The core insight behind USA is that we can make models more stable and generalizable by enforcing a property called "uniform stability" during training. Uniform stability means the model's predictions don't change much when we make small tweaks to the training data. This helps the model learn more general patterns rather than just memorizing the specific training examples.

To achieve uniform stability, the authors modify the standard adversarial training process in a clever way. Instead of just optimizing the model to classify examples correctly, they also explicitly optimize for stability - ensuring the model's outputs don't change too much when the inputs are slightly perturbed. This makes the model more robust to adversarial attacks and helps it generalize better to new, unseen data.

The paper provides both theoretical analysis and experimental results demonstrating the benefits of USA. Compared to standard adversarial training, USA is shown to produce models that are more stable, generalize better, and are more resistant to a wide range of adversarial attacks. This is an important advance that could help make machine learning systems more reliable and trustworthy in real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is the introduction of "Uniformly Stable Algorithms" (USA), a new training framework for improving the stability and generalization of adversarially trained models.

At a high level, the USA approach modifies the standard adversarial training objective to explicitly encourage uniform stability. Uniform stability means the model's predictions are robust to small changes in the training data - i.e., the model's outputs don't change much when we make small perturbations to the inputs. This is a stronger notion of stability compared to previous work, which focused on local Lipschitz continuity.

Mathematically, the USA objective function combines the standard adversarial training loss with an additional term that measures the sensitivity of the model's predictions to changes in the training examples. This encourages the optimization process to find model parameters that are not just accurate on the training data, but also uniformly stable across the entire data distribution.

The paper provides a detailed theoretical analysis, showing that USA can provably achieve better generalization bounds compared to standard adversarial training. Importantly, these bounds are independent of the model architecture or optimization method used.

The authors also conduct extensive empirical evaluations, comparing USA to baseline adversarial training methods across a range of datasets and threat models. The results demonstrate that USA-trained models exhibit significantly improved stability, robustness to a wider class of adversarial attacks, and better generalization to held-out test data. These benefits are observed consistently across different model architectures and training setups.

This work builds on previous research on adversarial training and stability-based generalization, such as the papers on Adversarial Consistency, Mean Curvature Flow, and Strong Transferable Attacks. It also relates to the novel approach proposed in the paper on Guarding from Adversarial Attacks.

Critical Analysis

The Uniformly Stable Algorithms (USA) approach presented in this paper is a compelling and well-justified contribution to the field of adversarial machine learning. The authors provide a strong theoretical foundation for their method, as well as compelling empirical results demonstrating its benefits.

One potential limitation of the work is the computational overhead introduced by the additional stability term in the objective function. While the authors show that USA can be efficiently implemented, the extra cost may be a concern for large-scale or time-sensitive applications. Future research could explore ways to further optimize the USA training process or develop fast approximations.

Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the image classification setting. It would be interesting to see how the USA approach generalizes to other domains, such as natural language processing or reinforcement learning, where adversarial robustness is also a critical issue. The authors mention this as a potential area for future work, similar to the novel approach proposed in the Strong Transferable Attacks paper.

Overall, this paper represents an important advance in the field of adversarial machine learning. The USA framework provides a principled way to train models that are more stable and robust, which is a crucial step towards building reliable and trustworthy AI systems. Further research building on this work could lead to even more powerful and versatile techniques for defending against adversarial attacks.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel training framework called Uniformly Stable Algorithms (USA) that aims to improve the stability and generalization of adversarially trained machine learning models. The key idea is to explicitly optimize the model's parameters for uniform stability, which means the model's predictions are robust to small changes in the training data.

The authors provide a strong theoretical foundation for USA, showing that it can achieve better generalization bounds compared to standard adversarial training. They also demonstrate the practical benefits of USA through extensive empirical evaluations, where USA-trained models exhibit improved stability, robustness to a wider range of adversarial attacks, and better generalization performance.

This work represents an important advance in the field of adversarial machine learning, as it introduces a principled approach to building more reliable and trustworthy AI systems. By focusing on uniform stability, the USA framework helps models learn more general patterns rather than just memorizing the training data. Further research building on this foundation could lead to even more powerful techniques for defending against adversarial attacks in a wide range of real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Uniformly Stable Algorithms for Adversarial Training and Beyond
Total Score

0

Uniformly Stable Algorithms for Adversarial Training and Beyond

Jiancong Xiao, Jiawei Zhang, Zhi-Quan Luo, Asuman Ozdaglar

In adversarial machine learning, neural networks suffer from a significant issue known as robust overfitting, where the robust test accuracy decreases over epochs (Rice et al., 2020). Recent research conducted by Xing et al.,2021; Xiao et al., 2022 has focused on studying the uniform stability of adversarial training. Their investigations revealed that SGD-based adversarial training fails to exhibit uniform stability, and the derived stability bounds align with the observed phenomenon of robust overfitting in experiments. This motivates us to develop uniformly stable algorithms specifically tailored for adversarial training. To this aim, we introduce Moreau envelope-$mathcal{A}$, a variant of the Moreau Envelope-type algorithm. We employ a Moreau envelope function to reframe the original problem as a min-min problem, separating the non-strong convexity and non-smoothness of the adversarial loss. Then, this approach alternates between solving the inner and outer minimization problems to achieve uniform stability without incurring additional computational overhead. In practical scenarios, we show the efficacy of ME-$mathcal{A}$ in mitigating the issue of robust overfitting. Beyond its application in adversarial training, this represents a fundamental result in uniform stability analysis, as ME-$mathcal{A}$ is the first algorithm to exhibit uniform stability for weakly-convex, non-smooth problems.

Read more

5/6/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

Stability and Generalization in Free Adversarial Training

Xiwei Cheng, Kexin Fu, Farzan Farnia

While adversarial training methods have resulted in significant improvements in the deep neural nets' robustness against norm-bounded adversarial perturbations, their generalization performance from training samples to test data has been shown to be considerably worse than standard empirical risk minimization methods. Several recent studies seek to connect the generalization behavior of adversarially trained classifiers to various gradient-based min-max optimization algorithms used for their training. In this work, we study the generalization performance of adversarial training methods using the algorithmic stability framework. Specifically, our goal is to compare the generalization performance of the vanilla adversarial training scheme fully optimizing the perturbations at every iteration vs. the free adversarial training simultaneously optimizing the norm-bounded perturbations and classifier parameters. Our proven generalization bounds indicate that the free adversarial training method could enjoy a lower generalization gap between training and test samples due to the simultaneous nature of its min-max optimization algorithm. We perform several numerical experiments to evaluate the generalization performance of vanilla, fast, and free adversarial training methods. Our empirical findings also show the improved generalization performance of the free adversarial training method and further demonstrate that the better generalization result could translate to greater robustness against black-box attack schemes. The code is available at https://github.com/Xiwei-Cheng/Stability_FreeAT.

Read more

4/16/2024

How to beat a Bayesian adversary
Total Score

0

How to beat a Bayesian adversary

Zihan Ding, Kexin Jin, Jonas Latz, Chenguang Liu

Deep neural networks and other modern machine learning models are often susceptible to adversarial attacks. Indeed, an adversary may often be able to change a model's prediction through a small, directed perturbation of the model's input - an issue in safety-critical applications. Adversarially robust machine learning is usually based on a minmax optimisation problem that minimises the machine learning loss under maximisation-based adversarial attacks. In this work, we study adversaries that determine their attack using a Bayesian statistical approach rather than maximisation. The resulting Bayesian adversarial robustness problem is a relaxation of the usual minmax problem. To solve this problem, we propose Abram - a continuous-time particle system that shall approximate the gradient flow corresponding to the underlying learning problem. We show that Abram approximates a McKean-Vlasov process and justify the use of Abram by giving assumptions under which the McKean-Vlasov process finds the minimiser of the Bayesian adversarial robustness problem. We discuss two ways to discretise Abram and show its suitability in benchmark adversarial deep learning experiments.

Read more

7/12/2024

Moreau Envelope for Nonconvex Bi-Level Optimization: A Single-loop and Hessian-free Solution Strategy
Total Score

0

Moreau Envelope for Nonconvex Bi-Level Optimization: A Single-loop and Hessian-free Solution Strategy

Risheng Liu, Zhu Liu, Wei Yao, Shangzhi Zeng, Jin Zhang

This work focuses on addressing two major challenges in the context of large-scale nonconvex Bi-Level Optimization (BLO) problems, which are increasingly applied in machine learning due to their ability to model nested structures. These challenges involve ensuring computational efficiency and providing theoretical guarantees. While recent advances in scalable BLO algorithms have primarily relied on lower-level convexity simplification, our work specifically tackles large-scale BLO problems involving nonconvexity in both the upper and lower levels. We simultaneously address computational and theoretical challenges by introducing an innovative single-loop gradient-based algorithm, utilizing the Moreau envelope-based reformulation, and providing non-asymptotic convergence analysis for general nonconvex BLO problems. Notably, our algorithm relies solely on first-order gradient information, enhancing its practicality and efficiency, especially for large-scale BLO learning tasks. We validate our approach's effectiveness through experiments on various synthetic problems, two typical hyper-parameter learning tasks, and a real-world neural architecture search application, collectively demonstrating its superior performance.

Read more

5/17/2024