Data Contamination Can Cross Language Barriers
2406.13236
0
0
Abstract
The opacity in developing large language models (LLMs) is raising growing concerns about the potential contamination of public benchmarks in the pre-training data. Existing contamination detection methods are typically based on the text overlap between training and evaluation data, which can be too superficial to reflect deeper forms of contamination. In this paper, we first present a cross-lingual form of contamination that inflates LLMs' performance while evading current detection methods, deliberately injected by overfitting LLMs on the translated versions of benchmark test sets. Then, we propose generalization-based approaches to unmask such deeply concealed contamination. Specifically, we examine the LLM's performance change after modifying the original benchmark by replacing the false answer choices with correct ones from other questions. Contaminated models can hardly generalize to such easier situations, where the false choices can be emph{not even wrong}, as all choices are correct in their memorization. Experimental results demonstrate that cross-lingual contamination can easily fool existing detection methods, but not ours. In addition, we discuss the potential utilization of cross-lingual contamination in interpreting LLMs' working mechanisms and in post-training LLMs for enhanced multilingual capabilities. The code and dataset we use can be obtained from url{https://github.com/ShangDataLab/Deep-Contam}.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how data contamination can affect the performance and generalization of large language models (LLMs) across different languages.
- The researchers explore how issues like dataset overlap and model leakage can lead to optimistic performance estimates and undermine the reliability of common AI benchmarks.
- They present several case studies demonstrating how these problems can manifest in real-world scenarios, with a focus on multilingual LLM evaluation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how data contamination can impact the development and testing of large language models, particularly when working with multiple languages.
Data contamination refers to issues like dataset overlap, where the training and evaluation data share content, or model leakage, where the model has somehow "memorized" information from the test data during training. These problems can lead to overly optimistic performance results that don't reflect the model's true capabilities.
The researchers provide case studies showing how data contamination can arise in real-world settings, such as when evaluating multilingual language models. They demonstrate how these issues can undermine the reliability of common AI benchmarks and call into question the generalization abilities of the models being tested.
The key insight is that data contamination can cross language barriers, meaning that problems in one language can spill over and affect the model's performance in other languages as well. This highlights the importance of careful data curation and evaluation practices when working with large, multilingual language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the problem of data contamination in the context of large language model (LLM) evaluation, with a particular focus on the multilingual setting.
The researchers first provide a detailed overview of the different types of data contamination that can arise, including dataset overlap, model leakage, and other forms of information "bleed-through" between the training and evaluation data. They explain how these issues can lead to overly optimistic performance estimates and undermine the reliability of common AI benchmarks.
Through a series of case studies, the authors then demonstrate how data contamination can manifest in real-world scenarios, particularly when evaluating the performance of multilingual LLMs. They show how issues like translating training data or sharing text across languages can introduce subtle forms of contamination that are often difficult to detect.
The paper also explores the implications of these findings, highlighting how data contamination can call into question the true generalization abilities of the models being tested. The researchers argue that these issues are especially problematic for multilingual LLMs, as data contamination can easily cross language boundaries.
To address these challenges, the authors propose a set of best practices for careful data curation and evaluation, emphasizing the need for diligent data sanitization and the development of more robust evaluation protocols.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling and thorough analysis of the data contamination problem, highlighting its significant implications for the reliability and trustworthiness of AI benchmarks, particularly in the context of multilingual language models.
One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on a relatively small number of case studies to illustrate the problem. While the examples are well-chosen and effectively demonstrate the core issues, a broader survey of data contamination scenarios across a wider range of languages and domains could further strengthen the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into potential solutions beyond the high-level recommendations for improved data curation and evaluation practices. A more comprehensive discussion of specific technical approaches or system-level interventions to mitigate data contamination could provide valuable guidance for AI practitioners and researchers.
Nevertheless, the paper makes a strong case for the importance of this issue and the urgent need for the AI community to address it. By raising awareness of the ways in which data contamination can cross language barriers and undermine the validity of common benchmarks, the authors contribute a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to ensure the trustworthiness and reliability of large language models and other AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the problem of data contamination in the context of large language model evaluation, with a particular focus on the multilingual setting. The researchers demonstrate how issues like dataset overlap and model leakage can lead to overly optimistic performance estimates and undermine the reliability of common AI benchmarks.
The key insight is that data contamination can cross language barriers, meaning that problems in one language can spill over and affect the model's performance in other languages as well. This highlights the importance of careful data curation and evaluation practices when working with large, multilingual language models.
The paper's findings have significant implications for the development and deployment of trustworthy AI systems, as they challenge the reliability of common benchmarks and call into question the true generalization abilities of the models being tested. By raising awareness of these issues, the authors contribute to the ongoing efforts to ensure the reliability and transparency of large language models and other AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Models: A Survey from Detection to Remediation
Chunyuan Deng, Yilun Zhao, Yuzhao Heng, Yitong Li, Jiannan Cao, Xiangru Tang, Arman Cohan
0
0
Data contamination has garnered increased attention in the era of large language models (LLMs) due to the reliance on extensive internet-derived training corpora. The issue of training corpus overlap with evaluation benchmarks--referred to as contamination--has been the focus of significant recent research. This body of work aims to identify contamination, understand its impacts, and explore mitigation strategies from diverse perspectives. However, comprehensive studies that provide a clear pathway from foundational concepts to advanced insights are lacking in this nascent field. Therefore, we present a comprehensive survey in the field of data contamination, laying out the key issues, methodologies, and findings to date, and highlighting areas in need of further research and development. In particular, we begin by examining the effects of data contamination across various stages and forms. We then provide a detailed analysis of current contamination detection methods, categorizing them to highlight their focus, assumptions, strengths, and limitations. We also discuss mitigation strategies, offering a clear guide for future research. This survey serves as a succinct overview of the most recent advancements in data contamination research, providing a straightforward guide for the benefit of future research endeavors.
6/24/2024
Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Survey
Cheng Xu, Shuhao Guan, Derek Greene, M-Tahar Kechadi
0
0
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, Claude-3, and Gemini has transformed the field of natural language processing. However, it has also resulted in a significant issue known as Benchmark Data Contamination (BDC). This occurs when language models inadvertently incorporate evaluation benchmark information from their training data, leading to inaccurate or unreliable performance during the evaluation phase of the process. This paper reviews the complex challenge of BDC in LLM evaluation and explores alternative assessment methods to mitigate the risks associated with traditional benchmarks. The paper also examines challenges and future directions in mitigating BDC risks, highlighting the complexity of the issue and the need for innovative solutions to ensure the reliability of LLM evaluation in real-world applications.
6/7/2024
š
Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Models
Chunyuan Deng, Yilun Zhao, Xiangru Tang, Mark Gerstein, Arman Cohan
0
0
Recent observations have underscored a disparity between the inflated benchmark scores and the actual performance of LLMs, raising concerns about potential contamination of evaluation benchmarks. This issue is especially critical for closed-source models and certain open-source models where training data transparency is lacking. In this paper we study data contamination by proposing two methods tailored for both open-source and proprietary LLMs. We first introduce a retrieval-based system to explore potential overlaps between evaluation benchmarks and pretraining corpora. We further present a novel investigation protocol named textbf{T}estset textbf{S}lot Guessing (textit{TS-Guessing}), applicable to both open and proprietary models. This approach entails masking a wrong answer in a multiple-choice question and prompting the model to fill in the gap. Additionally, it involves obscuring an unlikely word in an evaluation example and asking the model to produce it. We find that certain commercial LLMs could surprisingly guess the missing option in various test sets. Specifically, in the TruthfulQA benchmark, we find that LLMs exhibit notable performance improvement when provided with additional metadata in the benchmark. Further, in the MMLU benchmark, ChatGPT and GPT-4 demonstrated an exact match rate of 52% and 57%, respectively, in guessing the missing options in benchmark test data. We hope these results underscore the need for more robust evaluation methodologies and benchmarks in the field.
4/5/2024
Generalization or Memorization: Data Contamination and Trustworthy Evaluation for Large Language Models
Yihong Dong, Xue Jiang, Huanyu Liu, Zhi Jin, Bin Gu, Mengfei Yang, Ge Li
0
0
Recent statements about the impressive capabilities of large language models (LLMs) are usually supported by evaluating on open-access benchmarks. Considering the vast size and wide-ranging sources of LLMs' training data, it could explicitly or implicitly include test data, leading to LLMs being more susceptible to data contamination. However, due to the opacity of training data, the black-box access of models, and the rapid growth of synthetic training data, detecting and mitigating data contamination for LLMs faces significant challenges. In this paper, we propose CDD, which stands for Contamination Detection via output Distribution for LLMs. CDD necessitates only the sampled texts to detect data contamination, by identifying the peakedness of LLM's output distribution. To mitigate the impact of data contamination in evaluation, we also present TED: Trustworthy Evaluation via output Distribution, based on the correction of LLM's output distribution. To facilitate this study, we introduce two benchmarks, i.e., DetCon and ComiEval, for data contamination detection and contamination mitigation evaluation tasks. Extensive experimental results show that CDD achieves the average relative improvements of 21.8%-30.2% over other contamination detection approaches in terms of Accuracy, F1 Score, and AUC metrics, and can effectively detect implicit contamination. TED substantially mitigates performance improvements up to 66.9% attributed to data contamination across various contamination setups. In real-world applications, we reveal that ChatGPT exhibits a high potential to suffer from data contamination on HumanEval benchmark.
6/3/2024