Usability of back support, shoulder support and sit-stand passive occupational exoskeletons: A heuristic evaluation of the designs
0
🤔
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Exoskeletons are wearable devices that can assist industrial workers and reduce musculoskeletal injuries.
- The usability of exoskeletons, including during assembly, donning, doffing, and disassembly, is crucial but not well-studied.
- This paper evaluates the usability of three popular exoskeletons using Nielsen and Shneiderman's heuristics.
Plain English Explanation
Exoskeletons are wearable robotic devices that can help support and strengthen a person's movements. They are being developed to assist industrial workers and reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injuries. However, the ease of use, or "usability," of these exoskeletons is important and not well-understood yet.
This study looked at the usability of three different exoskeletons - a back support device, a shoulder support device, and a sit-stand exoskeleton. The researchers had seven evaluators use established usability principles (called "heuristics") to assess how easy these exoskeletons are to assemble, put on, take off, and disassemble.
The results showed that none of the three exoskeletons had any "catastrophic" usability problems, meaning they weren't completely unusable. However, all three had significant usability issues, such as:
- Difficulty accommodating users of diverse sizes and abilities
- Requiring two people to put the exoskeleton on and take it off
- Lacking clear instructions and sequence indicators during assembly
- Posing safety hazards when donning and doffing
- Requiring substantial manual strength to use
The assembly task was found to be the most difficult part, with the most usability problems identified. The researchers recommend that exoskeleton designers involve a diverse group of users in their evaluation and testing to improve the usability, accessibility, and safety of these devices.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a heuristic evaluation of three popular occupational exoskeletons: a back support device, a shoulder support device, and a sit-stand exoskeleton. They wanted to assess the usability of these devices, particularly during the tasks of assembling, donning, doffing, and disassembling them.
Seven evaluators used Nielsen and Shneiderman's well-established usability heuristics to assess the exoskeletons. These heuristics cover principles like visibility of system status, match between system and the real world, user control and freedom, and error prevention.
The results showed that while none of the exoskeletons had any "catastrophic" usability issues, all three had significant usability problems. These included:
- Difficulty accommodating users of diverse sizes and abilities
- Assembly, donning, and doffing requiring the assistance of a second person
- Lack of clear documentation and sequence indicators during assembly
- Presence of safety hazards when donning and doffing the devices
- High manual strength requirements to use the exoskeletons
Importantly, the assembly task was found to be the most problematic, with the most violations of usability heuristics identified.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge some limitations of their study. They note that the evaluation was conducted in a controlled lab environment, and real-world usage may uncover additional usability issues. The sample size of seven evaluators is also relatively small.
Additionally, the study did not assess the actual task performance or user experience when using the exoskeletons for their intended industrial applications. The usability issues identified may have different impacts on worker productivity, safety, and acceptance in practice.
Further research could explore the usability of exoskeletons in more diverse user populations, including workers with pre-existing medical conditions or physical limitations. Longitudinal studies monitoring long-term use could also provide valuable insights.
Overall, this study highlights the importance of comprehensive usability evaluations for emerging exoskeleton technologies. By identifying key design flaws, the research can inform future iterations and help ensure these devices are truly user-friendly and accessible for industrial workers.
Conclusion
This study provides important insights into the usability challenges of current occupational exoskeleton designs. While these devices hold promise for alleviating musculoskeletal injuries, the researchers found significant issues with accommodating diverse users, the complexity of assembly and donning/doffing, and potential safety hazards.
To address these shortcomings, the exoskeleton research community is encouraged to involve a wider range of users in their evaluations and to conduct more thorough usability, accessibility, and safety assessments. Incorporating this feedback can help exoskeleton designers improve the user experience and ultimately increase the adoption and effectiveness of these assistive technologies in industrial settings.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
0
Usability of back support, shoulder support and sit-stand passive occupational exoskeletons: A heuristic evaluation of the designs
Alejandra Martinez, Laura Tovar, Carla Irigoyen Amparan, Karen Gonzalez, Prajina Edayath, Priyadarshini Pennathur, Arunkumar Pennathur
Occupational exoskeletons promise to alleviate musculoskeletal injuries among industrial workers. Knowledge of the usability of the exoskeleton designs with respect to the user device interaction points, and the problems in design features, functions and parts, evaluated and rated using design principles is still limited. Further, the usability of exoskeletons when assembling, donning, doffing and disassembling them, tasks that can be considered pre and post use tasks are also critical to evaluate, especially from a device design standpoint. We conducted a heuristic evaluation of the usability of three popular exoskeletons, a back support device, a shoulder support device, and a sit stand exoskeleton when assembling, donning, doffing and disassembling them. Seven evaluators used Nielsen and Shneiderman usability heuristics to evaluate the devices. Results indicate that none of the three exoskeletons had any catastrophic usability problems, but all three had major usability problems including accommodating diverse users, the assembly, donning and doffing being a two person operation, poor documentation, a lack of sequence indicators during assembly of the devices, presence of safety hazards while donning and doffing the devices, and manual strength requirements. Further, the assembly task is the most difficult task resulting in the most violations of usability heuristics. The exoskeleton human factors research community should include diverse users in their evaluations and conduct usability, accessibility, and safety evaluations of these devices to provide design feedback to device designers.
Read more8/7/2024
📉
0
Heuristic evaluations of back support, shoulder support, hand grip strength support, and sit-stand support exoskeletons using universal design principles
Alejandra Martinez, Laura Tovar, Carla Irigoyen Amparan, Karen Gonzalez, Prajina Edayath, Priyadarshini Pennathur, Arunkumar Pennathur
Occupational exoskeletons promise to reduce the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries; however, we do not know if their designs allow universal use by all workers. We also do not know how easy the tasks of assembling, donning, doffing, and disassembling exoskeletons are. The purpose of our study was to heuristically evaluate a back support, a shoulder support, a handgrip strength support, and a sit-stand exoskeleton for how well they are designed for universal use when assembling, donning, doffing, and disassembling the exoskeleton. Seven evaluators used universal design principles and associated criteria to independently evaluate and rate four exoskeletons when assembling, donning, doffing, and disassembling the devices. The rating scale was a Likert-type scale, where a rating of 1 represented not at all, and a rating of 5 represented an excellent design with respect to the universal design criteria for the task. The results indicate that providing perceptible information to the user, making the design equitable to use for a diverse set of users, making the design simple and intuitive to use with adequate feedback, and designing to prevent user errors, and when errors are made, allowing the user to recover quickly from the errors, were rated poorly. Assembling and donning tasks presented the most challenges.
Read more6/3/2024
0
User-centered evaluation of the Wearable Walker lower limb exoskeleton, preliminary assessment based on the Experience protocol
Cristian Camardella, Vittorio Lippi, Francesco Porcini, Giulia Bassani, Lucia Lencioni, Christoph Mauer, Christian Haverkamp, Carlo Alberto Avizzano, Antonio Frisoli, Alessandro Filippeschi
Using lower-limbs exoskeletons provides potential advantages in terms of productivity and safety associated with reduced stress. However, complex issues in human-robot interaction are still open, such as the physiological effects of exoskeletons and the impact on the user's subjective experience. In this work, an innovative exoskeleton, the Wearable Walker, is assessed using the EXPERIENCE benchmarking protocol from the EUROBENCH project. The Wearable Walker is a lower-limb exoskeleton that enhances human abilities, such as carrying loads. The device uses a unique control approach called Blend Control that provides smooth assistance torques. It operates two models simultaneously, one in the case in which the left foot is grounded and another for the grounded right foot. These models generate assistive torques combined to provide continuous and smooth overall assistance, preventing any abrupt changes in torque due to model switching. The EXPERIENCE protocol consists of walking on flat ground while gathering physiological signals such as heart rate, its variability, respiration rate, and galvanic skin response and completing a questionnaire. The test was performed with five healthy subjects. The scope of the present study is twofold: to evaluate the specific exoskeleton and its current control system to gain insight into possible improvements and to present a case study for a formal and replicable benchmarking of wearable robots.
Read more8/19/2024
✨
0
Exoskeleton-Mediated Physical Human-Human Interaction for a Sit-to-Stand Rehabilitation Task
Lorenzo Vianello, Emek Bar{i}c{s} Kuc{c}uktabak, Matthew Short, Cl'ement Lhoste, Lorenzo Amato, Kevin Lynch, Jose Pons
Sit-to-Stand (StS) is a fundamental daily activity that can be challenging for stroke survivors due to strength, motor control, and proprioception deficits in their lower limbs. Existing therapies involve repetitive StS exercises, but these can be physically demanding for therapists while assistive devices may limit patient participation and hinder motor learning. To address these challenges, this work proposes the use of two lower-limb exoskeletons to mediate physical interaction between therapists and patients during a StS rehabilitative task. This approach offers several advantages, including improved therapist-patient interaction, safety enforcement, and performance quantification. The whole body control of the two exoskeletons transmits online feedback between the two users, but at the same time assists in movement and ensures balance, and thus helping subjects with greater difficulty. In this study we present the architecture of the framework, presenting and discussing some technical choices made in the design.
Read more5/22/2024