Unveiling the Decision-Making Process in Reinforcement Learning with Genetic Programming

Read original: arXiv:2407.14714 - Published 7/23/2024 by Manuel Eberhardinger, Florian Rupp, Johannes Maucher, Setareh Maghsudi
Total Score

0

Unveiling the Decision-Making Process in Reinforcement Learning with Genetic Programming

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explains the decision-making process in reinforcement learning using genetic programming
  • Aims to make the model's inner workings more transparent and explainable
  • Involves evolving symbolic policies that can be easily interpreted

Plain English Explanation

This paper explores a technique to make reinforcement learning models more explainable. Reinforcement learning is a type of machine learning where an agent learns to make decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties. However, the inner workings of these models can be opaque, making it difficult to understand why they make certain choices.

The researchers propose using genetic programming to evolve symbolic policies that represent the decision-making process. These policies are essentially mathematical expressions that can be easily interpreted by humans, unlike the black box neural networks typically used in reinforcement learning.

By evolving these symbolic policies, the model's reasoning becomes more transparent. The researchers can analyze the evolved expressions to gain insights into how the agent is making decisions and what factors are influencing its choices. This can help improve the model's performance and make its behavior more predictable and trustworthy.

The paper discusses applying this technique to a reinforcement learning task in a simulated environment. The results show that the symbolic policies can match the performance of neural network policies while providing better interpretability.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework for unveiling the decision-making process in reinforcement learning using genetic programming. The key components are:

  1. Symbolic Policy Representation: Instead of using a neural network to represent the policy, the researchers use a symbolic expression that can be easily interpreted. These expressions are evolved using genetic programming.

  2. Fitness Evaluation: The fitness of each symbolic policy is evaluated by running it in the reinforcement learning environment and measuring its performance (e.g., reward obtained).

  3. Genetic Programming: The symbolic policies are evolved over multiple generations using genetic operators like mutation and crossover. The goal is to find policies that maximize the agent's performance in the environment.

  4. Interpretability Analysis: The evolved symbolic policies are analyzed to understand the decision-making process. The researchers examine the mathematical structure of the expressions and identify the key factors influencing the agent's choices.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach on a simulated reinforcement learning task. The results show that the symbolic policies can match the performance of neural network policies while providing better interpretability and transparency.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to make reinforcement learning models more explainable. The use of genetic programming to evolve symbolic policies is an interesting idea that can help bridge the gap between the model's internal representations and human understanding.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of this approach. For example, the symbolic policies may become overly complex as the task difficulty increases, making them less interpretable. Additionally, the genetic programming process can be computationally expensive, which may limit its scalability to more complex environments.

Further research is needed to explore the boundaries and trade-offs of this approach, such as its performance on more challenging tasks, the impact of policy complexity on interpretability, and ways to improve the efficiency of the genetic programming process.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to making reinforcement learning models more explainable by using genetic programming to evolve symbolic policies. The key idea is to represent the agent's decision-making process as a mathematical expression that can be easily interpreted, rather than using a black box neural network.

The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to provide better transparency and insights into how reinforcement learning agents make decisions. By unveiling the decision-making process, this technique can help improve the performance, reliability, and trustworthiness of reinforcement learning systems, with applications in fields like robotics, autonomous vehicles, and decision support systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Unveiling the Decision-Making Process in Reinforcement Learning with Genetic Programming
Total Score

0

Unveiling the Decision-Making Process in Reinforcement Learning with Genetic Programming

Manuel Eberhardinger, Florian Rupp, Johannes Maucher, Setareh Maghsudi

Despite tremendous progress, machine learning and deep learning still suffer from incomprehensible predictions. Incomprehensibility, however, is not an option for the use of (deep) reinforcement learning in the real world, as unpredictable actions can seriously harm the involved individuals. In this work, we propose a genetic programming framework to generate explanations for the decision-making process of already trained agents by imitating them with programs. Programs are interpretable and can be executed to generate explanations of why the agent chooses a particular action. Furthermore, we conduct an ablation study that investigates how extending the domain-specific language by using library learning alters the performance of the method. We compare our results with the previous state of the art for this problem and show that we are comparable in performance but require much less hardware resources and computation time.

Read more

7/23/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Revolutionizing Genomics with Reinforcement Learning Techniques

M. Keramy, K. Jahanian, R. Sani, A. Agha, I. Dehzangy, M. Yan, H. Rokni

In recent years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for solving a wide range of problems, including medical decision-making. The exponential growth of medical data over the past two decades has surpassed the capacity for manual analysis, prompting increased interest in automated data analysis and processing. ML algorithms, capable of learning from data with minimal human intervention, are particularly well-suited for medical data analysis and interpretation. One significant advantage of ML is the reduced cost of collecting labeled training data necessary for supervised learning. While numerous studies have explored the applications of ML in medicine, this survey specifically focuses on the use of ML across various medical research fields. We provide a comprehensive technical overview of existing studies on ML applications in medicine, highlighting the strengths and limitations of these approaches. Additionally, we discuss potential research directions for future exploration. These include the development of more sophisticated reward functions, as the accuracy of the reward function is crucial for ML performance, the integration of ML with other techniques, and the application of ML to new and emerging areas in genomics research. Finally, we summarize our findings and present the current state of the field and the future outlook for ML in medical application.

Read more

7/31/2024

Instruction Following with Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning in Virtual Environments
Total Score

0

Instruction Following with Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning in Virtual Environments

Zoya Volovikova, Alexey Skrynnik, Petr Kuderov, Aleksandr I. Panov

In this study, we address the issue of enabling an artificial intelligence agent to execute complex language instructions within virtual environments. In our framework, we assume that these instructions involve intricate linguistic structures and multiple interdependent tasks that must be navigated successfully to achieve the desired outcomes. To effectively manage these complexities, we propose a hierarchical framework that combines the deep language comprehension of large language models with the adaptive action-execution capabilities of reinforcement learning agents. The language module (based on LLM) translates the language instruction into a high-level action plan, which is then executed by a pre-trained reinforcement learning agent. We have demonstrated the effectiveness of our approach in two different environments: in IGLU, where agents are instructed to build structures, and in Crafter, where agents perform tasks and interact with objects in the surrounding environment according to language commands.

Read more

7/15/2024

Breeding Programs Optimization with Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Breeding Programs Optimization with Reinforcement Learning

Omar G. Younis, Luca Corinzia, Ioannis N. Athanasiadis, Andreas Krause, Joachim M. Buhmann, Matteo Turchetta

Crop breeding is crucial in improving agricultural productivity while potentially decreasing land usage, greenhouse gas emissions, and water consumption. However, breeding programs are challenging due to long turnover times, high-dimensional decision spaces, long-term objectives, and the need to adapt to rapid climate change. This paper introduces the use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) to optimize simulated crop breeding programs. RL agents are trained to make optimal crop selection and cross-breeding decisions based on genetic information. To benchmark RL-based breeding algorithms, we introduce a suite of Gym environments. The study demonstrates the superiority of RL techniques over standard practices in terms of genetic gain when simulated in silico using real-world genomic maize data.

Read more

6/7/2024