Using the Empirical Attainment Function for Analyzing Single-objective Black-box Optimization Algorithms
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses the use of the Empirical Attainment Function (EAF) for analyzing the performance of single-objective black-box optimization algorithms.
- The EAF provides a way to compare the performance of different optimization algorithms by estimating the probability of attaining a given objective function value.
- The paper explores the relationship between the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (ECDF) and the EAF, and how the EAF can be used to provide a more comprehensive analysis of algorithm performance.
Plain English Explanation
When researchers want to compare the performance of different optimization algorithms, they often use a metric called the Empirical Attainment Function (EAF). The EAF estimates the probability that an algorithm will be able to achieve a certain objective function value, which is a measure of how well the algorithm is performing.
The EAF is related to another metric called the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (ECDF), which is a way to summarize the distribution of objective function values that an algorithm has achieved. The paper explains how the EAF and the ECDF are connected, and how the EAF can provide more detailed information about algorithm performance than the ECDF alone.
By using the EAF, researchers can get a better understanding of how different optimization algorithms compare to each other, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. This can help inform the choice of algorithms for specific optimization problems, and can also guide the development of new and improved optimization algorithms.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the relationship between the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (ECDF) and the Empirical Attainment Function (EAF) for analyzing the performance of single-objective black-box optimization algorithms.
The ECDF is a way to summarize the distribution of objective function values achieved by an optimization algorithm over multiple runs. The EAF, on the other hand, estimates the probability that an algorithm will attain a given objective function value. The paper shows that the EAF can be derived from the ECDF, and provides a more comprehensive analysis of algorithm performance.
The authors demonstrate the use of the EAF through several examples, including comparing the performance of different optimization algorithms on a set of benchmark functions. They show how the EAF can provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of different algorithms, and how it can be used to guide the development of new and improved optimization methods.
The paper also discusses the potential limitations of the EAF, such as the need for a large number of algorithm runs to obtain reliable estimates, and the challenge of visualizing high-dimensional EAFs. The authors suggest areas for further research, such as the development of new visualization techniques and the extension of the EAF to multi-objective optimization problems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-reasoned exploration of the use of the Empirical Attainment Function (EAF) for analyzing the performance of single-objective black-box optimization algorithms. The authors demonstrate the advantages of the EAF over the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (ECDF) and provide clear examples of its application.
One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on a large number of algorithm runs to obtain reliable EAF estimates. This may be a practical challenge for some optimization problems, particularly those with high computational complexity. The authors acknowledge this limitation and suggest areas for further research, such as the development of more efficient EAF estimation techniques.
Another potential area for further investigation is the extension of the EAF to multi-objective optimization problems. The authors briefly mention this as a future research direction, but a more detailed exploration of how the EAF can be adapted to handle multiple objectives would be valuable.
Overall, the paper provides a compelling case for the use of the EAF in the analysis of optimization algorithm performance. The insights gained from this approach can inform the selection and development of optimization algorithms, ultimately leading to improved performance for a wide range of optimization problems.
Conclusion
The paper presents a detailed analysis of the Empirical Attainment Function (EAF) and its relationship to the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (ECDF) for evaluating the performance of single-objective black-box optimization algorithms. The EAF provides a more comprehensive and informative metric for comparing the capabilities of different optimization algorithms, enabling researchers to gain deeper insights into their strengths and weaknesses.
The technical explanation and examples provided in the paper demonstrate the practical utility of the EAF, while the critical analysis highlights potential limitations and areas for further research. Overall, this work contributes to the ongoing effort to develop more effective and efficient optimization methods, which have significant implications for a wide range of scientific and engineering applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Using the Empirical Attainment Function for Analyzing Single-objective Black-box Optimization Algorithms
Manuel L'opez-Ib'a~nez, Diederick Vermetten, Johann Dreo, Carola Doerr
A widely accepted way to assess the performance of iterative black-box optimizers is to analyze their empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of pre-defined quality targets achieved not later than a given runtime. In this work, we consider an alternative approach, based on the empirical attainment function (EAF) and we show that the target-based ECDF is an approximation of the EAF. We argue that the EAF has several advantages over the target-based ECDF. In particular, it does not require defining a priori quality targets per function, captures performance differences more precisely, and enables the use of additional summary statistics that enrich the analysis. We also show that the average area over the convergence curves is a simpler-to-calculate, but equivalent, measure of anytime performance. To facilitate the accessibility of the EAF, we integrate a module to compute it into the IOHanalyzer platform. Finally, we illustrate the use of the EAF via synthetic examples and via the data available for the BBOB suite.
Read more9/17/2024
0
FunBO: Discovering Acquisition Functions for Bayesian Optimization with FunSearch
Virginia Aglietti, Ira Ktena, Jessica Schrouff, Eleni Sgouritsa, Francisco J. R. Ruiz, Alan Malek, Alexis Bellot, Silvia Chiappa
The sample efficiency of Bayesian optimization algorithms depends on carefully crafted acquisition functions (AFs) guiding the sequential collection of function evaluations. The best-performing AF can vary significantly across optimization problems, often requiring ad-hoc and problem-specific choices. This work tackles the challenge of designing novel AFs that perform well across a variety of experimental settings. Based on FunSearch, a recent work using Large Language Models (LLMs) for discovery in mathematical sciences, we propose FunBO, an LLM-based method that can be used to learn new AFs written in computer code by leveraging access to a limited number of evaluations for a set of objective functions. We provide the analytic expression of all discovered AFs and evaluate them on various global optimization benchmarks and hyperparameter optimization tasks. We show how FunBO identifies AFs that generalize well in and out of the training distribution of functions, thus outperforming established general-purpose AFs and achieving competitive performance against AFs that are customized to specific function types and are learned via transfer-learning algorithms.
Read more7/2/2024
🛠️
0
BOtied: Multi-objective Bayesian optimization with tied multivariate ranks
Ji Won Park, Natav{s}a Tagasovska, Michael Maser, Stephen Ra, Kyunghyun Cho
Many scientific and industrial applications require the joint optimization of multiple, potentially competing objectives. Multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) is a sample-efficient framework for identifying Pareto-optimal solutions. At the heart of MOBO is the acquisition function, which determines the next candidate to evaluate by navigating the best compromises among the objectives. In this paper, we show a natural connection between non-dominated solutions and the extreme quantile of the joint cumulative distribution function (CDF). Motivated by this link, we propose the Pareto-compliant CDF indicator and the associated acquisition function, BOtied. BOtied inherits desirable invariance properties of the CDF, and an efficient implementation with copulas allows it to scale to many objectives. Our experiments on a variety of synthetic and real-world problems demonstrate that BOtied outperforms state-of-the-art MOBO acquisition functions while being computationally efficient for many objectives.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Diff-BBO: Diffusion-Based Inverse Modeling for Black-Box Optimization
Dongxia Wu, Nikki Lijing Kuang, Ruijia Niu, Yi-An Ma, Rose Yu
Black-box optimization (BBO) aims to optimize an objective function by iteratively querying a black-box oracle. This process demands sample-efficient optimization due to the high computational cost of function evaluations. While prior studies focus on forward approaches to learn surrogates for the unknown objective function, they struggle with high-dimensional inputs where valid inputs form a small subspace (e.g., valid protein sequences), which is common in real-world tasks. Recently, diffusion models have demonstrated impressive capability in learning the high-dimensional data manifold. They have shown promising performance in black-box optimization tasks but only in offline settings. In this work, we propose diffusion-based inverse modeling for black-box optimization (Diff-BBO), the first inverse approach leveraging diffusion models for online BBO problem. Diff-BBO distinguishes itself from forward approaches through the design of acquisition function. Instead of proposing candidates in the design space, Diff-BBO employs a novel acquisition function Uncertainty-aware Exploration (UaE) to propose objective function values, which leverages the uncertainty of a conditional diffusion model to generate samples in the design space. Theoretically, we prove that using UaE leads to optimal optimization outcomes. Empirically, we redesign experiments on the Design-Bench benchmark for online settings and show that Diff-BBO achieves state-of-the-art performance.
Read more7/2/2024