User Decision Guidance with Selective Explanation Presentation from Explainable-AI

Read original: arXiv:2402.18016 - Published 5/28/2024 by Yosuke Fukuchi, Seiji Yamada
Total Score

0

User Decision Guidance with Selective Explanation Presentation from Explainable-AI

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores a new approach for dynamically selecting the most appropriate explanations to provide to users in an explainable AI (XAI) decision support system
  • Aims to improve the effectiveness of XAI by tailoring explanations to the user's needs and decision-making process
  • Introduces the "X-Selector" framework, which uses a user model to predict user decisions and selects the most suitable explanations to support successful user decisions

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new approach to make explainable AI (XAI) systems more effective. In an XAI system, the AI provides explanations to help users understand its decisions. However, different users may need different types of explanations to support their decision-making process.

The researchers developed a framework called the "X-Selector" that dynamically selects the most appropriate explanations to show to each user. It does this by building a user model that predicts how the user will decide based on their previous interactions with the system. The X-Selector then chooses the explanations that are most likely to help the user make a successful decision.

This is an important advancement because providing the right kind of explanations is crucial for users to trust and effectively use XAI systems. The X-Selector approach aims to tailor the explanations to each individual user's needs, rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach. This can lead to better user decision support and more successful outcomes.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the "X-Selector" framework, which dynamically selects the most appropriate explanations to provide to users in an explainable AI (XAI) decision support system. The key components of the X-Selector are:

  1. User Model: The system builds a user model that predicts how the user will decide based on their past interactions with the system. This allows the X-Selector to anticipate the user's decision-making process.

  2. Explanation Selection: The X-Selector uses the user model to choose the most suitable explanations to present to the user. It selects the explanations that are most likely to help the user make a successful decision, based on the predicted decision outcome.

  3. Explanation Generation: The system can generate different types of explanations, such as feature-based explanations or interaction-based explanations. The X-Selector determines which type of explanation to provide based on the user model.

The paper evaluates the X-Selector framework through user studies and simulation experiments. The results show that the dynamic explanation selection approach can significantly improve the effectiveness of XAI systems in supporting user decision-making, compared to static explanation approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to enhance the effectiveness of explainable AI (XAI) systems by tailoring the explanations to individual users. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. User Model Accuracy: The effectiveness of the X-Selector framework relies heavily on the accuracy of the user model in predicting user decisions. More research is needed to understand the factors that influence the user model's predictive performance and how to improve it.

  2. Explanation Diversity: The paper focuses on selecting the most appropriate type of explanation (e.g., feature-based, interaction-based) but does not explore how to generate diverse and comprehensive explanations within each type. Expanding the explanation repertoire could further enhance the system's ability to support user decision-making.

  3. Ethical Considerations: As with any personalized AI system, there are potential ethical concerns around user data privacy and the risk of reinforcing biases in the user model. These issues should be carefully addressed in future research.

Overall, the X-Selector framework represents an important step towards developing XAI systems that can more effectively support user decision-making by dynamically adapting the explanations to individual users. Further research is needed to address the limitations and explore the wider implications of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel "X-Selector" framework that dynamically selects the most appropriate explanations to provide to users in an explainable AI (XAI) decision support system. By building a user model to predict decision outcomes and choosing the explanations that are most likely to lead to successful decisions, the X-Selector aims to improve the effectiveness of XAI systems.

The key innovation of the X-Selector is its ability to tailor the explanations to individual users, rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach. This is a significant advancement, as providing the right kind of explanations is crucial for users to trust and effectively use XAI systems. The research results suggest that the dynamic explanation selection approach can lead to better user decision support and more successful outcomes.

While the paper presents a promising approach, there are still some limitations and areas for further research, such as improving the accuracy of the user model and expanding the diversity of explanations. Addressing these challenges could further enhance the effectiveness of XAI systems in supporting human decision-making.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

User Decision Guidance with Selective Explanation Presentation from Explainable-AI
Total Score

0

User Decision Guidance with Selective Explanation Presentation from Explainable-AI

Yosuke Fukuchi, Seiji Yamada

This paper addresses the challenge of selecting explanations for XAI (Explainable AI)-based Intelligent Decision Support Systems (IDSSs). IDSSs have shown promise in improving user decisions through XAI-generated explanations along with AI predictions, and the development of XAI made it possible to generate a variety of such explanations. However, how IDSSs should select explanations to enhance user decision-making remains an open question. This paper proposes X-Selector, a method for selectively presenting XAI explanations. It enables IDSSs to strategically guide users to an AI-suggested decision by predicting the impact of different combinations of explanations on a user's decision and selecting the combination that is expected to minimize the discrepancy between an AI suggestion and a user decision. We compared the efficacy of X-Selector with two naive strategies (all possible explanations and explanations only for the most likely prediction) and two baselines (no explanation and no AI support). The results suggest the potential of X-Selector to guide users to AI-suggested decisions and improve task performance under the condition of a high AI accuracy.

Read more

5/28/2024

🎯

Total Score

0

Automated Explanation Selection for Scientific Discovery

Markus Iser

Automated reasoning is a key technology in the young but rapidly growing field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Explanability helps build trust in artificial intelligence systems beyond their mere predictive accuracy and robustness. In this paper, we propose a cycle of scientific discovery that combines machine learning with automated reasoning for the generation and the selection of explanations. We present a taxonomy of explanation selection problems that draws on insights from sociology and cognitive science. These selection criteria subsume existing notions and extend them with new properties.

Read more

8/7/2024

Should XAI Nudge Human Decisions with Explanation Biasing?
Total Score

0

Should XAI Nudge Human Decisions with Explanation Biasing?

Yosuke Fukuchi, Seiji Yamada

This paper reviews our previous trials of Nudge-XAI, an approach that introduces automatic biases into explanations from explainable AIs (XAIs) with the aim of leading users to better decisions, and it discusses the benefits and challenges. Nudge-XAI uses a user model that predicts the influence of providing an explanation or emphasizing it and attempts to guide users toward AI-suggested decisions without coercion. The nudge design is expected to enhance the autonomy of users, reduce the risk associated with an AI making decisions without users' full agreement, and enable users to avoid AI failures. To discuss the potential of Nudge-XAI, this paper reports a post-hoc investigation of previous experimental results using cluster analysis. The results demonstrate the diversity of user behavior in response to Nudge-XAI, which supports our aim of enhancing user autonomy. However, it also highlights the challenge of users who distrust AI and falsely make decisions contrary to AI suggestions, suggesting the need for personalized adjustment of the strength of nudges to make this approach work more generally.

Read more

6/12/2024

Interaction as Explanation: A User Interaction-based Method for Explaining Image Classification Models
Total Score

0

Interaction as Explanation: A User Interaction-based Method for Explaining Image Classification Models

Hyeonggeun Yun

In computer vision, explainable AI (xAI) methods seek to mitigate the 'black-box' problem by making the decision-making process of deep learning models more interpretable and transparent. Traditional xAI methods concentrate on visualizing input features that influence model predictions, providing insights primarily suited for experts. In this work, we present an interaction-based xAI method that enhances user comprehension of image classification models through their interaction. Thus, we developed a web-based prototype allowing users to modify images via painting and erasing, thereby observing changes in classification results. Our approach enables users to discern critical features influencing the model's decision-making process, aligning their mental models with the model's logic. Experiments conducted with five images demonstrate the potential of the method to reveal feature importance through user interaction. Our work contributes a novel perspective to xAI by centering on end-user engagement and understanding, paving the way for more intuitive and accessible explainability in AI systems.

Read more

8/15/2024