Discovering Dynamic Symbolic Policies with Genetic Programming
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach to discovering dynamic symbolic policies using genetic programming.
- The researchers develop a framework that combines generative and logic-based methods to explore mathematical expressions and generate programs that solve complex tasks.
- The paper showcases the potential of this approach through several case studies, including automated discovery of symbolic laws governing skill acquisition and neural-guided dynamic symbolic networks for exploring mathematical equations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper proposes a new way to automatically create mathematical rules or "policies" that can solve complex problems. The researchers use a technique called genetic programming, which is similar to how biological evolution works. They start with a population of simple mathematical expressions and then repeatedly modify and combine them, keeping the ones that perform best on the problem at hand.
This allows the system to gradually evolve more and more sophisticated policies over time. For example, the researchers showed how they could use this approach to discover the symbolic laws that govern how people learn new skills. They also demonstrated how it could be used to explore mathematical equations in a more flexible and dynamic way, guided by neural networks.
The key advantage of this approach is that it can generate policies that are interpretable and easy for humans to understand, unlike many black-box machine learning models. This could make the policies more useful in real-world applications where transparency and explainability are important.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework that combines generative and logic-based methods to discover dynamic symbolic policies using genetic programming. The researchers start by defining a domain-specific language (DSL) that can represent the policies as mathematical expressions.
They then use genetic programming to evolve a population of these expressions, applying mutation and crossover operators to generate new candidates. The fitness of each expression is evaluated based on how well it solves the target task, and the best-performing individuals are selected to produce the next generation.
Through this iterative process, the system is able to gradually discover more complex and effective policies. The researchers demonstrate the capabilities of this approach through several case studies, including automated discovery of symbolic laws governing skill acquisition and neural-guided dynamic symbolic networks for exploring mathematical equations.
One key aspect of the framework is its ability to generate interpretable policies, unlike many black-box machine learning models. This makes the policies more transparent and easier for humans to understand and reason about, which could be particularly important in real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to discovering dynamic symbolic policies, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the researchers note that the performance of the genetic programming algorithm can be sensitive to the choice of the DSL and the fitness function, and that more work is needed to make the system more robust and scalable.
Additionally, while the case studies demonstrate the potential of the approach, they are relatively narrow in scope. Further research would be needed to assess the broader applicability of the framework and its ability to handle more complex or open-ended problems.
It would also be interesting to explore ways to combine the symbolic reasoning capabilities of this approach with the representational power of neural networks, potentially leading to even more powerful and flexible AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to discovering dynamic symbolic policies using genetic programming. By combining generative and logic-based methods, the researchers have developed a framework that can gradually evolve interpretable and effective policies for solving complex tasks.
The case studies showcased in the paper demonstrate the potential of this approach, particularly in domains where transparency and explainability are important. While the framework has some limitations, it represents an exciting step forward in the broader field of symbolic AI and could inspire further research in this direction.
Overall, the paper offers a compelling vision for how AI systems can be designed to be more interpretable, flexible, and capable of solving a wide range of real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Discovering Dynamic Symbolic Policies with Genetic Programming
Sigur de Vries, Sander Keemink, Marcel van Gerven
Artificial intelligence techniques are increasingly being applied to solve control problems, but often rely on black-box methods without transparent output generation. To improve the interpretability and transparency in control systems, models can be defined as white-box symbolic policies described by mathematical expressions. While current approaches to learn symbolic policies focus on static policies that directly map observations to control signals, these may fail in partially observable and volatile environments. We instead consider dynamic symbolic policies with memory, optimised with genetic programming. The resulting policies are robust, and consist of easy to interpret coupled differential equations. Our results show that dynamic symbolic policies compare with black-box policies on a variety of control tasks. Furthermore, the benefit of the memory in dynamic policies is demonstrated on experiments where static policies fall short. Overall, we present a method for evolving high-performing symbolic policies that offer interpretability and transparency, which lacks in black-box models.
Read more9/11/2024
↗️
0
The Inefficiency of Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression -- Extended Version
Gabriel Kronberger, Fabricio Olivetti de Franca, Harry Desmond, Deaglan J. Bartlett, Lukas Kammerer
We analyse the search behaviour of genetic programming for symbolic regression in practically relevant but limited settings, allowing exhaustive enumeration of all solutions. This enables us to quantify the success probability of finding the best possible expressions, and to compare the search efficiency of genetic programming to random search in the space of semantically unique expressions. This analysis is made possible by improved algorithms for equality saturation, which we use to improve the Exhaustive Symbolic Regression algorithm; this produces the set of semantically unique expression structures, orders of magnitude smaller than the full symbolic regression search space. We compare the efficiency of random search in the set of unique expressions and genetic programming. For our experiments we use two real-world datasets where symbolic regression has been used to produce well-fitting univariate expressions: the Nikuradse dataset of flow in rough pipes and the Radial Acceleration Relation of galaxy dynamics. The results show that genetic programming in such limited settings explores only a small fraction of all unique expressions, and evaluates expressions repeatedly that are congruent to already visited expressions.
Read more4/29/2024
↗️
0
A Comparison of Recent Algorithms for Symbolic Regression to Genetic Programming
Yousef A. Radwan, Gabriel Kronberger, Stephan Winkler
Symbolic regression is a machine learning method with the goal to produce interpretable results. Unlike other machine learning methods such as, e.g. random forests or neural networks, which are opaque, symbolic regression aims to model and map data in a way that can be understood by scientists. Recent advancements, have attempted to bridge the gap between these two fields; new methodologies attempt to fuse the mapping power of neural networks and deep learning techniques with the explanatory power of symbolic regression. In this paper, we examine these new emerging systems and test the performance of an end-to-end transformer model for symbolic regression versus the reigning traditional methods based on genetic programming that have spearheaded symbolic regression throughout the years. We compare these systems on novel datasets to avoid bias to older methods who were improved on well-known benchmark datasets. Our results show that traditional GP methods as implemented e.g., by Operon still remain superior to two recently published symbolic regression methods.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Model-based Policy Optimization using Symbolic World Model
Andrey Gorodetskiy, Konstantin Mironov, Aleksandr Panov
The application of learning-based control methods in robotics presents significant challenges. One is that model-free reinforcement learning algorithms use observation data with low sample efficiency. To address this challenge, a prevalent approach is model-based reinforcement learning, which involves employing an environment dynamics model. We suggest approximating transition dynamics with symbolic expressions, which are generated via symbolic regression. Approximation of a mechanical system with a symbolic model has fewer parameters than approximation with neural networks, which can potentially lead to higher accuracy and quality of extrapolation. We use a symbolic dynamics model to generate trajectories in model-based policy optimization to improve the sample efficiency of the learning algorithm. We evaluate our approach across various tasks within simulated environments. Our method demonstrates superior sample efficiency in these tasks compared to model-free and model-based baseline methods.
Read more7/19/2024