Universal Inference Meets Random Projections: A Scalable Test for Log-concavity
2111.09254
0
0
🤯
Abstract
Shape constraints yield flexible middle grounds between fully nonparametric and fully parametric approaches to modeling distributions of data. The specific assumption of log-concavity is motivated by applications across economics, survival modeling, and reliability theory. However, there do not currently exist valid tests for whether the underlying density of given data is log-concave. The recent universal inference methodology provides a valid test. The universal test relies on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), and efficient methods already exist for finding the log-concave MLE. This yields the first test of log-concavity that is provably valid in finite samples in any dimension, for which we also establish asymptotic consistency results. Empirically, we find that a random projections approach that converts the d-dimensional testing problem into many one-dimensional problems can yield high power, leading to a simple procedure that is statistically and computationally efficient.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new method for testing whether the underlying distribution of a given dataset is log-concave.
- Log-concavity is an important assumption in many applications across economics, survival modeling, and reliability theory.
- However, there have not been valid tests for log-concavity in finite samples until now.
- The authors present a "universal inference" approach that provides a statistically valid test for log-concavity.
- This test is computationally efficient and can be applied in high-dimensional settings.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about a new way to test if the data you're working with follows a particular shape, called "log-concavity." Log-concavity is an important assumption in many real-world applications, like economics and reliability analysis, but until now there hasn't been a good way to check if your data actually has this property.
The authors present a new "universal inference" method that can reliably test for log-concavity, even when working with high-dimensional datasets. This method is based on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), which is a common technique for fitting statistical models to data. The authors show that their test is statistically valid, meaning it won't give you false positive results, and it's also computationally efficient.
One key idea is to use "random projections" to convert the high-dimensional testing problem into a bunch of simpler one-dimensional problems. This makes the testing procedure both statistically and computationally efficient. Overall, the new log-concavity test fills an important gap and provides researchers with a powerful tool for understanding the shape of their data.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a new method for testing whether the underlying density of a given dataset is log-concave. Log-concavity is an important structural assumption that arises in a variety of applications, including economics, survival modeling, and reliability theory.
The authors leverage the "universal inference" framework to construct a provably valid test for log-concavity in finite samples. This test is based on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the log-concave density, for which efficient computational methods already exist. The authors establish both finite-sample validity and asymptotic consistency of their test.
A key innovation is the use of random projections to convert the high-dimensional testing problem into a collection of one-dimensional problems. This "random projections" approach is shown empirically to yield high statistical power, leading to a computationally and statistically efficient testing procedure.
Critical Analysis
The authors make a compelling case for the importance of testing log-concavity, given its widespread applications. Their new "universal inference" approach seems to address a significant gap in the literature, as prior tests for log-concavity have not been valid in finite samples.
One potential limitation is that the paper focuses solely on log-concavity, whereas some applications may require more general shape constraints. It would be interesting to see if the authors' methodology could be extended to test other shape properties, such as unimodality or k-monotonicity.
Additionally, while the random projections approach seems effective empirically, a more thorough theoretical analysis of its statistical properties could strengthen the paper. For example, it would be useful to understand how the number of random projections and the dimensionality of the data affect the power of the test.
Overall, this is an impressive methodological contribution that provides researchers with a powerful new tool for exploring the structure of their data. The authors' careful approach to both statistical validity and computational efficiency makes their log-concavity test a valuable addition to the toolbox of applied data analysts.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new, statistically valid test for log-concavity that can be efficiently applied to high-dimensional datasets. Log-concavity is an important structural assumption in many fields, but until now, there has been a lack of reliable methods for checking this property in practice.
The authors' "universal inference" approach, combined with the use of random projections, provides a computationally efficient and statistically powerful way to test for log-concavity. This work fills an important gap and gives researchers a valuable tool for exploring the distributional properties of their data, with potential applications spanning economics, survival analysis, and reliability engineering.
While the paper is focused on log-concavity, the general principles behind the authors' methodology could potentially be extended to test other shape constraints. Further research in this direction could expand the scope and impact of this work, leading to new insights and discoveries across a wide range of data-driven disciplines.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🗣️
On diffusion-based generative models and their error bounds: The log-concave case with full convergence estimates
Stefano Bruno, Ying Zhang, Dong-Young Lim, Omer Deniz Akyildiz, Sotirios Sabanis
0
0
We provide full theoretical guarantees for the convergence behaviour of diffusion-based generative models under the assumption of strongly log-concave data distributions while our approximating class of functions used for score estimation is made of Lipschitz continuous functions. We demonstrate via a motivating example, sampling from a Gaussian distribution with unknown mean, the powerfulness of our approach. In this case, explicit estimates are provided for the associated optimization problem, i.e. score approximation, while these are combined with the corresponding sampling estimates. As a result, we obtain the best known upper bound estimates in terms of key quantities of interest, such as the dimension and rates of convergence, for the Wasserstein-2 distance between the data distribution (Gaussian with unknown mean) and our sampling algorithm. Beyond the motivating example and in order to allow for the use of a diverse range of stochastic optimizers, we present our results using an $L^2$-accurate score estimation assumption, which crucially is formed under an expectation with respect to the stochastic optimizer and our novel auxiliary process that uses only known information. This approach yields the best known convergence rate for our sampling algorithm.
4/23/2024
✅
Log-Concave Sampling on Compact Supports: A Versatile Proximal Framework
Lu Yu
0
0
In this paper, we explore sampling from strongly log-concave distributions defined on convex and compact supports. We propose a general proximal framework that involves projecting onto the constrained set, which is highly flexible and supports various projection options. Specifically, we consider the cases of Euclidean and Gauge projections, with the latter having the advantage of being performed efficiently using a membership oracle. This framework can be seamlessly integrated with multiple sampling methods. Our analysis focuses on Langevin-type sampling algorithms within the context of constrained sampling. We provide nonasymptotic upper bounds on the W1 and W2 errors, offering a detailed comparison of the performance of these methods in constrained sampling.
5/27/2024
🤯
Convergence of coordinate ascent variational inference for log-concave measures via optimal transport
Manuel Arnese, Daniel Lacker
0
0
Mean field variational inference (VI) is the problem of finding the closest product (factorized) measure, in the sense of relative entropy, to a given high-dimensional probability measure $rho$. The well known Coordinate Ascent Variational Inference (CAVI) algorithm aims to approximate this product measure by iteratively optimizing over one coordinate (factor) at a time, which can be done explicitly. Despite its popularity, the convergence of CAVI remains poorly understood. In this paper, we prove the convergence of CAVI for log-concave densities $rho$. If additionally $log rho$ has Lipschitz gradient, we find a linear rate of convergence, and if also $rho$ is strongly log-concave, we find an exponential rate. Our analysis starts from the observation that mean field VI, while notoriously non-convex in the usual sense, is in fact displacement convex in the sense of optimal transport when $rho$ is log-concave. This allows us to adapt techniques from the optimization literature on coordinate descent algorithms in Euclidean space.
4/16/2024
↗️
On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate and convergence rate under gradient descent for multi-class logistic regression
Dwight Nwaigwe, Marek Rychlik
0
0
We revisit the problem of the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate for multi-class logistic regression. We show that one method of ensuring its existence is by assigning positive probability to every class in the sample dataset. The notion of data separability is not needed, which is in contrast to the classical set up of multi-class logistic regression in which each data sample belongs to one class. We also provide a general and constructive estimate of the convergence rate to the maximum likelihood estimate when gradient descent is used as the optimizer. Our estimate involves bounding the condition number of the Hessian of the maximum likelihood function. The approaches used in this article rely on a simple operator-theoretic framework.
5/9/2024