Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Models: A Survey from Detection to Remediation
2406.14644
0
0
Abstract
Data contamination has garnered increased attention in the era of large language models (LLMs) due to the reliance on extensive internet-derived training corpora. The issue of training corpus overlap with evaluation benchmarks--referred to as contamination--has been the focus of significant recent research. This body of work aims to identify contamination, understand its impacts, and explore mitigation strategies from diverse perspectives. However, comprehensive studies that provide a clear pathway from foundational concepts to advanced insights are lacking in this nascent field. Therefore, we present a comprehensive survey in the field of data contamination, laying out the key issues, methodologies, and findings to date, and highlighting areas in need of further research and development. In particular, we begin by examining the effects of data contamination across various stages and forms. We then provide a detailed analysis of current contamination detection methods, categorizing them to highlight their focus, assumptions, strengths, and limitations. We also discuss mitigation strategies, offering a clear guide for future research. This survey serves as a succinct overview of the most recent advancements in data contamination research, providing a straightforward guide for the benefit of future research endeavors.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of data contamination in language models, covering the detection and remediation of this issue.
- It explores the spectrum of data contamination, including how it can cross language barriers, the impact on model generalization and trustworthy evaluation, and the prevalence in large language model benchmarks.
- The paper also investigates techniques for probing language models to detect data contamination in the pre-training data.
Plain English Explanation
Language models are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but they can also pick up on biases or errors in the data they are trained on. This is known as "data contamination," and it can have significant impacts on the models' performance and reliability.
The paper explores the many ways data contamination can manifest in language models, from affecting their ability to generalize to new tasks, to undermining the trustworthiness of model evaluations. For example, the research shows how data contamination can lead to models memorizing specific examples rather than learning general patterns, making it difficult to assess their true capabilities.
The paper also delves into the prevalence of data contamination in popular language model benchmarks, highlighting the need for more rigorous testing and evaluation methods. Additionally, the study explores techniques for probing language models to detect data contamination in the data used to train them.
Overall, this comprehensive survey sheds light on a critical issue in the development of reliable and trustworthy language models, and provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working in this field.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on the concept of data contamination in language models, explaining how it can arise from various sources, such as biases in the training data or errors introduced during data collection and processing.
The authors then delve into the specific ways data contamination can manifest in language models. They discuss how it can cross language barriers, affecting models trained on data from different languages. They also explore the impact of data contamination on model generalization and trustworthy evaluation, showing how it can lead to models memorizing specific examples rather than learning general patterns.
The paper also examines the prevalence of data contamination in popular language model benchmarks, highlighting the need for more robust evaluation methods. The researchers investigate techniques for probing language models to detect data contamination in the pre-training data, with the goal of developing better methods for identifying and mitigating this issue.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched overview of the data contamination issue in language models, highlighting the various ways it can manifest and the significant impact it can have on model performance and reliability.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on the detection and characterization of data contamination, rather than providing in-depth solutions for remediation. While the paper does touch on some potential mitigation strategies, more detailed investigation into effective remediation techniques could be valuable for the field.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential societal implications of data contamination in language models, such as the propagation of biases or the spread of misinformation. Considering these broader impacts could be an important area for future research.
Overall, this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in the language modeling field, raising awareness of the data contamination issue and providing a solid foundation for further exploration and development of solutions.
Conclusion
This comprehensive survey paper delves into the spectrum of data contamination in language models, shedding light on the various ways it can manifest and the significant challenges it poses for the development of reliable and trustworthy AI systems.
The research highlights the need for more rigorous testing and evaluation methods to detect and mitigate data contamination, as well as the importance of probing language models to identify the sources of this issue in the pre-training data. By addressing these challenges, the language modeling community can work towards creating models that are more accurate, unbiased, and beneficial to society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Data Contamination Can Cross Language Barriers
Feng Yao, Yufan Zhuang, Zihao Sun, Sunan Xu, Animesh Kumar, Jingbo Shang
0
0
The opacity in developing large language models (LLMs) is raising growing concerns about the potential contamination of public benchmarks in the pre-training data. Existing contamination detection methods are typically based on the text overlap between training and evaluation data, which can be too superficial to reflect deeper forms of contamination. In this paper, we first present a cross-lingual form of contamination that inflates LLMs' performance while evading current detection methods, deliberately injected by overfitting LLMs on the translated versions of benchmark test sets. Then, we propose generalization-based approaches to unmask such deeply concealed contamination. Specifically, we examine the LLM's performance change after modifying the original benchmark by replacing the false answer choices with correct ones from other questions. Contaminated models can hardly generalize to such easier situations, where the false choices can be emph{not even wrong}, as all choices are correct in their memorization. Experimental results demonstrate that cross-lingual contamination can easily fool existing detection methods, but not ours. In addition, we discuss the potential utilization of cross-lingual contamination in interpreting LLMs' working mechanisms and in post-training LLMs for enhanced multilingual capabilities. The code and dataset we use can be obtained from url{https://github.com/ShangDataLab/Deep-Contam}.
6/21/2024
Generalization or Memorization: Data Contamination and Trustworthy Evaluation for Large Language Models
Yihong Dong, Xue Jiang, Huanyu Liu, Zhi Jin, Bin Gu, Mengfei Yang, Ge Li
0
0
Recent statements about the impressive capabilities of large language models (LLMs) are usually supported by evaluating on open-access benchmarks. Considering the vast size and wide-ranging sources of LLMs' training data, it could explicitly or implicitly include test data, leading to LLMs being more susceptible to data contamination. However, due to the opacity of training data, the black-box access of models, and the rapid growth of synthetic training data, detecting and mitigating data contamination for LLMs faces significant challenges. In this paper, we propose CDD, which stands for Contamination Detection via output Distribution for LLMs. CDD necessitates only the sampled texts to detect data contamination, by identifying the peakedness of LLM's output distribution. To mitigate the impact of data contamination in evaluation, we also present TED: Trustworthy Evaluation via output Distribution, based on the correction of LLM's output distribution. To facilitate this study, we introduce two benchmarks, i.e., DetCon and ComiEval, for data contamination detection and contamination mitigation evaluation tasks. Extensive experimental results show that CDD achieves the average relative improvements of 21.8%-30.2% over other contamination detection approaches in terms of Accuracy, F1 Score, and AUC metrics, and can effectively detect implicit contamination. TED substantially mitigates performance improvements up to 66.9% attributed to data contamination across various contamination setups. In real-world applications, we reveal that ChatGPT exhibits a high potential to suffer from data contamination on HumanEval benchmark.
6/3/2024
Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Survey
Cheng Xu, Shuhao Guan, Derek Greene, M-Tahar Kechadi
0
0
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, Claude-3, and Gemini has transformed the field of natural language processing. However, it has also resulted in a significant issue known as Benchmark Data Contamination (BDC). This occurs when language models inadvertently incorporate evaluation benchmark information from their training data, leading to inaccurate or unreliable performance during the evaluation phase of the process. This paper reviews the complex challenge of BDC in LLM evaluation and explores alternative assessment methods to mitigate the risks associated with traditional benchmarks. The paper also examines challenges and future directions in mitigating BDC risks, highlighting the complexity of the issue and the need for innovative solutions to ensure the reliability of LLM evaluation in real-world applications.
6/7/2024
š
Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Models
Chunyuan Deng, Yilun Zhao, Xiangru Tang, Mark Gerstein, Arman Cohan
0
0
Recent observations have underscored a disparity between the inflated benchmark scores and the actual performance of LLMs, raising concerns about potential contamination of evaluation benchmarks. This issue is especially critical for closed-source models and certain open-source models where training data transparency is lacking. In this paper we study data contamination by proposing two methods tailored for both open-source and proprietary LLMs. We first introduce a retrieval-based system to explore potential overlaps between evaluation benchmarks and pretraining corpora. We further present a novel investigation protocol named textbf{T}estset textbf{S}lot Guessing (textit{TS-Guessing}), applicable to both open and proprietary models. This approach entails masking a wrong answer in a multiple-choice question and prompting the model to fill in the gap. Additionally, it involves obscuring an unlikely word in an evaluation example and asking the model to produce it. We find that certain commercial LLMs could surprisingly guess the missing option in various test sets. Specifically, in the TruthfulQA benchmark, we find that LLMs exhibit notable performance improvement when provided with additional metadata in the benchmark. Further, in the MMLU benchmark, ChatGPT and GPT-4 demonstrated an exact match rate of 52% and 57%, respectively, in guessing the missing options in benchmark test data. We hope these results underscore the need for more robust evaluation methodologies and benchmarks in the field.
4/5/2024