Heuristic evaluations of back support, shoulder support, hand grip strength support, and sit-stand support exoskeletons using universal design principles
0
📉
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This study aimed to evaluate the universal design of four different types of exoskeletons (back support, shoulder support, handgrip strength support, and sit-stand exoskeleton) during the tasks of assembly, donning, doffing, and disassembly.
- Seven evaluators used universal design principles to independently assess and rate the exoskeletons on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (excellent design).
- The results suggest that the exoskeletons performed poorly in areas such as providing perceptible information to the user, ensuring equitable use, simplicity and intuitiveness, error prevention and recovery.
- Assembling and donning the exoskeletons presented the most challenges.
Plain English Explanation
Exoskeletons are wearable robotic devices that can help workers perform their jobs more easily and reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injuries. However, for these devices to be truly useful, they need to be designed in a way that makes them accessible and easy to use for a wide range of workers, regardless of their physical abilities or characteristics.
In this study, researchers looked at four different types of exoskeletons and evaluated how well they were designed for universal use. They focused on the tasks of assembling, putting on (donning), taking off (doffing), and disassembling the exoskeletons. A team of seven evaluators used established design principles to assess and rate the exoskeletons on a scale of 1 to 5.
The results suggest that the exoskeletons had some significant shortcomings. For example, they did not provide clear information to the user about how to use them, and they were not equally easy for all types of workers to use. The exoskeletons also tended to be complex and not very intuitive, making it difficult for users to figure out how to operate them. Additionally, the designs did not do a good job of preventing user errors or allowing for quick recovery if an error did occur.
Overall, the biggest challenges were encountered during the assembly and donning tasks, which were rated as the most difficult for users. This suggests that more work is needed to make exoskeletons truly accessible and user-friendly for a diverse workforce.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this study used a heuristic evaluation approach to assess the universal design of four different types of exoskeletons: a back support, a shoulder support, a handgrip strength support, and a sit-stand exoskeleton. Heuristic evaluation is a usability inspection method where a set of evaluators independently assess an interactive system against a set of established design principles or "heuristics."
In this case, the evaluators used the seven principles of universal design as the heuristics: 1) equitable use, 2) flexibility in use, 3) simple and intuitive use, 4) perceptible information, 5) tolerance for error, 6) low physical effort, and 7) size and space for approach and use.
Seven evaluators independently rated the exoskeletons on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 5 = excellent design) for how well they supported these universal design principles during the tasks of assembly, donning, doffing, and disassembly.
The results showed that the exoskeletons performed poorly in several key areas, including providing perceptible information to the user, ensuring equitable use for diverse users, maintaining simplicity and intuitiveness, and preventing/recovering from user errors. The assembly and donning tasks presented the most challenges for the evaluators.
These findings suggest that more work is needed to design exoskeletons that are truly accessible and user-friendly for a wide range of workers, not just those with specific physical characteristics or abilities. Ensuring universal usability should be a key priority in the development of these assistive technologies.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into the current limitations of exoskeleton design when it comes to universal usability. By focusing on the specific tasks of assembly, donning, doffing, and disassembly, the researchers were able to identify key areas where the exoskeletons fell short, such as providing clear information to users and preventing errors.
However, the study is limited in scope, as it only evaluated four specific exoskeleton models. It's possible that other exoskeleton designs may perform better on the universal design criteria. Additionally, the study relied on heuristic evaluation by a small group of evaluators, which could introduce some subjective bias.
Further research is needed to validate these findings across a wider range of exoskeleton models and with a more diverse set of users. It would also be valuable to explore specific design interventions that could improve the universal usability of exoskeletons, such as better feedback mechanisms or simplified assembly/donning procedures.
Overall, this study highlights an important challenge in the development of exoskeletons and other assistive technologies. Ensuring that these devices are accessible and usable for all workers, regardless of their individual characteristics, should be a key priority for designers and researchers in this field.
Conclusion
This study provides a critical evaluation of the universal design of four different exoskeleton models, focusing on the key tasks of assembly, donning, doffing, and disassembly. The results suggest that current exoskeleton designs fall short in several areas, including providing clear information to users, ensuring equitable use, maintaining simplicity and intuitiveness, and preventing/recovering from user errors.
These findings highlight the need for a stronger focus on universal usability in the development of exoskeletons and other assistive technologies. By addressing these design challenges, researchers and engineers can help ensure that these devices are accessible and beneficial for a wide range of workers, ultimately improving workplace safety and productivity.
Further research and design iterations will be crucial to advancing the field of exoskeleton technology and making it truly inclusive and user-friendly for all.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
0
Heuristic evaluations of back support, shoulder support, hand grip strength support, and sit-stand support exoskeletons using universal design principles
Alejandra Martinez, Laura Tovar, Carla Irigoyen Amparan, Karen Gonzalez, Prajina Edayath, Priyadarshini Pennathur, Arunkumar Pennathur
Occupational exoskeletons promise to reduce the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries; however, we do not know if their designs allow universal use by all workers. We also do not know how easy the tasks of assembling, donning, doffing, and disassembling exoskeletons are. The purpose of our study was to heuristically evaluate a back support, a shoulder support, a handgrip strength support, and a sit-stand exoskeleton for how well they are designed for universal use when assembling, donning, doffing, and disassembling the exoskeleton. Seven evaluators used universal design principles and associated criteria to independently evaluate and rate four exoskeletons when assembling, donning, doffing, and disassembling the devices. The rating scale was a Likert-type scale, where a rating of 1 represented not at all, and a rating of 5 represented an excellent design with respect to the universal design criteria for the task. The results indicate that providing perceptible information to the user, making the design equitable to use for a diverse set of users, making the design simple and intuitive to use with adequate feedback, and designing to prevent user errors, and when errors are made, allowing the user to recover quickly from the errors, were rated poorly. Assembling and donning tasks presented the most challenges.
Read more6/3/2024
🤔
0
Usability of back support, shoulder support and sit-stand passive occupational exoskeletons: A heuristic evaluation of the designs
Alejandra Martinez, Laura Tovar, Carla Irigoyen Amparan, Karen Gonzalez, Prajina Edayath, Priyadarshini Pennathur, Arunkumar Pennathur
Occupational exoskeletons promise to alleviate musculoskeletal injuries among industrial workers. Knowledge of the usability of the exoskeleton designs with respect to the user device interaction points, and the problems in design features, functions and parts, evaluated and rated using design principles is still limited. Further, the usability of exoskeletons when assembling, donning, doffing and disassembling them, tasks that can be considered pre and post use tasks are also critical to evaluate, especially from a device design standpoint. We conducted a heuristic evaluation of the usability of three popular exoskeletons, a back support device, a shoulder support device, and a sit stand exoskeleton when assembling, donning, doffing and disassembling them. Seven evaluators used Nielsen and Shneiderman usability heuristics to evaluate the devices. Results indicate that none of the three exoskeletons had any catastrophic usability problems, but all three had major usability problems including accommodating diverse users, the assembly, donning and doffing being a two person operation, poor documentation, a lack of sequence indicators during assembly of the devices, presence of safety hazards while donning and doffing the devices, and manual strength requirements. Further, the assembly task is the most difficult task resulting in the most violations of usability heuristics. The exoskeleton human factors research community should include diverse users in their evaluations and conduct usability, accessibility, and safety evaluations of these devices to provide design feedback to device designers.
Read more8/7/2024
0
User-centered evaluation of the Wearable Walker lower limb exoskeleton, preliminary assessment based on the Experience protocol
Cristian Camardella, Vittorio Lippi, Francesco Porcini, Giulia Bassani, Lucia Lencioni, Christoph Mauer, Christian Haverkamp, Carlo Alberto Avizzano, Antonio Frisoli, Alessandro Filippeschi
Using lower-limbs exoskeletons provides potential advantages in terms of productivity and safety associated with reduced stress. However, complex issues in human-robot interaction are still open, such as the physiological effects of exoskeletons and the impact on the user's subjective experience. In this work, an innovative exoskeleton, the Wearable Walker, is assessed using the EXPERIENCE benchmarking protocol from the EUROBENCH project. The Wearable Walker is a lower-limb exoskeleton that enhances human abilities, such as carrying loads. The device uses a unique control approach called Blend Control that provides smooth assistance torques. It operates two models simultaneously, one in the case in which the left foot is grounded and another for the grounded right foot. These models generate assistive torques combined to provide continuous and smooth overall assistance, preventing any abrupt changes in torque due to model switching. The EXPERIENCE protocol consists of walking on flat ground while gathering physiological signals such as heart rate, its variability, respiration rate, and galvanic skin response and completing a questionnaire. The test was performed with five healthy subjects. The scope of the present study is twofold: to evaluate the specific exoskeleton and its current control system to gain insight into possible improvements and to present a case study for a formal and replicable benchmarking of wearable robots.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Enhanced Optimization Strategies to Design an Underactuated Hand Exoskeleton
Baris Akbas, Huseyin Taner Yuksel, Aleyna Soylemez, Mine Sarac, Fabio Stroppa
Exoskeletons can boost human strength and provide assistance to individuals with physical disabilities. However, ensuring safety and optimal performance in their design poses substantial challenges. This study presents the design process for an underactuated hand exoskeleton (U-HEx), first including a single objective (maximizing force transmission), then expanding into multi objective (also minimizing torque variance and actuator displacement). The optimization relies on a Genetic Algorithm, the Big Bang-Big Crunch Algorithm, and their versions for multi-objective optimization. Analyses revealed that using Big Bang-Big Crunch provides high and more consistent results in terms of optimality with lower convergence time. In addition, adding more objectives offers a variety of trade-off solutions to the designers, who might later set priorities for the objectives without repeating the process - at the cost of complicating the optimization algorithm and computational burden. These findings underline the importance of performing proper optimization while designing exoskeletons, as well as providing a significant improvement to this specific robotic design.
Read more8/15/2024