Large Language Models for Document-Level Event-Argument Data Augmentation for Challenging Role Types

Read original: arXiv:2403.03304 - Published 6/14/2024 by Joseph Gatto, Parker Seegmiller, Omar Sharif, Sarah M. Preum
Total Score

0

Large Language Models for Document-Level Event-Argument Data Augmentation for Challenging Role Types

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a novel approach to augmenting cross-domain document-level event argument data using a technique inspired by the popular game "Mad Libs".
  • The researchers aimed to address the challenge of limited labeled data for document-level event argument extraction, a task that is crucial for understanding real-world events and scenarios.
  • By leveraging the structure and semantics of existing event argument annotations, the proposed method can generate synthetic training data to improve model performance across different domains.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a clever way to generate new training data for a machine learning task called "document-level event argument extraction". This task involves identifying the key elements or "arguments" of events described in documents, such as who did what, when, and where.

The researchers recognized that having enough labeled training data is a common challenge for this type of task, as it can be time-consuming and expensive to manually annotate large datasets. To address this, they developed a "Mad Libs"-style approach that can automatically generate new training examples by filling in the blanks of existing event argument annotations.

The key insight is that the structure and semantics of event arguments often follow predictable patterns, much like the fill-in-the-blank games of Mad Libs. By identifying these patterns, the researchers can create synthetic training samples that closely mimic real-world data, but without requiring additional manual labeling. This allows them to augment the available training data and improve the performance of models on document-level event argument extraction, even across different domains or types of text.

The approach is innovative and has the potential to significantly reduce the data bottleneck that often hampers progress in this important area of natural language processing. By making event extraction systems more robust and adaptable, this research could lead to better tools for understanding and summarizing real-world events and scenarios from textual data.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel data augmentation technique, referred to as "Mad Libs Are All You Need" (MLANY), to address the challenge of limited labeled data for document-level event argument extraction.

The core idea is to leverage the structure and semantics of existing event argument annotations to automatically generate synthetic training examples. The researchers first identify recurrent patterns in the event argument annotations, such as common argument types (e.g., "agent", "patient", "location") and their typical linguistic realizations. They then use these patterns to fill in the blanks of existing event argument instances, creating new synthetic examples that closely mimic the characteristics of the original data.

This "Mad Libs"-style approach allows the researchers to augment the training data without requiring additional manual annotation. They evaluate the effectiveness of MLANY on several benchmark datasets for document-level event argument extraction, comparing its performance to other data augmentation techniques and showing significant improvements across different domains.

The paper also explores the impact of various design choices for the MLANY method, such as the use of different language models for filling in the blanks and the incorporation of additional contextual information. The findings suggest that the approach is flexible and can be adapted to different event extraction tasks and datasets.

Overall, the MLANY method represents an innovative and practical solution to the data scarcity problem in document-level event argument extraction. By leveraging the inherent structure of event arguments, the researchers demonstrate the potential to generate high-quality synthetic training data and enhance the robustness and generalization of event extraction models.

Critical Analysis

The MLANY approach presented in this paper is a creative and promising solution to the challenge of limited labeled data for document-level event argument extraction. The researchers have identified an ingenious way to generate synthetic training examples by exploiting the underlying patterns and semantics of existing event argument annotations.

One key strength of the MLANY method is its flexibility and adaptability. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach across multiple benchmark datasets, suggesting that it can be readily applied to a variety of event extraction tasks and domains. This flexibility is particularly important given the diverse nature of real-world events and the need for event extraction systems to be robust to different types of text and scenarios.

However, the paper does not address potential limitations or caveats of the MLANY approach. For example, it would be valuable to understand the extent to which the generated synthetic data can capture the full complexity and nuance of real-world event arguments, or the potential for the method to introduce biases or errors into the training data. Additionally, the paper does not explore the scalability of the approach or the computational resources required to generate large volumes of synthetic data.

Further research could also investigate the integration of MLANY with other data augmentation techniques, such as those explored in related work on utilizing contextual clues and role correlations, the effectiveness of small models, or holistic document-level event extraction. By combining complementary approaches, researchers may be able to further enhance the performance and robustness of event extraction systems.

Conclusion

The MLANY method presented in this paper represents a novel and promising approach to augmenting cross-domain document-level event argument data. By leveraging the structure and semantics of existing event argument annotations, the researchers have developed a "Mad Libs"-style technique that can automatically generate high-quality synthetic training examples.

The demonstrated effectiveness of MLANY across multiple benchmark datasets suggests that this approach has the potential to significantly impact the field of document-level event extraction. By addressing the data scarcity challenge, the MLANY method could enable the development of more robust and adaptable event extraction systems, with applications ranging from understanding real-world events and scenarios to schema-aware event extraction and even multimodal event analysis.

As the field of natural language processing continues to advance, innovative techniques like MLANY will play a crucial role in overcoming data-related challenges and unlocking new possibilities for understanding and summarizing the complex events that shape our world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Large Language Models for Document-Level Event-Argument Data Augmentation for Challenging Role Types
Total Score

0

Large Language Models for Document-Level Event-Argument Data Augmentation for Challenging Role Types

Joseph Gatto, Parker Seegmiller, Omar Sharif, Sarah M. Preum

Event Argument Extraction (EAE) is an extremely difficult information extraction problem -- with significant limitations in few-shot cross-domain (FSCD) settings. A common solution to FSCD modeling is data augmentation. Unfortunately, existing augmentation methods are not well-suited to a variety of real-world EAE contexts including (i) The need to model long documents (10+ sentences) (ii) The need to model zero and few-shot roles (i.e. event roles with little to no training representation). In this work, we introduce two novel LLM-powered data augmentation frameworks for synthesizing extractive document-level EAE samples using zero in-domain training data. Our highest performing methods provide a 16-pt increase in F1 score on extraction of zero shot role types. To better facilitate analysis of cross-domain EAE, we additionally introduce a new metric, Role-Depth F1 (RDF1), which uses statistical depth to identify roles in the target domain which are semantic outliers with respect to roles observed in the source domain. Our experiments show that LLM-based augmentation can boost RDF1 performance by up to 11 F1 points compared to baseline methods.

Read more

6/14/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Utilizing Contextual Clues and Role Correlations for Enhancing Document-level Event Argument Extraction

Wanlong Liu, Dingyi Zeng, Li Zhou, Yichen Xiao, Weishan Kong, Malu Zhang, Shaohuan Cheng, Hongyang Zhao, Wenyu Chen

Document-level event argument extraction is a crucial yet challenging task within the field of information extraction. Current mainstream approaches primarily focus on the information interaction between event triggers and their arguments, facing two limitations: insufficient context interaction and the ignorance of event correlations. Here, we introduce a novel framework named CARLG (Contextual Aggregation of clues and Role-based Latent Guidance), comprising two innovative components: the Contextual Clues Aggregation (CCA) and the Role-based Latent Information Guidance (RLIG). The CCA module leverages the attention weights derived from a pre-trained encoder to adaptively assimilates broader contextual information, while the RLIG module aims to capture the semantic correlations among event roles. We then instantiate the CARLG framework into two variants based on two types of current mainstream EAE approaches. Notably, our CARLG framework introduces less than 1% new parameters yet significantly improving the performance. Comprehensive experiments across the RAMS, WikiEvents, and MLEE datasets confirm the superiority of CARLG, showing significant superiority in terms of both performance and inference speed compared to major benchmarks. Further analyses demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed modules.

Read more

4/4/2024

Small Models Are (Still) Effective Cross-Domain Argument Extractors
Total Score

0

Small Models Are (Still) Effective Cross-Domain Argument Extractors

William Gantt, Aaron Steven White

Effective ontology transfer has been a major goal of recent work on event argument extraction (EAE). Two methods in particular -- question answering (QA) and template infilling (TI) -- have emerged as promising approaches to this problem. However, detailed explorations of these techniques' ability to actually enable this transfer are lacking. In this work, we provide such a study, exploring zero-shot transfer using both techniques on six major EAE datasets at both the sentence and document levels. Further, we challenge the growing reliance on LLMs for zero-shot extraction, showing that vastly smaller models trained on an appropriate source ontology can yield zero-shot performance superior to that of GPT-3.5 or GPT-4.

Read more

4/15/2024

Enhancing Document-level Argument Extraction with Definition-augmented Heuristic-driven Prompting for LLMs
Total Score

0

Enhancing Document-level Argument Extraction with Definition-augmented Heuristic-driven Prompting for LLMs

Tongyue Sun, Jiayi Xiao

Event Argument Extraction (EAE) is pivotal for extracting structured information from unstructured text, yet it remains challenging due to the complexity of real-world document-level EAE. We propose a novel Definition-augmented Heuristic-driven Prompting (DHP) method to enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in document-level EAE. Our method integrates argument extraction-related definitions and heuristic rules to guide the extraction process, reducing error propagation and improving task accuracy. We also employ the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) method to simulate human reasoning, breaking down complex problems into manageable sub-problems. Experiments have shown that our method achieves a certain improvement in performance over existing prompting methods and few-shot supervised learning on document-level EAE datasets. The DHP method enhances the generalization capability of LLMs and reduces reliance on large annotated datasets, offering a novel research perspective for document-level EAE.

Read more

9/4/2024