How to beat a Bayesian adversary

Read original: arXiv:2407.08678 - Published 7/12/2024 by Zihan Ding, Kexin Jin, Jonas Latz, Chenguang Liu
Total Score

0

How to beat a Bayesian adversary

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores how to create machine learning models that are robust against adversarial attacks, particularly in the context of Bayesian neural networks.
  • The key ideas include a "Bayesian relaxation" of the adversarial robustness problem, as well as techniques like Adaptive Robust Learning using Latent Bernoulli Variables and Uniformly Stable Algorithms for Adversarial Training Beyond.
  • The research aims to develop machine learning models that can maintain high performance even when faced with adversarial examples designed to fool them.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models can be vulnerable to "adversarial attacks" - inputs that are slightly modified to trick the model into making incorrect predictions. This paper explores ways to make these models more robust, so they can maintain accurate performance even when faced with adversarial examples.

The key idea is a "Bayesian relaxation" of the adversarial robustness problem. Rather than trying to perfectly defend against all possible adversarial attacks, the Bayesian approach acknowledges uncertainty and aims to be "good enough" on average. This can lead to more practical and effective defenses.

The paper also discusses techniques like Adaptive Robust Learning using Latent Bernoulli Variables and Uniformly Stable Algorithms for Adversarial Training Beyond. These methods help the model learn to be robust without sacrificing too much of its normal performance.

The overall goal is to create machine learning systems that are reliable and trustworthy, even in the face of adversaries trying to fool them. This is an important challenge as these models become more widely deployed in high-stakes applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a "Bayesian relaxation" of the adversarial robustness problem. Instead of requiring perfect robustness against all possible adversarial examples, the Bayesian approach allows for some uncertainty and aims to maintain good average-case performance.

This is formalized through a Bayesian Neural Networks Min-Max Game Framework. The model tries to learn parameters that maximize its expected performance, while an adversary tries to find inputs that minimize this expected performance.

The paper also introduces two key techniques:

  1. Adaptive Robust Learning using Latent Bernoulli Variables: This adaptively adjusts the model's robustness based on the difficulty of the current input.
  2. Uniformly Stable Algorithms for Adversarial Training Beyond: This ensures the training process is stable and the model remains robust, even as the adversary adapts its attack strategy.

Through experiments, the authors demonstrate that these Bayesian and adaptive techniques can lead to models that are more robust to adversarial attacks, while maintaining high standard performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents promising approaches for improving the adversarial robustness of machine learning models, particularly in the context of Bayesian neural networks. The Bayesian relaxation and adaptive techniques seem like reasonable ways to balance robustness and standard performance.

However, the paper does not fully address the potential limitations of these methods. For example, it's not clear how the Bayesian approach would scale to larger, more complex models, or how sensitive the performance is to the choice of prior distributions.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a relatively narrow set of attack scenarios and datasets. It would be valuable to see how well these techniques generalize to a wider range of adversarial threats and real-world applications.

Further research is also needed to better understand the security guarantees provided by these methods and their robustness to more sophisticated adversarial attacks. As these models are deployed in high-stakes domains, it's crucial to have a thorough understanding of their limitations and failure modes.

Conclusion

This paper presents an interesting Bayesian approach to the problem of adversarial robustness in machine learning. By relaxing the requirement for perfect robustness and incorporating adaptive techniques, the authors demonstrate a path towards more reliable and trustworthy models.

While the techniques show promise, there are still open questions and potential limitations that warrant further investigation. As machine learning becomes more prevalent in high-impact applications, developing robust and secure models will be a critical challenge for the field.

Overall, this research contributes valuable insights and methods to the ongoing effort to make machine learning systems more resistant to adversarial attacks and capable of maintaining reliable performance in the face of uncertainty.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

How to beat a Bayesian adversary
Total Score

0

How to beat a Bayesian adversary

Zihan Ding, Kexin Jin, Jonas Latz, Chenguang Liu

Deep neural networks and other modern machine learning models are often susceptible to adversarial attacks. Indeed, an adversary may often be able to change a model's prediction through a small, directed perturbation of the model's input - an issue in safety-critical applications. Adversarially robust machine learning is usually based on a minmax optimisation problem that minimises the machine learning loss under maximisation-based adversarial attacks. In this work, we study adversaries that determine their attack using a Bayesian statistical approach rather than maximisation. The resulting Bayesian adversarial robustness problem is a relaxation of the usual minmax problem. To solve this problem, we propose Abram - a continuous-time particle system that shall approximate the gradient flow corresponding to the underlying learning problem. We show that Abram approximates a McKean-Vlasov process and justify the use of Abram by giving assumptions under which the McKean-Vlasov process finds the minimiser of the Bayesian adversarial robustness problem. We discuss two ways to discretise Abram and show its suitability in benchmark adversarial deep learning experiments.

Read more

7/12/2024

Attacking Bayes: On the Adversarial Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Attacking Bayes: On the Adversarial Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks

Yunzhen Feng, Tim G. J. Rudner, Nikolaos Tsilivis, Julia Kempe

Adversarial examples have been shown to cause neural networks to fail on a wide range of vision and language tasks, but recent work has claimed that Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) are inherently robust to adversarial perturbations. In this work, we examine this claim. To study the adversarial robustness of BNNs, we investigate whether it is possible to successfully break state-of-the-art BNN inference methods and prediction pipelines using even relatively unsophisticated attacks for three tasks: (1) label prediction under the posterior predictive mean, (2) adversarial example detection with Bayesian predictive uncertainty, and (3) semantic shift detection. We find that BNNs trained with state-of-the-art approximate inference methods, and even BNNs trained with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, are highly susceptible to adversarial attacks. We also identify various conceptual and experimental errors in previous works that claimed inherent adversarial robustness of BNNs and conclusively demonstrate that BNNs and uncertainty-aware Bayesian prediction pipelines are not inherently robust against adversarial attacks.

Read more

5/1/2024

Revisiting Min-Max Optimization Problem in Adversarial Training
Total Score

0

Revisiting Min-Max Optimization Problem in Adversarial Training

Sina Hajer Ahmadi, Hassan Bahrami

The rise of computer vision applications in the real world puts the security of the deep neural networks at risk. Recent works demonstrate that convolutional neural networks are susceptible to adversarial examples - where the input images look similar to the natural images but are classified incorrectly by the model. To provide a rebuttal to this problem, we propose a new method to build robust deep neural networks against adversarial attacks by reformulating the saddle point optimization problem in cite{madry2017towards}. Our proposed method offers significant resistance and a concrete security guarantee against multiple adversaries. The goal of this paper is to act as a stepping stone for a new variation of deep learning models which would lead towards fully robust deep learning models.

Read more

8/22/2024

Adaptive Robust Learning using Latent Bernoulli Variables
Total Score

0

Adaptive Robust Learning using Latent Bernoulli Variables

Aleksandr Karakulev (Uppsala University, Sweden), Dave Zachariah (Uppsala University, Sweden), Prashant Singh (Uppsala University, Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Sweden)

We present an adaptive approach for robust learning from corrupted training sets. We identify corrupted and non-corrupted samples with latent Bernoulli variables and thus formulate the learning problem as maximization of the likelihood where latent variables are marginalized. The resulting problem is solved via variational inference, using an efficient Expectation-Maximization based method. The proposed approach improves over the state-of-the-art by automatically inferring the corruption level, while adding minimal computational overhead. We demonstrate our robust learning method and its parameter-free nature on a wide variety of machine learning tasks including online learning and deep learning where it adapts to different levels of noise and maintains high prediction accuracy.

Read more

6/17/2024